Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(02): 95-100
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1333693
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Validity of Commonly Used Adipose Tissue Body Composition Equations Relative to Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Gaelic Games Players

D. A. Doran
1   Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
,
S. Mc Geever
1   Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
,
K. D. Collins
1   Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
,
C. Quinn
1   Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
,
R. McElhone
1   Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
,
M. Scott
1   Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 12 December 2012

Publication Date:
30 July 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and adipose tissue percentage estimates (AT%) derived from regression based skinfold equations were compared. 35 Gaelic games players [20.9±1.7 years; 78.1±8.6 kg; 179.5±5.7 cm] underwent whole body fan beam DXA scans following a standardised protocol and assessment of skinfold thickness at 8 sites. Adipose tissue% from the sum of skinfolds and/or via body density were calculated for general and athlete specific equations (SKf-AT %). The relationship, i. e., proportional bias, fixed bias and random error (SEE) between DXA-AT% and AT% derived from the 6 skinfold equations were determined using least squares regression analysis. Skinfold AT% estimates were underestimated relative to DXA-AT% across all skinfold equations except that of Durnin and Wormersley [9] (D&W−∑4AT%) (16.7±3.4 vs. 16.6±4.0%). All equations demonstrated 95% prediction intervals ranges exceeding ~10%. Each equation failed to predict AT% relative to DXA within an accepted±3.5% anthropometric error rate. It is recommended that the conversion of absolute skinfold thickness to an AT% is avoided and that the skinfold equations assessed herein are not utilised in Gaelic games players. Alternate ‘sum of skinfold’ approaches should be considered.

Key words

gaelic football - anthropometry - DXA - adipose tissue - regression analysis - hurling
 

  • References

  • 1 Batterham A. Commentary on bias in Bland-Altman but not regression validity analyses. Sportscience 2004; 8: 47-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: Analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 85-93
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brick N, O’Donoghue PG. Fitness profiles of elite players in hurling and three football codes: Soccer, rugby union and Gaelic football. In: Reilly T, Cabri J, Araujo D. eds. Science and Football V. London: Routledge; 2005: 166-171
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Clarys JP, Scafoglieri A, Provyn S, Louis O, Wallace JA, De Mey J. A macro-quality evaluation of dxa variables using whole dissection, ashing, and computer tomography in pigs. Obesity 2010; 18: 1477-1485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Clarys JP, Scafoglieri A, Provyn S, Sesboue B, Van Roy P. Hazards of hydrodensitometry. J Sport Med Phys Fitness 2011; 51: 95-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Collins K, Doran DA, Reilly TP. The Physiological Demands of Hurling Match-Play. Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2010; 591-595
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Doran DA, Donnelly JP, Reilly T. eds. Kinanthropometric and Performance Characteristics of Gaelic Games Players. London: Routledge; 2003: 181-190
  • 9 Durnin JVGA, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total-body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness – measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr 1974; 32: 77-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Egan E, Reilly T, Giacomoni M, Redmond L, Turner C. Bone mineral density among female sports participants. Bone 2006; 38: 227-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Eston RG, Rowlands AV, Charlesworth S, Davies A, Hoppitt T. Prediction of dxa-determined whole body fat from skinfolds: Importance of including skinfolds from the thigh and calf in young, healthy men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 695-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Heyward V. American society of exercise physiologists methods recommendation: Body composition assessment. J Exerc Physiol 2001; 4: 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Heyward VJ, Wagner DR. Applied Body Composition Assessment. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Hopkins WG. Bias in Bland-Altman but not regression validity analyses. Sportscience 2004; 8: 42-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hopkins WG. A socratic dialogue on comparison of measures. Sportscience 2010; 14: 15-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hume P, Marfell-Jones M. The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 1333-1340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lohman TG. Advances in Body Compisition Assessment. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Lohman TG. Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: A review. Hum Biol 1981; 53: 181-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart AD, Carter JEL. eds. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. Potchefstroom: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; 2006: 1-137
  • 21 Marfell-Jones MJ. The value of the skinfold: Background assumptions, cautions, and recommendations on taking and interpreting skinfold measurments. In: KAHPERD Proceedings of the 2001 Seoul International Sports Science Congress. Seoul 2001; 313-323
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nana A, Slater GJ, Hopkins WG, Burke LM. Effects of daily activities on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition in active people. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2012; 44: 180-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nana A, Slater GJ, Hopkins WG, Burke LM. Effects of exercise sessions on dxa measurements of body composition in active people. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 O’Connor DP, Mahar MT, Laughlin MS, Jackson AS. The Bland-Altman method should not be used in regression cross-validation studies. Res Q Exerc Sport 2011; 82: 610-616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Provyn S, Scafoglieri A, Tresignie J, Bautmans I, Reilly T, Clarys JP. Quality control of 157 whole body adiposity prediction formulae in age and activity matched men. J Sport Med Phys Fit 2011; 51: 426-434
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Reeves S, Collins K. The nutritional and anthropometric status of Gaelic football players. Int J Sport Nutr Exe 2003; 13: 539-548
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Reilly T, Collins K. Science and the Gaelic sports: Gaelic football and hurling. Eur J Sport Sci 2008; 8: 231-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Reilly T, Doran D. Science and Gaelic football: A review. J Sport Sci 2001; 19: 181-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Reilly T, George K, Marfell-Jones M, Scott M, Sutton L, Wallace JA. How well do skinfold equations predict percent body fat in elite soccer players?. Int J Sports Med 2009; 30: 607-613
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Reilly T, Keane S. Seasonal variations in the fitness of elite Gaelic footballers. In: Spinks W, Reilly T, Murphy A. eds. Science and Football IV. London: Routledge; 2002: 87-88
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Reilly T, Maughan RJ, Hardy L. Body fat consensus statement of the steering groups of the british olympic association. Sports Exerc Injury 1996; 2: 46-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Reilly T, Sutton L. Methods and applications of body composition analysis. In: Bust PD. (ed.). Contemporary Ergonomics. London. Taylor and Francis: 2008: 491-495
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Scafoglieri A, Provyn S, Bautmans I, Wallace J, Sutton L, Tresignie J, Louis O, De Mey J, Clarys JP. Critical appraisal of data acquisition in body composition: Evaluation of methods, techniques and technologies on the anatomical tissue-system level, data acquisition. In: Vadursi M. ed. InTech. 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Siri WE. The gross composition of the body. Adv Biol Med Phys 1956; 4: 239-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Steiner MC, Barton RL, Singh SJ, Morgan MDL. Bedside methods versus dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for body composition measurement in COPD. Eur Respir J 2002; 19: 626-631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Stewart AD, Hannan WJ. Prediction of fat and fat-free mass in male athletes using dual x-ray absorptiometry as the reference method. J Sport Sci 2000; 18: 263-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Strudwick A, Reilly T, Doran D. Anthropometric and fitness profiles of elite players in two football codes. J Sport Med Phys Fit 2002; 42: 239-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sutton L, Scott M, Reilly T. Comparison of laboratory based and field based methods of body composition analysis. Kinathropometry XI 2008; 8-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sutton L, Scott M, Wallace J, Reilly T. Body composition of English premier league soccer players: Influence of playing position, international status, and ethnicity. J Sport Sci 2009; 27: 1019-1026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wallace J, Marfell-Jones M, George K, Reilly T. A Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measurements and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Analysis of Percent Body Fat in Football Players. Science and Football VI. London: Routledge; 2009: 364-369
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Withers RT, Craig NP, Bourdon PC, Norton KI. Bourdon PCRelative body-fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of male-athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 191-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar