Characterization of Primary and Recurrent Nodules in Liver Cirrhosis Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Which Vascular Criteria Should Be Adopted?

S. Leoni; F. Piscaglia; A. Granito; A. Borghi; M. Galassi; S. Marinelli; E. Terzi; L. Bolondi

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1335024

Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Ultraschall Med 2013; 34(3): 280-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335024

Original Article

Characterization of Primary and Recurrent Nodules in Liver Cirrhosis Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Which Vascular Criteria Should Be Adopted?

Charakterisierung primärer und rekurrierender Knoten bei Leberzirrhose mittels kontrastverstärkter Sonografie: Welche vaskulären Kriterien sind anzuwenden?

Autor*innen

S. Leoni

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
F. Piscaglia

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
A. Granito

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
A. Borghi

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
M. Galassi

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
S. Marinelli

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
E. Terzi

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
L. Bolondi

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of different vascular patterns at contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) on the characterization of small liver nodules (10 – 30 mm) in cirrhosis and to determine whether primary nodules and recurrent nodules (after a previously treated hepatocellular carcinoma) display variations in enhancement pattern.

Materials and Methods: A total of 135 cirrhotic patients were evaluated. A diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was established according to AASLD Guidelines, based on imaging (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance) or liver biopsy. All patients underwent CEUS. Different CEUS patterns were evaluated in terms of diagnostic accuracy: HYPER-HYPO: Arterial hyperenhancement followed by washout (hypoechoic appearance compared with surrounding parenchyma) in late phase; HYPER-ISO: Arterial hyperenhancement followed by isoenhancement (isoechoic appearance) in late phase; ISO-ISO: Isoenhancement in all vascular phases.

Results: A total of 155 consecutive primary (n = 90) or recurrent (n = 65) nodules were detected. HCC was diagnosed in 127 nodules (71 primary, 56 recurrent). A characteristic HYPER-HYPO CEUS pattern was revealed in 52/127 (40.9 %) HCCs (31 primary, 21 recurrent) giving a positive predictive value (PPV) of 98 % (97 % primary, 100 % recurrent) and an accuracy of 51 % (54 % primary, 46 % recurrent). A HYPER-ISO pattern was noted in 46 HCCs (31 primary, 15 recurrent). Assuming this pattern to also be indicative of HCC, the PPV and accuracy were 94 % (93 % primary, 97 % recurrent) and 77 % (84 % primary, 68 % recurrent), respectively. An ISO-ISO pattern was present in 29 HCCs (9 primary, 20 recurrent) and 22 non-HCCs (14 primary, 8 recurrent).

Conclusion: These data confirm that the HYPER-HYPO pattern at CEUS is definitely diagnostic for HCC in cirrhosis and that the HYPER-ISO pattern has a similar PPV, indicating that this pattern is highly suspicious for HCC. The ISO-ISO pattern was found in > 50 % of recurrent nodules and indicates a high risk of HCC.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Die Bewertung der Auswirkung verschiedener Durchblutungsmuster im kontrastverstärkten Ultraschall (CEUS) bei der Charakterisierung kleiner Leberknoten (10 – 30 mm) bei Zirrhose sowie die Ermittlung, ob primäre Knoten und rekurrierende Knoten (nach einem zuvor behandelten hepatozellulären Karzinom) Unterschiede im Muster der Kontrastaufnahme aufweisen.

Material und Methoden: Insgesamt wurden 135 Patienten mit Zirrhose untersucht. Die Diagnose des hepatozellulären Karzinoms (HCC) wurde gemäß der AASLD Richtlinien aufgrund der darstellenden Verfahren (Computertomografie und/oder Magnetresonanz) oder einer Leberbiopsie gestellt. Bei allen Patienten wurde ein CEUS durchgeführt. Verschiedene CEUS-Muster wurden hinsichtlich der diagnostischen Genauigkeit bewertet: HYPER-HYPO: Arterielle hyperechogene Kontrastaufnahme gefolgt vom Wash-out (Hypoechogenität im Vergleich zum umgebenden Parenchym) in der Spätphase; HYPER-ISO: Arterielle hyperechogene Kontrastaufnahme gefolgt von einer isoechogenen Kontrastaufnahme (Isoechogenität) in der Spätphase; ISO-ISO: Isoechogene Kontrastaufnahme in allen Durchblutungsphasen.

Ergebnisse: Aufeinander folgend wurden insgesamt 155 primäre (n = 90) oder rekurrierende (n = 65) Knoten entdeckt. Ein HCC wurde bei 127 Knoten (71 primär, 56 rekurrierend) diagnostiziert. Ein charakteristisches HYPER-HYPO CEUS-Muster wurde bei 52/127 (40.9 %) HCCs entdeckt (31 primär, 21 rekurrierend), was einen positiven prädiktiven Wert (PPV) von 98 % (97 % primär, 100 % rekurrierend) und eine Genauigkeit von 51 % (54 % primär, 46 % rekurrierend) ergibt. Ein HYPER-ISO Muster wurde bei 46 HCCs festgestellt (31 primär, 15 rekurrierend). In der Annahme, dass dieses Muster auch auf ein HCC schließen lässt, betrugen der PPV 94 % (93 % primär, 97 % rekurrierend) und die Genauigkeit 77 % (84 % primär, 68 % rekurrierend). Ein ISO-ISO Muster lag bei 29 HCCs vor (9 primär, 20 rekurrierend) und bei 22 Fällen mit Ausschluss eines HCCs (14 primär, 8 rekurrierend).

Schlussfolgerung: Diese Daten bestätigen, dass das HYPER-HYPO Muster im CEUS diagnostisch eindeutig für ein HCC bei Zirrhose spricht und dass das HYPER-ISO Muster einen ähnlichen PPV besitzt, was dafür spricht, dass dieses Muster höchst verdächtig für ein HCC ist. Das ISO-ISO Muster wurde in > 50 % der rekurrierenden Knoten gefunden und indiziert ein hohes HCC-Risiko.

Key words

hepatocellular carcinoma - cirrhosis - contrast-enhanced ultrasound - washout

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 2001; 35: 421-430
2 Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2005; 42: 1208-1236
3 Gaiani S, Celli N, Piscaglia F et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced perfusional sonography in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma hypervascular at spiral computed tomography. J Hepatol 2004; 41: 421-426
4 Libbrecht L, Bielen D, Verslype C et al. Focal lesions in cirrhotic explant livers: pathological evaluation and accuracy of pretransplantation imaging examinations. Liver Transpl 2002; 8: 749-761
5 Lim JH, Park CK. Hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced liver cirrhosis: CT detection in transplant patients. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 203-207
6 Brancatelli G, Baron RL, Peterson MS et al. Helical CT screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: frequency and causes of false-positive interpretation. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1007-1014
7 Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Baron RL et al. Arterially enhancing liver lesions: significance of sustained enhancement on hepatic venous and delayed phase with magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 116-124
8 Iavarone M, Sangiovanni A, Forzenigo LV et al. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis by dynamic contrast imaging: the importance of tumor cell differentiation. Hepatology 2010; 52: 1723-30
9 Boozari B, Soudah B, Rifai K et al. Grading of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma using late phase of contrast enhanced sonography – a prospective study. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 484-490
10 Jang HJ, Kim TK, Wilson SR. Small nodules (1-2 cm) in liver cirrhosis: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 418-424
11 Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of small (</= 20 mm) and subcentimetric (</= 10 mm) focal liver lesions in comparison with histology. Results of the DEGUM multicenter trial. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 593-597
12 Leoni S, Piscaglia F, Golfieri R et al. The impact of vascular and nonvascular findings on the noninvasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma based on the EASL and AASLD criteria. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 599-609
13 International Working Party. Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology 1995; 22: 983-993
14 Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 28-44
15 Rimola J, Forner A, Reig M et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis: absence of contrast washout in delayed phases by magnetic resonance imaging avoids misdiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2009; 50: 791-798
16 Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011; 53: 1020-1022
17 Edmondson HA, Steiner PE. Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer 1954; 7: 462-503
18 Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008; 47: 97-104
19 Sangiovanni A, Manini MA, Iavarone M et al. The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Gut 2010; 59: 638-644
20 Piscaglia F, Leoni S, Cabibbo G et al. Cost analysis of recall strategies for non-invasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42: 729-734
21 Dai Y, Chen MH, Fan ZH et al. Diagnosis of small hepatic nodules detected by surveillance ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis: Comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography. Hepatol Res 2008; 38: 281-290
22 Pomfret EA, Washburn K, Wald C et al. Report of a national conference on liver allocation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Liver Transpl 2010; 16: 262-278
23 Bohle W, Clemens PU, Heubach T et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for Differentiating Between Hepatocellular and Cholangiocellular Carcinoma. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: E191-E195
24 Barreiros AP, Piscaglia F, Dietrich CF. Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Comments on AASLD guidelines. J Hepatol 2012; 57: 930-932
25 Galassi M, Piscaglia F, Lucidi V et al. Rapid, marked wash-out at contrast-enhanced ultrasound in nodules in cirrhosis should raise the suspicition of cholangiocarcinoma. Abstract 1001, EASL 2011. J Hepatol 2011; 54: S398
26 Xu HX, Lu MD, Liu LN et al. Discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in cirrhotic liver using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 1376-1384
27 Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Sanada J et al. Hepatocellular nodules in liver cirrhosis: hemodynamic evaluation (angiography-assisted CT) with special reference to multi-step hepatocarcinogenesis. Abdom Imaging 2011; 36: 264-272
28 von Herbay A, Vogt C, Westendorff J et al. Correlation between SonoVue enhancement in CEUS, HCC differentiation and HCC diameter: analysis of 130 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 544-550
29 Yang H, Liu GJ, Lu MD et al. Evaluation of the vascular architecture of hepatocellular carcinoma by micro flow imaging: pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 461-467
30 Furlan A, Marin D, Cabassa P et al. Enhancement pattern of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), MDCT, and MRI: Intermodality agreement and comparison of diagnostic sensitivity between 2005 and 2010 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 2099-2105