Der PC als Hörtherapeut? DAVID, CASPER, CATS, CAST, SPATS, LACE und andere

Zusammenfassung

Das ausgehende 20. Jahrhundert brachte erhebliche Fortschritte in der Hörtherapie. Interaktive Trainingsprogramme erfüllen prinzipiell eine Reihe von Anforderungen, die an ein Hörtraining gestellt werden. PC-gestützte Übungsprogramme bieten eine gute Unterstützung für eine ganzheitliche Hörtherapie. Hier wird pars pro toto das Programm LACE näher dargestellt.

Abstract

Great improvements in auditory training were made towards the end of the 20^th century. Current interactive training methods meet most of the demands for auditory training. Therewith, PC-based training programmes certainly represent a useful method to assist holistic listening therapy. The LACE programme is presented in detail in this article.

Schlüsselwörter

Hörtraining - Kommunikationstraining - audiologische Rehabilitation

Key words

listening enhancement - communication ­enhancement - audiological rehabilitation

• Literatur

• 1 Ptok M, Meyer S, Ptok A. Hörtraining, Hörtherapie und nicht-apparative Hörrehabilitation bei Schwerhörigen im Wandel der Zeiten. HNO 2012; [Im Druck]
• 2 Cronin B, Sims D, VonFeldt J et al. The DAVID system: the development of an interactive video system at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf. A pilot experiment in computer assisted speechreading instruction utilizing the data analysis video interactive device (DAVID). Am Ann Deaf 1979; 124: 616-623
• 3 Boothroyd A. CASPER: computer-assisted speech perception evaluation and training. In: Steele RD, Gerry WA. Ed. Proceeding of the 10^th Annual Conference of the Rehabilitation Society of North America. Washington DC: Association for Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology; 1987: 734-736
• 4 Dempsey JJ, Levitt H, Josephson J et al. Computer-assisted tracking simulation (CATS). J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 701-710
• 5 Sweetow RW, Henderson Sabes J. The case of LACE: individualized listening and auditory communication enhancement training. Hear J 2004; 57: 32-40
• 6 Miller JD, Watson CS, Kewley-Port D et al. SPATS: speech perception assessment and training system. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122: 3063
• 7 Sweetow RW, Henderson Sabes J. Listening and communication enhancement. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 133-141
• 8 Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. The need for and development of an adaptive listening and communication enhancement (LACE) Program. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 538-558
• 9 Martin M. Software-based auditory training program found to reduce hearing aid return rate. The Hearing Journal 2007; 60: 32-35
• 10 Henderson Sabes J, Sweetow RW. Variables predicting outcomes on listening and communication enhancement (LACE) training. Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 374-383
• 11 Kricos PB, McCarthy P. From ear to there: a historical perspective on auditory training. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 89-98
• 12 Gordon-Salant S. Speech perception and auditory temporal processing performance by older listeners: implications for real-world communication. Semin Hear 2006; 27: 264-268
• 13 Bloom S. Technologic advances raise prospects for a resurgence in use of auditory training. The Hearing Journal 2004; 57: 19-24
• 14 Boothroyd A. Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21: 601-611
• 15 Amitay S, Irwin A, Moore DR. Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 1446-1448
• 16 Amitay S, Hawkey DJC, Moore DR. Rapid early learning is dominated by a perceptual component. New York: the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society; 2005
• 17 Moore DR, Amitay S. Auditory training: rules and applications. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 99-109