Download PDF
Psychiatr Prax 2013; 40(04): 192-199
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343100
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die Lebenszeitprävalenz psychischer Störungen in Vorpommern

Welchen Einfluss haben frühere psychische Auffälligkeiten auf die Survey-Teilnahme und Prävalenzschätzungen? Ergebnisse der SHIP-StudieThe Lifetime Prevalence of Mental Disorders in North-Eastern GermanyWhat is the Influence of Earlier Mental Morbidity on Survey Participation and Prevalence Estimates? Results from the SHIP-Study
Carsten Oliver Schmidt
1   Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
Anna-Bettina Watzke
2   Psychotherapeutische Praxis, Gristow
,
Andrea Schulz
3   Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
Sebastian E. Baumeister
1   Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
Harald J. Freyberger
3   Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
4   Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald at HELIOS Hanse-Klinikum Stralsund
,
Hans-Jörgen Grabe
3   Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
4   Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald at HELIOS Hanse-Klinikum Stralsund
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 April 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Untersucht werden die Lebenszeitprävalenz psychischer Störungen in Vorpommern und Effekte selektiver Studienteilnahme.

Methodik: Analysen basieren auf einer Kohortenstudie (SHIP) mit M-CIDI-Diagnosen bei 2400 Erwachsenen (29 – 89 Jahre).

Ergebnisse: Die Hälfte der Teilnehmer erfüllte die Kriterien mindestens einer ICD-Diagnose einschließlich Tabakabhängigkeit und einfacher Phobien. Frühere psychische Auffälligkeiten waren kaum mit der Studienteilnahme assoziiert.

Schlussfolgerung: Belegt wird die hohe Prävalenz psychischer Störungen, selektive Teilnahme hatte kaum Einfluss auf Prävalenzschätzungen.

Abstract

Objective: This work addresses the life-time-prevalence of mental disorders in the adult general population in a German region (Vorpommern). We address effects of attrition on prevalence estimates.

Methods: Analyses are based on a general population cohort study (29 – 89 years, Study of Health in Pomerania, N = 2400), using the M-CIDI to obtain life-time diagnoses of mental disorders according to ICD-10. Statistical weights were used to assess the effects of selective non-response on prevalence estimates related to baseline physical and psychological morbidity and sociodemographic variables, measured 10 years before.

Results: In total 44.6 % of the male and 55.2 % of the female participants fulfilled criteria for at least one ICD mental disorder including specific phobias and tobacco dependence. Physical but not psychological baseline morbidity showed relevant associations to participation in the psychological examination ten years later. Weighted and unweighted prevalence estimates for mental disorders were very similar.

Conclusion: Our results illustrate the high burden due to mental disorders. Most prevalence estimates seem robust to prior mental comorbidities.

Schlüsselwörter

psychische Störungen - Prävalenz - Allgemeinbevölkerung - Selektionsbias - Kohortenstudie

Keywords

mental disorders - prevalence - general population - attrition - cohort study
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J et al. The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21: 655-679
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Wittchen HU, Jacobi F. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe – a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15: 357-376
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Robins LN, Wing J, Wittchen HU et al. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45: 1069-1077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jacobi F, Wittchen HU, Holting C et al. Prevalence, co-morbidity and correlates of mental disorders in the general population: results from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey (GHS). Psychol Med 2004; 34: 597-611
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Jacobi F, Klose M, Wittchen HU. Psychische Störungen in der deutschen Allgemeinbevölkerung: Inanspruchnahme von Gesundheitsleistungen und Ausfalltage. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2004; 47: 736-744
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jacobi F, Wittchen HU, Holting C et al. Estimating the prevalence of mental and somatic disorders in the community: aims and methods of the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2002; 11: 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wittchen HU, Pfister H. DIA-X Manual: Instruktionsmanual zur Durchführung von DIA-X (M-CIDI) Interviews. Frankfurt: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Hapke U et al. Lebenszeitprävalenz psychischer Störungen in der erwachsenen Allgemeinbevölkerung. Ergebnisse der TACOS-Studie. Nervenarzt 2000; 71: 535-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Hapke U et al. Prevalence of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders including nicotine dependence in the general population: results from the northern german TACOS study. Neurol Psychiatr Br 2001; 9: 75-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004; 109 (Suppl. 420): 21-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gunther OH, Friemel S, Bernert S et al. Die Krankheitslast von depressiven Erkrankungen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse aus dem Projekt European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD). Psychiat Prax 2007; 34: 292-301
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wittchen HU, Jacobi F. Was sind die häufigsten psychischen Störungen in Deutschland?. Im Internet: http://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Studien/Degs/degs_w1/Symposium/degs_psychische_stoerungen.pdf?__blob=publicationFile RKI; Stand: 15.01.2013
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Maercker A, Forstmeier S, Wagner B et al. Posttraumatische Belastungsstörungen in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer gesamtdeutschen epidemiologischen Untersuchung. Nervenarzt 2008; 79: 577-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Perkonigg A, Pfister H, Stein MB et al. Longitudinal course of posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a community sample of adolescents and young adults. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1320-1327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jacobi F, Hoyer J, Wittchen HU. Seelische Gesundheit in Ost und West: Analysen auf der Grundlage des Bundesgesundheitssurveys. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 2004; 33: 251-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kamtsiuris P, Lange M. Eckdaten der Studie: Wer hat teilgenommen?. Im Internet: www.rki.de/DE/Content/.../Degs/BGBl_2012_55_775-780.pdf RKI; Stand: 15.01.2013
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Schmidt CO, Raspe H, Pfingsten M et al. Does attrition bias longitudinal population-based studies on back pain?. Eur J Pain 2011; 15: 84-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Thefeld W, Stolzenberg H, Bellach BM. The Federal Health Survey: response, composition of participants and non-responder analysis. Gesundheitswesen 1999; 61(Spec No): S57-S61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 de Graaf R, Bijl RV, Smit F et al. Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study: The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 1039-1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Volkert J, Schulz H, Harter M et al. The prevalence of mental disorders in older people in Western countries – a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2012; 12: 339-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wittchen HU, Lachner G, Wunderlich U et al. Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33: 568-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Höfler M, Pfister H, Lieb R et al. The use of weights to account for non-response and drop-out. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005; 40: 291-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Volzke H, Alte D, Schmidt CO et al. Cohort Profile: The Study of Health in Pomerania. Int J Epidemiol 2011; 40: 294-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 WHO. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Saß H, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M et al. Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Störungen – Textrevision – DSM-IV-TR. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 26 APA. DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th. edition. Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Lachner G, Wittchen HU, Perkonigg A et al. Structure, content and reliability of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) substance use sections. Eur Addict Res 1998; 4: 28-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wittchen HU. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO – Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res 1994; 28: 57-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wittchen HU, Zaudig M, Fydrich T. Skid. Strukturiertes klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse I und II. Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Wittchen HU, Höfler M, Gander F et al. Screening for mental disorders: performance of the Composite International Diagnostic – Screener (CID–S). Int J Methods Psychiatric Research 1999; 8: 59-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Salyers MP, Bosworth HB, Swanson JW et al. Reliability and validity of the SF-12 health survey among people with severe mental illness. Med Care 2000; 38: 1141-1150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pfeffermann D. The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1996; 5: 239-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Royston P, Sauerbrei W. Multivariable Model – Building: A Pragmatic Approach to Regression Analysis based on Fractional Polynomials for Modelling Continuous Variables. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Schmidt CO, Alte D, Volzke H et al. Partial misspecification of survey design features sufficed to severely bias estimates of health-related outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 64: 416-423
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of health surveys. New York: John Wiley; 1999
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Allison PM. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Grabe HJ, Meyer C, Hapke U et al. Prevalence, quality of life and psychosocial function in obsessive-compulsive disorder and subclinical obsessive-compulsive disorder in northern Germany. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 250: 262-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Grabe HJ, Meyer C, Hapke U et al. Specific somatoform disorder in the general population. Psychosomatics 2003; 44: 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Grabe HJ, Meyer C, Hapke U et al. Somatoform pain disorder in the general population. Psychother Psychosom 2003; 72: 88-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Beesdo K, Hofler M, Leibenluft E et al. Mood episodes and mood disorders: patterns of incidence and conversion in the first three decades of life. Bipolar Disord 2009; 11: 637-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A et al. How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainment. Psychol Med 2010; 40: 899-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Patten SB. Accumulation of major depressive episodes over time in a prospective study indicates that retrospectively assessed lifetime prevalence estimates are too low. BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Glaesmer H, Kallert TW, Brahler E et al. Die Prävalenz depressiver Beschwerden in der älteren Bevölkerung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und die Bedeutung methodischer Aspekte fur die identifizierten Prävalenzen. Psychiat Prax 2010; 37: 71-77
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L, Berglund G et al. Non-participants in a general population study of men, with special reference to social and alcoholic problems. Acta Med Scand 1987; 221: 243-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Haapea M, Miettunen J, Laara E et al. Non-participation in a field survey with respect to psychiatric disorders. Scand J Public Health 2008; 36: 728-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Haapea M, Miettunen J, Veijola J et al. Non-participation may bias the results of a psychiatric survey: an analysis from the survey including magnetic resonance imaging within the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007; 42: 403-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Grabe HJ, Schulz A, Schmidt CO et al. Ein Screeninginstrument für Missbrauch und Vernachlässigung in der Kindheit: der Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS). Psychiat Prax 2012; 39: 109-115
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Schulz H, Barghaan D, Harfst T et al. Psychotherapeutische Versorgung. In: Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Grabe HJ, Alte D, Adam C et al. Seelische Belastung und Inanspruchnahme psychiatrischer und psychotherapeutischer Versorgung. Psychiat Prax 2005; 32: 299-303
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar