Download PDF
intensiv 2013; 21(05): 245-251
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1355143
Intensivpflege
Stuhlinkontinenz
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Professionelle Pflegestrategien bei Stuhlinkontinenz

Oliver Rothaug
1   Operative Intensivstation 0117/0118, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
,
Tilmann Müller-Wolff
,
Arnold Kaltwasser
,
Rolf Dubb
,
Carsten Hermes
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 September 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Bei Intensivpatienten mit Stuhlinkontinenz besteht ein hohes Infektionsrisiko für Haut, Weichteile, Harnwege sowie für allgemein nosokomiale Infektionen. Dabei hat sich die Behandlung und Pflege inzwischen grundlegend geändert. Warum traditionelle Versorgungsmaßnahmen nicht mehr empfohlen werden und welche Strategien heute geeignet sind.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Junkin J, Selekof JL. Prevalence of incontinence and associated skin injury in the acute care inpatient. JWOC Nurs 2007; 34 (3) 260-269
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bliss DZ, Johnson S, Savik K et al. Fecal incontinence in hospitalized patients who are acutely ill. Nurs Res 2000; 49 (2) 101-108
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gray M. Preventing and managing perineal dermatitis: a shared goal for wound and continence care. JWOC Nurs 2004; (Suppl. 01) S2-S9
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Dorman BP, Hill C, McGrath M et al. Bowelmanagement in the intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2004; 20: 320-329
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 García CB, Binks R, De Luca E et al. Prevalence, management and clinical challenges associated with acute faecal incontinence in the ICU and critical care settings: The FIRST™ cross-sectional descriptive survey. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2012; 28 (4) 242-250
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dubberke ER, Gerding DN, Classen D et al. Strategies to prevent Clostridium difficile infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29 (Suppl. 01) S81-S92
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Padmanabhan A, Stern M, Wishin J et al. Clinical evaluation of a flexible fecal incontinence management system. Am J Crit Care 2007; 16 (4) 384-393
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Timmons JP. Skin physiology and wound healing. Wounds Essentials 2006; 1: 8-17
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Verhage S et al. Prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: literature review. J Clin Nurs 2009; 65 (6) 1141-1154
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Beldon P. Moisturelesions: the effect of urine and faeces on the skin. Wound Essentials 2008; 3: 82-87
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E et al. Incontinence in the aged: contact dermatitis and other cutaneous consequences. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 211-217
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Faria DT, Shwayder T, Krull EA et al. Perineal skin injury: extrinsic environmental factors. Ostomy Wound Management 1996; 42 (7) 28-34
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Ousey K, Bianchi J, Beldon P et al. The identification and management of moisture lesions. Wounds UK 2012; 8 (2) (Suppl. 03)
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Gray M, Bliss D, Doughty D et al. Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a consensus. JWOC Nurs 2007; 34: 45-54
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Cutting KF, White RJ. Maceration of the skin: 1: the nature and causes of skin maceration. J Wound Care 2002; 11 (7) 275-278
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Bardsley A. Innovations in the management of faecal incontinence. Continence UK 2008; 2 (1)
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Beldon P. Faecal incontinence and its impact on wound care. Continence Essentials 2008; 1: 22-27
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Moore DJ, Subramanyan K et al. Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatologic Therapy 2004; 17: 16-25
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Beeckmann D. Prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: Literatur review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 665 (6) 1141-1154
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Donskey CJ. The Role of the Intestinal Tract as a Reservoir and Source for Transmission of Nosocomial Pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 219-226
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mayer RA, Geha RC, Helfand MS et al. The role of fecal incontinence in contamination of the environment with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31: 221-225
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Birdsall C. Would you put a Foley in the rectum?. Am J Nurs 1986; 29 (4) 193-201
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Grogan TA, Kramer DJ. The rectal trumpet: use of a nasopharyngeal airway to contain fecal incontinence in critically ill patients. JWOC Nurs 2002; 29: 193-201
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Keshava A, Renwick A, Stewart P et al. A nonsurgical means of fecal diversal: The Zassi Bowel Management System. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1017-1022
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Beitz JM. Ask the experts. Based on the literature and research, what is the best intervention for caring for the fecally incontinent patient? Are rectal Foley’s recommended?. Crit Care Nurse 1997; 17: 86-89
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Newman DK, Fader M, Bliss DZ et al. Managing incontinence using technology, devices and products. Nurs Res. 2004; 53 (Suppl. 06) S42-S48
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 National Institure for Health and Clincal Excellence (NICE). Clinical Guideline. Faecal incontinence: the management of faecal incontinence in adults. June 2007 www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG49NICEGuidance.pdf , letzter Zugriff: 01.02.2013
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Duso S. A new faecal containment device. Ostomy Wound Manage 1992; 38 (5) 38-41
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Ousey K, Gillibrand W. Using feacal collectors to reduce wound contamination. Wounds UK 2010; 6 (1) 86-91
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Palmieri B, Palmieri G, Bellini N. The anal bag; a modern approach to faecal incontinence management. Ostomy Wound Manage 2005; 51 (12) 44-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bosley CL. Applying perianal pouches with confidence. Nursing 1995; 25: 58-62
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Freedman P. The rectal pouch: a safer alternative to rectal tubes. Am J Nurs 1991; 91: 105-106
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Nelson JA, Daniels AU, Dodds WJ. Rectal balloons: complications, causes and recommendations. Invest Radiol 1979; 14: 48-59
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Bosley CL. Three methods of stool management for patients with diarrhea. Ostomy Wound Manage 1994; 40 (1) 52-57
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Kim J, Shim MC, Choi BY et al. Clinical application of continent anal plug in bedridden patients with intractable diarrhea. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1162-1167
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Beitz JM. Fecal incontinence in actuely and critically ill Patients: Options in Management. Ostomy Wound Manage 2006; 52 (12) 56-66
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Echols J, Friedman BC, Mullins RF et al. Clinical utility and economic impact of introducing a bowel management system. JWOC Nurs 2007; 34 (6) 664-670
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Johnston A. Evaluating Flexi-seal FMS: a faecal management system. Wounds UK 2005; 1 (3) 110-114
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Rothaug O, Kaltwasser A, Dubb R et al. Kontinuierliches Stuhldrainagesystem im intensivtherapeutischen Bereich. Intensivmed 2010; 47: 452-462
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Pittman J, Beeson T, Terry C et al. Methods of bowel management in critical care: a randomized controlled trial. JWOC Nurs. 2012; 39 (6) 633-639
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Bordes J, Goutorbe P, Asencio Y et al. A non-surgical device for faecal diversion in the management of perineal burns. Burns 2008; 34 (6) 840-844
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Benoit Jr RA, Watts C. The effect of a pressure ulcer prevention program and the bowel management system in reducing pressure ulcer prevalence in an ICU setting. JWOC Nurs 2007; 34 (2) 163-175
    Google Scholar
  • 43 MarínVivó G, Calixto Rodríguez J, Rodríguez Martínez X. Fecal control system Flexi-Seal FMS. Rev Enferm 2008; 31: 16-20
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Ousey K, Gillibrand W, Lui S et al. Effective management of acute faecal incontinence in hospital: review of continence management systems. Frontline Gastroenterology 2010; 1: 94-97
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Dubb R, Kaltwasser A, Müller-Wolff T et al. Stuhldrainage: Welches System eignet sich wann?. PflegenIntensiv 2012; 1: 20-25
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Langill M, Yan S, Kommala D et al. A Budget Impact Analysis Comparing Use of a Modern Fecal Management System to Traditional Fecal Management Methods in two Canadian Hospitals. Ostomy Wound Manage 2012; 58 (12) 25-33
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Müller-Wolff T, Hermes C, Rothaug O et al. Behandlungsstandardisierung in der Intensivpflege – am Beispiel eines Algorithmus zur kontinuierlichen Stuhldrainage. Intensiv-News 2013; 2: 34-36
    Google Scholar