RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329711
Thoracoscopy versus Thoracotomy for Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair: Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis
Publikationsverlauf
29. August 2012
30. August 2012
Publikationsdatum:
21. November 2012 (online)
Abstract
Introduction The thoracoscopic approach to esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TOF) represents a challenging procedure whose real benefits remains unclear. Our purpose is to identify, through a meta-analysis, clinical evidence of the reliability of the thoracoscopic repair (TR) for EA/TOF compared with the open repair.
Materials and Methods Defined PubMed search, with analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications after open or thoracoscopic primary anastomosis for EA/TOF.
Results Five articles met the criteria of meta-analysis, being comparative studies between TR and conventional open repair (COR), although they were retrospective. One article was excluded because it was available only in Japanese. We observed a slight prevalence, statistically insignificant, of the intraoperative and postoperative complication rate for TR: odds ratio (OR) 1.29. Excluding the conversion rate, the meta-analysis between the complication rate for TR and COR did not show a significant difference (OR 0.64). Anastomosis's leaks and strictures considered together did not show a significant difference between the two techniques, p = not significant and OR of 0.56. Similar results were observed analyzing the single outcome of leaks and strictures; the meta-analysis did not show any significant differences with an OR, respectively, of 1.05 and 0.43.
Conclusions The effectiveness of the endoscopic technique for EA/TOF repair is indicated with outcomes not different from open surgery. A randomized controlled trial is needed in this field to indicate which procedure is superior, open or TR.
-
References
- 1 Spitz L. Esophageal atresia. Lessons I have learned in a 40-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41 (10) 1635-1640
- 2 Haight C. Congenital atresia of esophagus with tracheoesophageal fistula: reconstruction of esophageal continuity by primary anastomosis. Ann Surg 1944; 120 (4) 623-652
- 3 Rodgers BM, Talbert JL. Thoracoscopy for diagnosis of intrathoracic lesions in children. J Pediatr Surg 1976; 11 (5) 703-708
- 4 Lobe TE, Rothenberg SS, Waldschmitt J. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia in an infant: a surgical first. Ped Endosurg Innovative Tech 1999; 3: 141-148
- 5 Rothenberg SS. Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in a newborn infant. Ped Endosurg Innovative Tech 2000; 4: 289-294
- 6 Rothenberg SS. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula. Semin Pediatr Surg 2005; 14 (1) 2-7
- 7 Holcomb III GW, Rothenberg SS, Bax KM , et al. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg 2005; 242 (3) 422-428 , discussion 428–430
- 8 Engum SA. Minimal access thoracic surgery in the pediatric population. Semin Pediatr Surg 2007; 16 (1) 14-26
- 9 Bax KM, van Der Zee DC. Feasibility of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with distal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (2) 192-196
- 10 MacKinlay GA. Esophageal atresia surgery in the 21st century. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (1) 20-22
- 11 Lugo B, Malhotra A, Guner Y, Nguyen T, Ford H, Nguyen NX. Thoracoscopic versus open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008; 18 (5) 753-756
- 12 Al Tokhais T, Zamakhshary M, Aldekhayel S , et al. Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistulas: a case-control matched study. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (5) 805-809
- 13 Allal H, Pérez-Bertólez S, Maillet O , et al. Estudio comparativo de toracoscopia versus toracotomía en atresia esofágica. Cir Pediatr 2009; 22 (4) 177-180
- 14 Szavay PO, Zundel S, Blumenstock G , et al. Perioperative outcome of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula undergoing open versus thoracoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21 (5) 439-443