Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2012; 16(05): 360-366
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329879
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Technique and Application of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Management of Inflammatory Arthritis

Emma L. Rowbotham
1   Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, United Kingdom
,
Richard J. Wakefield
2   Department of Rheumatology, LIMM, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
,
Andrew J. Grainger
3   Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
4   Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 December 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Ultrasound is increasingly used by radiologists and rheumatologists for the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory arthritis in day-to-day clinical practice. It is ideally suited to demonstrating early changes of these conditions before they are evident using conventional radiography or indeed clinical examination. Ultrasound readily demonstrates synovitis, effusion, soft tissue changes, and some bone features (including erosion and enthesophyte formation) of inflammatory arthritis. It also provides a way to quantify disease activity. This article reviews the ultrasound imaging features of the inflammatory arthritides and techniques involved. It also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of ultrasound as opposed to magnetic resonance imaging.

Keywords

ultrasound - synovitis - erosion - rheumatoid arthritis
 

  • References

  • 1 Hartgerink P, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, van Holsbeeck MT. Full- versus partial-thickness Achilles tendon tears: sonographic accuracy and characterization in 26 cases with surgical correlation. Radiology 2001; 220 (2) 406-412
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Strunk J, Heinemann E, Neeck G, Schmidt KL, Lange U. A new approach to studying angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis by means of power Doppler ultrasonography and measurement of serum vascular endothelial growth factor. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43 (12) 1480-1483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Klauser A, Demharter J, De Marchi A , et al; IACUS study group. Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IACUS study group. Eur Radiol 2005; 15 (12) 2404-2410
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Platzgummer H, Schueller G, Grisar J, Weber M, Schueller-Weidekamm C. Quantification of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: do we really need quantitative measurement of contrast-enhanced ultrasound?. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71 (2) 237-241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50 (7) 2103-2112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Zayat AS, Freeston JE, Conaghan PG, Hensor EM, Emery P, Wakefield RJ. Does joint position affect US findings in inflammatory arthritis?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51 (5) 921-925
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M , et al; OMERACT 7 Special Interest Group. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 2005; 32 (12) 2485-2487
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG , et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43 (12) 2762-2770
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Finzel S, Ohrndorf S, Englbrecht M , et al. A detailed comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound and micro-computed tomography for detection of arthritic bone erosions. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63 (5) 1231-1236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Døhn UM, Terslev L, Szkudlarek M , et al. Detection, scoring and volume assessment of bone erosions by ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with CT. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; ; May 15 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Fiocco U, Cozzi L, Rubaltelli L , et al. Long-term sonographic follow-up of rheumatoid and psoriatic proliferative knee joint synovitis. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35 (2) 155-163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Wakefield RJ, Emery P, Veale D. Ultrasonography and psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2000; 27 (6) 1564-1565
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Perrotta FM, Modesti M, Scarno A, Valesini G. Clinical and ultrasonography assessment of peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50 (11) 2080-2086
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Nalbant S, Corominas H, Hsu B, Chen LX, Schumacher HR, Kitumnuaypong T. Ultrasonography for assessment of subcutaneous nodules. J Rheumatol 2003; 30 (6) 1191-1195
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Möller B, Bonel H, Rotzetter M, Villiger PM, Ziswiler HR. Measuring finger joint cartilage by ultrasound as a promising alternative to conventional radiograph imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61 (4) 435-441
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M, Hakulinen U, Heikkinen JO, Hermunen H. Power Doppler ultrasonography and synovitis: correlating ultrasound imaging with histopathological findings and evaluating the performance of ultrasound equipments. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65 (12) 1590-1595
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Klauser AS, Franz M, Bellmann Weiler R , et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of joint vascularity in arthritis—subjective grading versus computer-aided objective quantification. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32 (Suppl. 02) E31-E37
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Weidekamm C, Köller M, Weber M, Kainberger F. Diagnostic value of high-resolution B-mode and Doppler sonography for imaging of hand and finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48 (2) 325-333
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Kahler E , et al. A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52 (3) 733-743
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Teh J, Stevens K, Williamson L, Leung J, McNally EG. Power Doppler ultrasound of rheumatoid synovitis: quantification of therapeutic response. Br J Radiol 2003; 76 (912) 875-879
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Taylor PC, Steuer A, Gruber J , et al. Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50 (4) 1107-1116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Saleem B, Brown AK, Quinn M , et al. Can flare be predicted in DMARD treated RA patients in remission, and is it important? A cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71 (8) 1316-1321
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR. Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons?. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010; 14 (3) 323-333
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lalitha P, Reddy MCh, Reddy KJ. Musculoskeletal applications of elastography: a pictorial essay of our initial experience. Korean J Radiol 2011; 12 (3) 365-375
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Grassi W, Davies A, Boumendil O. Recent trends and technology advances in rheumatoid arthritis clinical ultrasonography and power Doppler imaging. Eur Musculoskel Rev 2011; 6 (3) 148-152
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar