Accuracy of Duplex Ultrasonography in Estimation of Severity of Peripheral Vascular Disease

Abstract

Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is a safe, noninvasive method for imaging vasculature when compared with conventional angiography. Our goal is to assess the accuracy of DUS compared with angiography of the lower extremities. We reviewed a total of 373 lesions in 278 patients from July 2005 through June 2010. Patients underwent DUS followed by angiography within 30 days. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) were stratified into one of four categories and compared with the angiographic findings. Seventy-five chronic total occlusions were found. Of the remaining 298 lesions, a significant relationship was found between PSV and degree of angiographic stenosis (p < 0.001). DUS was found to demonstrate a sensitivity of 79.7%, specificity of 79.2%, positive predictive value of 88.2%, and negative predictive value of 66.7% for lesions ≥ 70%. The 66.7% of the false-negative lesions with the lowest velocities were below the knee joint. DUS of the lower extremities is accurate in determining the degree of stenosis ranging from mild-to-severe disease. Some limitation may exist in estimating the degree of stenosis below the knee.

Keywords

duplex ultrasonography - contrast angiography - peripheral arterial disease

• References

• 1 Beard JD. ABC of arterial and venous disease: chronic lower limb ischaemia. BMJ 2000; 320 (7238) 854-857
• 2 Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991; 325 (7) 445-453
• 3 Bueno A, Acín F, Cañibano C, Fernandez-Casado JL, Castillo E. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2010; 44 (7) 576-585
• 4 Chen JC, Salvian AJ, Taylor DC, Teal PA, Marotta TR, Hsiang YN. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%–99%: a comparative study. Ann Vasc Surg 1998; 12 (3) 244-247
• 5 Grassbaugh JA, Nelson PR, Rzucidlo EM , et al. Blinded comparison of preoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and contrast arteriography for planning revascularization at the level of the tibia. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37 (6) 1186-1190
• 6 Langenberger H, Schillinger M, Plank C , et al. Agreement of duplex ultrasonography vs. computed tomography angiography for evaluation of native and in-stent SFA re-stenosis—findings from a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 (9) 2265-2269 Epub ahead of print
• 7 Roth SM, Back MR, Bandyk DF, Avino AJ, Riley V, Johnson BL. A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30 (3) 453-460
• 8 Slovut DP, Romero JM, Hannon KM, Dick J, Jaff MR. Detection of common carotid artery stenosis using duplex ultrasonography: a validation study with computed tomographic angiography. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51 (1) 65-70
• 9 Aburahma AF. Duplex criteria for determining ≥50% and ≥80% internal carotid artery stenosis following carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. Vascular 2011; 19 (1) 15-20
• 10 AbuRahma AF, Abu-Halimah S, Bensenhaver J , et al. Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48 (3) 589-594
• 11 AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Strickler DL, Alberts S, Young L. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. Ann Vasc Surg 1998; 12 (4) 349-358
• 12 AbuRahma AF, Stone P, Deem S, Dean LS, Keiffer T, Deem E. Proposed duplex velocity criteria for carotid restenosis following carotid endarterectomy with patch closure. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50 (2) 286-291 , e1–e2, discussion 291
• 13 Armstrong PA, Bandyk DF, Johnson BL, Shames ML, Zwiebel BR, Back MR. Duplex scan surveillance after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a rational definition of stent stenosis. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (3) 460-465 , discussion 465–466
• 14 Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J , et al. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11 (20) iii-iv , xi–xiii, 1–184
• 15 de Vries M, Ouwendijk R, Flobbe K , et al. Peripheral arterial disease: clinical and cost comparisons between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography—a multicenter randomized trial. Radiology 2006; 240 (2) 401-410
• 16 Jahromi AS, Cinà CS, Liu Y, Clase CM. Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41 (6) 962-972
• 17 Lal BK, Hobson II RW, Tofighi B, Kapadia I, Cuadra S, Jamil Z. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47 (1) 63-73
• 18 AbuRahma AF, Elmore M, Deel J, Mullins B, Hayes J. Complications of diagnostic arteriography performed by a vascular surgeon in a recent series of 558 patients. Vascular 2007; 15 (2) 92-97
• 19 Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke 2003; 34 (5) 1324-1332
• 20 Shrikhande GV, Graham AR, Aparajita R , et al. Determining criteria for predicting stenosis with ultrasound duplex after endovascular intervention in infrainguinal lesions. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25 (4) 454-460
• 21 Solomon R, Dauerman HL. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Circulation 2010; 122 (23) 2451-2455