Perioperative Evaluation and Outcomes of Major Limb Replantations with Ischemia Periods of More Than 6 Hours

Abstract

Early revascularization is cardinal for successful replantation of proximal limb amputations. Prolonged ischemia time potentially leads to reperfusion syndrome and morbidity. The dilemma persists regarding safe duration of cold ischemia time for replantation. The study was conducted to evaluate retrospectively the outcomes of major replantation in terms of limb survival, reperfusion events, morbidity, and potential mortality with respect to the ischemia time and level of amputations. Fourteen patients with proximal amputations at the arm, elbow, and forearm with total ischemia time beyond 6 hours were replanted. All had warm ischemia time of less than 2 hours and were closely monitored to record and correct reperfusion events. Nine out of 14 limbs survived. Five patients had reperfusion events. Proximal limb amputations with larger muscle mass were at higher risk of developing reperfusion syndrome and such events had higher chances of limb loss. Major limb amputations within 2 hours of warm ischemia time even with prolonged cold ischemia can be successfully replanted with closed perioperative monitoring.

Keywords

major replantation - reperfusion syndrome - prolonged ischemia

• References

• 1 Beyersdorf F. Protection of the ischemic skeletal muscle. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 39: 19-28
• 2 Eltzschig HK, Collard CD. Vascular ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Br Med Bull 2004; 70: 71-86
• 3 Blaisdell FW. The pathophysiology of skeletal muscle ischemia and the reperfusion syndrome: a review. Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 10: 620-630
• 4 Buncke GM. Replantation and revascularization. Part 1, volume VII. In: Mathes SJ, ed. Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: 565-585
• 5 Merican AM, Kwan MK, Cheok CY, Wong EL, Sara TA. Successful revascularisation of near total amputation of the upper limb after ten hours of warm ischaemia. Med J Malaysia 2005; 60: 218-221
• 6 Burkhardt GE, Gifford SM, Propper B , et al. The impact of ischemic intervals on neuromuscular recovery in a porcine (Sus scrofa) survival model of extremity vascular injury. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 165-173
• 7 Carden DL, Korthuis RJ. Mechanisms of postischemic vascular dysfunction in skeletal muscle: implications for therapeutic intervention. Microcirc Endothelium Lymphatics 1989; 5: 277-298
• 8 Waikakul S, Vanadurongwan V, Unnanuntana A. Prognostic factors for major limb re-implantation at both immediate and long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 1024-1030
• 9 Murray MJ, Shine TSJ. Surgery of thoracic and abdominal aorta. In: Kaplan JA, ed. Vascular Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2004: 212-213
• 10 McCutcheon C, Hennessy B. Systemic reperfusion injury during arm replantation requiring intraoperative amputation. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 71-73
• 11 Smith GW, McArthur CJ, Simpson IJ. Circulating immune complexes in myocardial infarction. J Clin Lab Immunol 1983; 12: 197-199
• 12 Khalil AA, Aziz FA, Hall JC. Reperfusion injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 1024-1033
• 13 Lazarus B, Messina A, Barker JE , et al. The role of mast cells in ischaemia-reperfusion injury in murine skeletal muscle. J Pathol 2000; 191: 443-448
• 14 Wilhelm MP, Schlensak C, Hoh A , et al. Controlled reperfusion using a simplified perfusion system preserves function after acute and persistent limb ischemia: a preliminary study. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 690-694
• 15 D'Addato M, Pedrini L, Bertoni M , et al. Traumatic amputation of the upper limb: replantation of the arm. J Trauma 1989; 29: 876-879
• 16 Beyersdorf F, Mitrev Z, Ihnken K , et al. Controlled limb reperfusion in patients having cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 873-881