PDF herunterladen
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74(05): 300-304
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348025
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Quantitative Comparison of Retrosigmoid Intradural Suprameatal Approach and Retrosigmoid Transtentorial Approach: Implications for Tumors in the Petroclival Region

Sudheer Ambekar
1   Department of Neurosurgery, LSUHSC-S, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
,
Chiazo Amene
2   Department of Neurosurgery, LSUHSC-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
,
Ashish Sonig
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
,
Bharat Guthikonda
1   Department of Neurosurgery, LSUHSC-S, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
,
Anil Nanda
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

20. Dezember 2012

22. April 2013

Publikationsdatum:
13. Juni 2013 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Retrosigmoid transtentorial (RTT) and retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal (RISA) approaches have been used in the treatment of petroclival tumors.

Objective To compare the area of exposure of brainstem and petroclival region obtained through RTT and RISA in cadaveric specimens.

Methods Five cadaveric specimens with a total of 10 sides were analyzed. RTT and RISA were performed on five sides each. Brainstem and petroclival surface exposure were measured using both the approaches. These values were compared between the two approaches.

Results Brainstem area exposure with RTT was 441 ± 63 mm2 and that with RISA was 311 ± 61 mm2. Student's t-test revealed that the difference was significant (p = 0.01). The area of petroclival exposure medial to the Meckel cave through RTT was 696 ± 57 mm2, and that through RISA was 716 ± 51 mm2 (p = 0.69). The area of brainstem exposure between V and VII–VII complex through RTT and RISA was 387 ± 86 mm2 and 378 ± 76 mm2 (p = 0.87).

Conclusion The RTT approach is an excellent approach to ventrolateral brainstem and petroclival region. It provides greater superoventral exposure of the ventrolateral brainstem than RISA and provides similar petroclival exposure.

Keywords

petroclival meningioma - retrosigmoid - suprameatal - transtentorial
 

  • References

  • 1 Samii M, Ammirati M. The combined supra-infratentorial pre-sigmoid sinus avenue to the petro-clival region. Surgical technique and clinical applications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1988; 95 (1-2) 6-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Spetzler RF, Daspit CP, Pappas CT. The combined supra- and infratentorial approach for lesions of the petrous and clival regions: experience with 46 cases. J Neurosurg 1992; 76 (4) 588-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chanda A, Nanda A. Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach: advantages and disadvantages from an anatomical perspective. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1) (Suppl. 01) ONS1-ONS6 , discussion ONS1–ONS6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 House WF, De la Cruz A, Hitselberger WE. Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology 1978; 86 (5) ORL-770-ORL-779
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hsu FP, Anderson GJ, Dogan A , et al. Extended middle fossa approach: quantitative analysis of petroclival exposure and surgical freedom as a function of successive temporal bone removal by using frameless stereotaxy. J Neurosurg 2004; 100 (4) 695-699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kanzaki J, Kawase T, Sano K, Shiobara R, Toya S. A modified extended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic tumors. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1977; 217 (1) 119-121
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T. Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 1985; 63 (6) 857-861
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Malis LI. The petrosal approach. Clin Neurosurg 1991; 37: 528-540
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Chang EF, Lawton MT. The extended retrosigmoid approach: an alternative to radical cranial base approaches for posterior fossa lesions. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (4) (Suppl. 02) ONS-208-ONS-214 , discussion ONS-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Koerbel A, Kirschniak A, Ebner FH, Tatagiba M, Gharabaghi A. The retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to posterior cavernous sinus: microsurgical anatomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35 (4) 368-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mathiesen T, Gerlich A, Kihlström L, Svensson M, Bagger-Sjöbäck D. Effects of using combined transpetrosal surgical approaches to treat petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (6) 982-991 , discussion 991–992
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nanda A, Javalkar V, Banerjee AD. Petroclival meningiomas: study on outcomes, complications and recurrence rates. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (5) 1268-1277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, Morita A. Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (6) 965-979 , discussion 979–981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel's cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (2) 235-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kawamata T, Katayama Y. [Lateral supracerebellar transtentorial approach for petroclival lesions]. No Shinkei Geka 2006; 34 (6) 567-575
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Seoane E, Rhoton Jr AL. Suprameatal extension of the retrosigmoid approach: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 1999; 44 (3) 553-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Campbell E, Whitfield RD. Posterior fossa meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1948; 5 (2) 131-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Russell JR, Bucy PC. Meningiomas of the posterior fossa. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1953; 96 (2) 183-192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Park CK, Jung HW, Kim JE, Paek SH, Kim DG. The selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy for petroclival meningiomas. Surg Neurol 2006; 66 (2) 160-165 , discussion 165–166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zentner J, Meyer B, Vieweg U, Herberhold C, Schramm J. Petroclival meningiomas: is radical resection always the best option?. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62 (4) 341-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, Morita A. Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (6) 965-979 , discussion 979–981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Watanabe T, Katayama Y, Fukushima T, Kawamata T. Lateral supracerebellar transtentorial approach for petroclival meningiomas: operative technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (1) 49-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar