Primary versus Secondary Headache in Children: A Frequent Diagnostic Challenge in Clinical Routine

Abstract

A sensitive and specific triage of patients with primary or secondary headache is a major concern in evaluating pediatric headache patients. History and physical examination are the major tools for differentiating primary headache disorders from symptomatic headaches caused by defined pathologies. If the criteria of the International Headache Society for a primary headache disorder are met, no further investigations are necessary. However, physicians should be familiar with subtle signs in history and physical examination that raise suspicion of intracranial pathology. These features, also named “red flags” and “relatively red flags,” are outlined in detail in this review. Any red flag should prompt neuroimaging. In case of relatively red flags, a more restrained approach can be appropriate depending on the individual setting. Excessive concerns of patients and parents regarding an underlying pathology can constitute an indication for neuroimaging. Offering neuroimaging implicates the important issues of incidental findings and of “false reassurance.” These risks should be discussed with patients and parents before the investigation. In any pediatric headache patient, regular clinical reevaluations should be warranted, even if neuroimaging is normal. The value of clinical follow-up examinations for a reasonable and reliable assessment of the patients cannot be overestimated.

Keywords

pediatrics - children - adolescents - primary headache disorder - secondary headache - symptomatic headache - diagnostics - red flags - neuroimaging

^* Timo Roser and Michaela Bonfert share the first authorship.

• References

• 1 Abu-Arafeh I, Razak S, Sivaraman B, Graham C. Prevalence of headache and migraine in children and adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010; 52 (12) 1088-1097
• 2 Conicella E, Raucci U, Vanacore N , et al. The child with headache in a pediatric emergency department. Headache 2008; 48 (7) 1005-1011
• 3 Abu-Arafeh I, Macleod S. Serious neurological disorders in children with chronic headache. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90 (9) 937-940
• 4 The International Classification of Headache Disorders. 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004; (24) (Suppl. 01) 9-160
• 5 Blume HK, Szperka CL. Secondary causes of headaches in children: when it isn't a migraine. Pediatr Ann 2010; 39 (7) 431-439
• 6 Celle ME, Carelli V, Fornarino S. Secondary headache in children. Neurol Sci 2010; 31 (Suppl. 01) S81-S82
• 7 Hershey AD, Powers SW, Winner P, Kabbouche MA. Pediatric Headaches in Clinical Practice. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009
• 8 Seshia SS, Abu-Arafeh I, Hershey AD. Tension-type headache in children: the Cinderella of headache disorders!. Can J Neurol Sci 2009; 36 (6) 687-695
• 9 Parisi P, Papetti L, Spalice A, Nicita F, Ursitti F, Villa MP. Tension-type headache in paediatric age. Acta Paediatr 2011; 100 (4) 491-495
• 10 Wilne S, Koller K, Collier J, Kennedy C, Grundy R, Walker D. The diagnosis of brain tumours in children: a guideline to assist healthcare professionals in the assessment of children who may have a brain tumour. Arch Dis Child 2010; 95 (7) 534-539
• 11 Rho YI, Chung HJ, Suh ES , et al. The role of neuroimaging in children and adolescents with recurrent headaches—multicenter study. Headache 2011; 51 (3) 403-408
• 12 Lewis DW, Ashwal S, Dahl G , et al; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Practice parameter: evaluation of children and adolescents with recurrent headaches: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2002; 59 (4) 490-498
• 13 The Childhood Brain Tumor Consortium. The epidemiology of headache among children with brain tumor. Headache in children with brain tumors. J Neurooncol 1991; 10 (1) 31-46
• 14 May A, Diener HC. [Headache patients in routine clinical practice. When are additional instrumental examinations indicated?]. Schmerz 2007; 21 (1) 43-48
• 15 Streibert PF, Piroth W, Mansour M, Haage P, Langer T, Borusiak P. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in children with headache: the clinical relevance with modern acquisition techniques. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2011; 50 (12) 1134-1139
• 16 Sandrini G, Friberg L, Coppola G , et al. Neurophysiological tests and neuroimaging procedures in non-acute headache, 2nd ed. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18: 373-381
• 17 Schwedt TJ, Guo Y, Rothner AD. “Benign” imaging abnormalities in children and adolescents with headache. Headache 2006; 46 (3) 387-398
• 18 Muehlmann M, Steffinger D, Peraud A , et al. [Non-invasive estimation of intracranial pressure : MR-based evaluation in children with hydrocephalus]. Radiologe 2012; 52 (9) 827-832
• 19 Alperin N, Ranganathan S, Bagci AM , et al. MRI evidence of impaired CSF homeostasis in obesity-associated idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34 (1) 29-34
• 20 Tain RW, Bagci AM, Lam BL, Sklar EM, Ertl-Wagner B, Alperin N. Determination of cranio-spinal canal compliance distribution by MRI: methodology and early application in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34 (6) 1397-1404
• 21 Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R , et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (22) 2078-2086
• 22 Howard L, Wessely S, Leese M , et al. Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76 (11) 1558-1564