Working with Industry: What Is the Conflict?

Abstract

The relationship between medicine and industry has always shared conflicts. There are obvious benefits to these relationships and inherent potential risks. The collaboration between academic medicine and industry has allowed for great advances in medicine in terms of drug, technology, and procedural developments. However, for-profit companies' interests may not align with those of academic universities. Companies tend to undertake research when the results of such work leads to company profits or enhances their reputation, and not solely for greater scientific understanding. In this article, the author reviews the types of conflicts of interest, the role of industry-sponsored trials, the adoption of new technologies from industry, and the role of industry with our medical society.

Keywords

conflict of interest - conflict of commitment - conflict of conscience - industry-sponsored trials - industrial relationships

• References

• 1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011. Rules and Regulations. Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research for Which Public Health Service Funding Is Sought and Responsible Prospective Contractors; Final Rule. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-25/pdf/2011-21633.pdf . Accessed August 31, 2012
• 2 Conflicts of interest. Available at: August 31, 2012 http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/RCRintro/c05/2c5.html . Accessed August 31, 2012
• 3 Duke University Office of Research Support. Conflict of commitment. Available at: http://ors.duke.edu/orsmanual/conflict-commitment . Accessed August 31, 2012
• 4 U.S. Institute of Medicine Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Institutional conflicts of interest. In: Lo B, Field MJ, , eds. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009: 216-229 . Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22934. Accessed August 31, 2012
• 5 Lo B. Serving two masters—conflicts of interest in academic medicine. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (8) 669-671
• 6 Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (20) 2050-2059
• 7 Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H , et al; Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) Multicenter Study Group. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (11) 1824-1836
• 8 Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW , et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (6) 818-826 , discussion 826–828
• 9 Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Fleshman J , et al. Response to editorial on hand assisted vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A multicenter randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:818–827. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 828
• 10 Fleshman J, Marcello P, Stamos MJ, Wexner SD. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS); Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Focus Group on Laparoscopic Colectomy Education as endorsed by The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49 (7) 945-949
• 11 Ross HM, Simmang CL, Fleshman JW, Marcello PW. Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation. Surg Innov 2008; 15 (3) 179-183
• 12 Wall AE, Puppala VK, Kodner IJ, Angelos P, Keune JD. Issues in surgical ethics: teaching natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery techniques to practicing surgeons. Surgery 2012; 151: 484-487