Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39(05): 541-548
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343356
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Venous Thromboembolism after Traumatic Brain Injury

Herb A. Phelan
1   Division of Burns/Trauma/Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 April 2013 (online)

Abstract

No standard exists for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Caregivers agree that there is an early time point after injury in which the chances of spontaneous injury progression are high and the risks of prophylactic anticoagulation are excessive, and that these injuries eventually stabilize to the point that anticoagulation may be safely started. Translating this consensus into an application that can inform bedside decision making has not occurred. National groups have promulgated guidelines in the United States suggesting that anticoagulants be used when the risk of renewed intracranial hemorrhage has ceased with no guidance beyond this vague recommendation. This is largely due to the relative paucity of literature about pharmacologic prophylaxis, which has in turn been due to fears of propagation of intracranial hemorrhage. Although interest in this field has increased of late, many studies are limited by the simple dichotomization of TBI patients as having the presence or absence of intracranial blood. Although methodologically easier, this approach does not account for the heterogeneity of TBI and, consequently, the spectrum of time to stabilization. To address this, our group has created an algorithm which stratifies patients by risk for spontaneous progression and tailors a unique VTE prophylaxis regimen to each arm.

 
  • References

  • 1 Langlois J, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas K. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nation Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2004
  • 2 Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM, Chen E, Szalai JP. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 (24) 1601-1606
  • 3 Kahn SR, Shbaklo H, Lamping DL , et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life during the 2 years following deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (7) 1105-1112
  • 4 Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR , et al. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma 1993; 34 (2) 216-222
  • 5 Rogers FB, Cipolle MD, Velmahos GC, Rozycki G, Luchette FA. Practice management guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: The EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma 2002; 53: 142-164
  • 6 Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J , et al; Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. V. Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 (Suppl. 01) S32-S36
  • 7 Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM , et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: ACCP Evidence-based guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: S227-S277
  • 8 Constantini S, Kanner A, Friedman A , et al. Safety of perioperative minidose heparin in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Neurosurg 2001; 94 (6) 918-921
  • 9 Agnelli G, Piovella F, Buoncristiani P , et al. Enoxaparin plus compression stockings compared with compression stockings alone in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective neurosurgery. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 (2) 80-85
  • 10 Dickinson L, Miller L, Patel C, Gupta S. Enoxaparin increases the incidence of postoperative intracranial hemorrhage when initiated preoperatively for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with brain tumors. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 1074-1081
  • 11 Hamilton MG, Yee WH, Hull RD, Ghali WA. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (3) 571-581
  • 12 Geerts WH, Jay RM, Code KI , et al. A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med 1996; 335 (10) 701-707
  • 13 Knudson MM, Morabito D, Paiement GD, Shackleford S. Use of low molecular weight heparin in preventing thromboembolism in trauma patients. J Trauma 1996; 41 (3) 446-459
  • 14 Gearhart MM, Luchette FA, Proctor MC , et al. The risk assessment profile score identifies trauma patients at risk for deep vein thrombosis. Surgery 2000; 128 (4) 631-640
  • 15 Kim J, Gearhart MM, Zurick A, Zuccarello M, James L, Luchette FA. Preliminary report on the safety of heparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after severe head injury. J Trauma 2002; 53 (1) 38-42 , discussion 43
  • 16 Kurtoglu M, Yanar H, Bilsel Y , et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma: intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin. World J Surg 2004; 28 (8) 807-811
  • 17 Cothren CC, Smith WR, Moore EE, Morgan SJ. Utility of once-daily dose of low molecular weight heparin to prevent VTE in multisystem trauma patients. World J Surg 2007; 31 (1) 98-104
  • 18 Depew AJ, Hu CK, Nguyen AC, Driessen N. Thromboembolic prophylaxis in blunt traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: a retrospective review. Am Surg 2008; 74 (10) 906-911
  • 19 Levy A, Salottolo R, Bar-Or R , et al. Pharmacologic prophlaxis is a risk factor for hemorrhage progression in a subset of patients with TBI. J Trauma 2010; 68 (4) 886-894
  • 20 Dudley R, Aziz I, Bonnici A , et al. Early venous thromboembolic event prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury with low-molecular-weight heparin: risks and benefits. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27: 2165-2172
  • 21 Saadeh Y, Gohil K, Bill C , et al. Chemical VTE prophylaxis is safe and effective for TBI patients when started 24 hours after the absence of hemorrhage progression on head CT. J Trauma 2012; 73: 426-430
  • 22 Koehler D, Shipman J, Davidson M, Guillamondegui O. Is early venous thromboembolism prophylaxis safe in trauma patients with intracranial hemorrhage?. J Trauma 2011; 70: 324-329
  • 23 Minshall CT, Eriksson EA, Leon SM, Doben AR, McKinzie BP, Fakhry SM. Safety and efficacy of heparin or enoxaparin prophylaxis in blunt trauma patients with a head abbreviated injury severity score >2. J Trauma 2011; 71 (2) 396-399 , discussion 399–400
  • 24 Scudday T, Brasel K, Webb T , et al. Safety and efficacy of prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213 (1) 148-153 , discussion 153–154
  • 25 Reiff DA, Haricharan RN, Bullington NM, Griffin RL, McGwin Jr G, Rue III LW. Traumatic brain injury is associated with the development of deep vein thrombosis independent of pharmacological prophylaxis. J Trauma 2009; 66 (5) 1436-1440
  • 26 Salottolo K, Offner P, Levy A, Mains C, Slone D, Bar-Or D. Interrupted pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis increases venous thromboembolism in traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2011; 70: 19-26
  • 27 Kwiatt ME, Patel MS, Ross SE , et al. Is low-molecular-weight heparin safe for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with TBI? A Western Trauma Association multicenter study. J Trauma 2012; 73: 625-628
  • 28 Norwood S, Berne J, Rowe S, Villarreal D, Ledlie J. Early venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with enoxaparin in patients with blunt traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2008; 65: 1021-1027
  • 29 Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC. Twenty-year clinical experience with the Greenfield filter. Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 3 (2) 199-205
  • 30 Moore PS, Andrews JS, Craven TE , et al. Trends in vena caval interruption. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (1) 118-125 , e3, discussion 125–126
  • 31 Duszak Jr R, Parker L, Levin DC, Rao VM. Placement and removal of inferior vena cava filters: national trends in the medicare population. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8 (7) 483-489
  • 32 Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (14) 1541-1545
  • 33 Shackford SR, Cook A, Rogers FB, Littenberg B, Osler T. The increasing use of vena cava filters in adult trauma victims: data from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma 2007; 63 (4) 764-769
  • 34 Phelan HA, Gonzalez RP, Scott WW, White C, McClure M, Minei JP. Long-term follow-up of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients. J Trauma 2009; 67: 485-489
  • 35 Ferris EJ, McCowan TC, Carver DK, McFarland DR. Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients. Radiology 1993; 188 (3) 851-856
  • 36 Simon M, Athanasoulis CA, Kim D , et al. Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filter: initial clinical experience. Work in progress. Radiology 1989; 172 (1) 99-103
  • 37 Greenfield LJ, Cho KJ, Proctor M , et al. Results of a multicenter study of the modified hook-titanium Greenfield filter. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14 (3) 253-257
  • 38 Messmer JM, Greenfield LJ. Greenfield caval filters: long-term radiographic follow-up study. Radiology 1985; 156 (3) 613-618
  • 39 Pais SO, Tobin KD, Austin CB, Queral L. Percutaneous insertion of the Greenfield inferior vena cava filter: experience with ninety-six patients. J Vasc Surg 1988; 8 (4) 460-464
  • 40 Mewissen MW, Erickson SJ, Foley WD , et al. Thrombosis at venous insertion sites after inferior vena caval filter placement. Radiology 1989; 173 (1) 155-157
  • 41 PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 2005; 112 (3) 416-422
  • 42 Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC , et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable IVC filters in trauma patients: an AAST study. J Trauma 2007; 62: 17-24 , discussion 24–25
  • 43 McMurtry AL, Owings JT, Anderson JT, Battistella FD, Gosselin R. Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189 (3) 314-320
  • 44 Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI , et al. Retrievable vena cava filters for preventing pulmonary embolism in trauma patients: a cautionary tale. J Trauma 2006; 60 (1) 35-40
  • 45 Cherry RA, Nichols PA, Snavely TM, David MT, Lynch FC. Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters: do they make a difference in trauma patients?. J Trauma 2008; 65 (3) 544-548
  • 46 Knudson MM, Gomez D, Haas B, Cohen MJ, Nathens AB. Three thousand seven hundred thirty-eight posttraumatic pulmonary emboli: a new look at an old disease. Ann Surg 2011; 254 (4) 625-632
  • 47 Rajasekhar A, Lottenberg R, Lottenberg L, Liu H, Ang D. Pulmonary embolism prophylaxis with inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: a systematic review using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 32 (1) 40-46
  • 48 Velmahos GC, Kern J, Chan LS, Oder D, Murray JA, Shekelle P. Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: an evidence-based report—part I: analysis of risk factors and evaluation of the role of vena caval filters. J Trauma 2000; 49 (1) 132-138 , discussion 139
  • 49 Brakenridge SC, Henley S, Golden R , et al. Comparing clinical predictors of DVT versus pulmonary embolus after severe blunt traumatic injury: A new paradigm for post-traumatic venous thromboembolism?. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; September 14, 2012; Kauai, HI
  • 50 Phelan HA, Eastman AL, Madden CJ , et al. TBI risk stratification at presentation: a prospective study of the incidence and timing of radiographic worsening in the Parkland Protocol. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73 (2, Suppl 1)) S122-S127
  • 51 Phelan HA, Wolf SE, Norwood SH , et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial of anticoagulation in low-risk TBI: The Delayed vs Early Enoxaparin Prophylaxis I study. J Trauma 2012; 73: 1434-1441
  • 52 AbdelFattah KR, Wolf SE, Scott WW , et al. Determinants and Timing of Radiographic Stabilization of Intracranial Hemorrhage after Neurosurgical Procedures for TBI. Paper presented at: Neurocritical Care Society; October 5, 2012; Denver CO
  • 53 Hartert H. Blutgerinnungstudien mit der thromboelastographic, einen neven untersuchungsverfahren. Klin Wochenschr 1948; 16: 257
  • 54 Kunio NR, Differding JA, Watson KM , et al. Thrombelastography identified coagulopathy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after traumatic brain injury. Am J Surg 2012; 203: 584-588
  • 55 Rowell S. The use of thromboelastography to predict progression of intracranial hemorrhage. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; September 14, 2012; Kauai, HI