Rectal Pouch Index: A Prognostic Indicator for Constipation after Surgery for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations

Abstract

Background and Introduction Constipation following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) is common. We correlated the dimensions of rectal pouch before PSARP with the postoperative bowel habit. Classical PSARP was modified with tapering of rectal pouch by plication of its walls thus preserving the internal sphincter because we believe that this preserves continence and lead to better results. It was observed that a distinct relationship exists between the preoperative size of the rectal pouch and constipation.

Aim The aim of this study is to correlate the dimensions of preoperative rectal pouch with postoperative constipation.

Materials and Methods PSARP was performed (n: 45) in anorectal malformations using an indigenous muscle stimulator. Before PSARP, a distal cologram via high sigmoid colostomy was performed. All the distal cologram were performed by a single senior radiologist and the pressure was kept constant between 15 and 20 cm of water while filling to rule out the confounding factor related to incomplete filling. Rectum index was calculated as follows: The maximum radiological diameter of the rectum within the pelvis in the sagittal plane was multiplied by the maximum diameter of the rectum in the frontal plane. The result of this calculation was divided by the product of multiplying the distance between the ischial spines and the distance between the posterior surface of the pubic symphysis and the anterior surface of the last sacral vertebrae.

Results Symptomatic constipation requiring treatment developed in 25 patients (48%). None of these patients had anal stenosis or stricture. Constipation was managed by dietary measures and laxatives. Fifteen patients (60%) had grade 1 constipation and responded favorably. Eight and two patients had grades 2 and 3 constipation, respectively. Those patients who had a rectal pouch index of less than 0.8 had mild constipation grades 0 and 1, whereas those in whom the rectal pouch index was more than 0.8 had severe degrees of constipation (grades 2 and 3).

Conclusion Measuring the rectal pouch index can help in identifying the group which is likely to develop constipation after PSARP. These patients can be put on bowel training early on, after the colostomy closure, instead of waiting.

Keywords

rectal pouch index - constipation - PSARP - rectal placation - ARM

• References

• 1 deVries PA, Peña A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 1982; 17 (5) 638-643
• 2 Rintala RJ. Postoperative internal sphincter function in anorectal malformations- a manometric study. Pediatr Surg Int 1990; 5 (2) 127-130
• 3 Frenckner B, Husberg B. Internal anal sphincter function after correction of imperforate anus. Pediatr Surg Int 1991; 6 (3) 202-206
• 4 Pena A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: results in the management of 332 cases of anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 1988; 3 (2-3) 94-104
• 5 Peña A, Hong A. Advances in the management of anorectal malformations. Am J Surg 2000; 180 (5) 370-376
• 6 Hedlund H, Peña A, Rodriguez G, Maza J. Long-term anorectal function in imperforate anus treated by a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: manometric investigation. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27 (7) 906-909
• 7 Rintala R, Lindahl H, Lohimimo I. Anorectal malformations: results of treatment and follow up in 208 patients. Pediatr Surg Int 1991; 6 (1) 36-41
• 8 Wangensteen OH, Rice CO. Imperforate anus. A method of determining the surgical approach. Ann Surg 1930; 92 (1) 77-81
• 9 Stephens FD, Smith ED. Anorectal Malformations in Children. Chicago, IL: Year Book; 1971: 346-350
• 10 Rintala R, Lindahl H, Marttinen E, Sariola H. Constipation is a major functional complication after internal sphincter-saving posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high and intermediate anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28 (8) 1054-1058
• 11 Brent L, Stephens FD. Primary rectal ectasia. A quantitative study of smooth muscle cells in normal and hypertrophied human bowel. Prog Pediatr Surg 1976; 9: 41-62
• 12 Meier-Ruge WA, Holschneider AM. Histopathologic observations of anorectal abnormalities in anal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16 (1-2) 2-7
• 13 Langemeijer RATM, Molenaar JC. Continence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26 (5) 587-590
• 14 Peña A, el Behery ME. Megasigmoid: a source of pseudoincontinence in children with repaired anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28 (2) 199-203
• 15 Peña A, Guardino K, Tovilla JM, Levitt MA, Rodriguez G, Torres R. Bowel management for fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (1) 133-137
• 16 Huang CF, Lee HC, Yeung CY , et al. Constipation is a major complication after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations in children. Pediatr Neonatol 2012; 53 (4) 252-256
• 17 Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG. Fecal continence in patients having undergone posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure for a high anorectal malformation improves at adolescence, as constipation disappears. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36 (8) 1218-1221
• 18 Caldaro T, Romeo E, De Angelis P , et al. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformations: new discoveries. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (5) 956-963
• 19 Burjonrappa S, Youssef S, Lapierre S, Bensoussan A, Bouchard S. Megarectum after surgery for anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (4) 762-768