Download PDF
Evid Based Spine Care J 2013; 04(01): 013-017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1341598
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Early Morbidity of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Plating for Spondylosis: Does the Number of Levels Influence Early Complications? A Single Surgeon's Experience in 519 Consecutive Patients

Dennis E. Bullard
1   Triangle Neurosurgery PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
3   Clinical Consulting Faculty, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
,
Jillian S. Valentine
1   Triangle Neurosurgery PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 September 2012

05 December 2012

Publication Date:
01 May 2013 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Study Design This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating (ACDFP) cases.

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate within a clinical practice evidence-based results of short-term morbidity with multilevel ACDFP.

Methods Clinical morbidity, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) and Odom scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), hardware failure, and return-to-work (RTW) status were prospectively collected in an electronic database for 678 patients who underwent 1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-level ACDFP during an 8-year period. A total of 519 patients met the study criteria and were retrospectively analyzed.

Results The majority of all patients noted “Excellent” or “Good” status for 1 month (91%), 2 months (92%), and 3 months (96%). Patients with 1-, 2-, and 3-level ACDFP returned to work sooner, 60% at 1 month, 70% at 2 months, and 68% at 3 months. For 4-level patients, the majority did not RTW until 3 months (71%). The only significant increase in morbidity with increasing levels was hospital stay for 3- and 4-level ACDFP and RTW for 4-level ACDFP.

Conclusion Multilevel ACDFP can be performed with low initial morbidity. An individual practice can review results to allow for ongoing evidence-based care.

Final class of evidence - treatment

Yes

Study design

 RCT

 Cohort

•

 Case control

 Case series

Methods

 Concealed allocation (RCT)

 Intention to treat (RCT)

 Blinded/independent evaluation of primary outcome

•

 F/U ≥ 85%

 Adequate sample size

•

 Control for confounding

Overall class of evidence

III

Keywords

ACDFP - cervical spine - morbidity

Previous Presentations of Paper

A portion of this work was presented as an electronic poster at the 2010 American Association of Neurological Surgeons meeting in Philadelphia, PA, and as an invited talk at the North Carolina Spine Society meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina, August 27 to 28, 2010.


Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A (3) 607-624
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bolesta MJ, Rechtine II GR, Chrin AM. Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: a prospective study. Spine 2000; 25 (16) 2040-2044 , discussion 2045–2046
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA. Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 1992; 17 (10) (Suppl): S427-S430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Emery SE, Bolesta MJ, Banks MA, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques. Spine 1994; 19 (6) 660-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Emery SE, Fisher JRS, Bohlman HH. Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiographic and clinical results. Spine 1997; 22 (22) 2622-2624 , discussion 2625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hillard VH, Apfelbaum RI. Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for multilevel cervical discectomy. Spine J 2006; 6 (6, Suppl): 242S-251S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Koller H, Hempfing A, Ferraris L, Maier O, Hitzl W, Metz-Stavenhagen P. 4- and 5-level anterior fusions of the cervical spine: review of literature and clinical results. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (12) 2055-2071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wang JC, McDonough PW, Kanim LE, Endow KK, Delamarter RB. Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 2001; 26 (6) 643-646 , discussion 646–647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine 2005; 30 (19) 2138-2144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 DeLong WB, Polissar N, Neradilek B. Author reply. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 8 (5) 495-496
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fraser JF, Härtl R. Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 (4) 298-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

    • References Editorial Perspective

    • 1 Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine 2002; 27 (22) 2453-2458
      Google Scholar