Medical and Nonmedical Factors Influencing Utilization of Delayed Pushing in the Second Stage

Abstract

Objective To evaluate factors impacting selection to delayed pushing in the second stage of labor.

Study Design This case-control study was a secondary analysis of a large retrospective cohort study. Cases included women who delayed pushing for 60 minutes or more in the second stage of labor. Controls began pushing prior to 60 minutes from the time of diagnosis of complete dilation. Demographic, labor, and nonmedical factors were compared among cases and controls. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors independently associated with delayed pushing.

Results We identified 471 women who delayed pushing and 4819 controls. Nulliparity, maternal body mass index > 25, high fetal station at complete dilation, regional anesthesia use, and start of second stage during staffing shift change were independent factors associated with increased use of delayed pushing. On the other hand, black race and second-stage management during night shift were associated with lower odds of employing delayed pushing. Delayed pushing was more commonly employed in nulliparous women, but 38.9% of multiparous women also delayed pushing.

Conclusion We identified multiple factors associated with use of delayed pushing. This study helps to define current patterns of second-stage labor management.

Keywords

delayed pushing - labor management - second stage

• References

• 1 Le Ray C, Audibert F, Goffinet F, Fraser W. When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 361 , e1–e7
• 2 Fitzpatrick M, Harkin R, McQuillan K, O'Brien C, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence. BJOG 2002; 109: 1359-1365
• 3 Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Krauss I, Douglas J, Goulet C, Boulvain M. The PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group.. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1165-1172
• 4 Gillesby E, Burns S, Dempsey A , et al. Comparison of delayed versus immediate pushing during second stage of labor for nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010; 39: 635-644
• 5 Hansen SL, Clark SL, Foster JC. Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 29-34
• 6 Kelly M, Johnson E, Lee V , et al. Delayed versus immediate pushing in second stage of labor. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2010; 35: 81-88
• 7 Vause S, Congdon HM, Thornton JG. Immediate and delayed pushing in the second stage of labour for nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 186-188
• 8 Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Cortez S , et al. Does delayed pushing in the second stage of labor impact perinatal outcomes?. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 807-814
• 9 Tuuli MG, Frey HA, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Immediate compared with delayed pushing in the second stage of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 660-668
• 10 Allen VM, Baskett TF, O'Connell CM, McKeen D, Allen AC. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 1248-1258
• 11 Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 933-938
• 12 Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Laros Jr RK, Caughey AB. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 585 , e1–e6
• 13 Goodfellow CF, Hull MG. Epidural analgesia and assisted delivery. Commentary. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 92
• 14 Maresh M, Choong KH, Beard RW. Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural analgesia in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 623-627
• 15 Mayberry LJ, Hammer R, Kelly C, True-Driver B, De A. Use of delayed pushing with epidural anesthesia: findings from a randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 26-30
• 16 Plunkett BA, Lin A, Wong CA, Grobman WA, Peaceman AM. Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 109-114
• 17 Simpson KR, James DC. Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second-stage labor on fetal well-being: a randomized clinical trial. Nurs Res 2005; 54: 149-157
• 18 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2 Pt 1) 451-461
• 19 Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (Suppl. 01) S5-S20
• 20 National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: S1-S22
• 21 Buxton EJ, Redman CWE, Obhrai M. Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural in labour-does it increase the incidence of spontaneous delivery?. J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 8: 258-261
• 22 Fraser WD, Cayer M, Soeder BM, Turcot L, Marcoux S. PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group. Risk factors for difficult delivery in nulliparas with epidural analgesia in second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 409-418