Distally Based Perforator-Plus Sural Fasciocutaneous Flap for Soft-Tissue Reconstruction of the Distal Lower Leg, Ankle, and Foot: Comparison between Pediatric and Adult Patients

Abstract

There are no large series comparing the distally based perforator-plus sural fasciocutaneous flap used in pediatric and adult populations. The flaps were divided into two groups: the children (patient's age < 14 years) group (n = 53) and the adults (patient's age ≥ 18 years) group (n = 148). We compared flap-viability-related complications and their potential risk factors. In the patients with at least 12-month postoperative follow-up, the reconstruction outcomes, donor-site morbidities, and transitory and permanent swelling of the affected lower limb were compared. Partial necrosis, marginal necrosis, and overall complication rates were 13.2, 3.8, and 17.0% in the pediatric group, and 12.2, 1.4, and 13.6% in the adult group, respectively; the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Incidences of hypertrophic scar and pruritus at the donor site were significantly higher, while incidence of transitory swelling of the affected lower limb was significantly lower in the pediatric group. This flap in children is similar to that in adults in the reliability.

Keywords

surgical flaps - perforator - complications - sural flap - children

• References

• 1 Touam C, Rostoucher P, Bhatia A, Oberlin C. Comparative study of two series of distally based fasciocutaneous flaps for coverage of the lower one-fourth of the leg, the ankle, and the foot. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (2) 383-392
• 2 Lecours C, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C , et al. Freestyle pedicle perforator flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (5) 1589-1603
• 3 Lu TC, Lin CH, Lin CH, Lin YT, Chen RF, Wei FC. Versatility of the pedicled peroneal artery perforator flaps for soft-tissue coverage of the lower leg and foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (3) 386-393
• 4 Hallock GG. A paradigm shift in flap selection protocols for zones of the lower extremity using perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (4) 233-240
• 5 Rinker B, Valerio IL, Stewart DH, Pu LL, Vasconez HC. Microvascular free flap reconstruction in pediatric lower extremity trauma: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (6) 1618-1624
• 6 Upton J, Guo L. Pediatric free tissue transfer: a 29-year experience with 433 transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (5) 1725-1737
• 7 Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (6) 1115-1121
• 8 Bullocks JM, Hickey RM, Basu CB, Hollier LH, Kim JY. Single-stage reconstruction of Achilles tendon injuries and distal lower extremity soft tissue defects with the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (5) 566-572
• 9 Akhtar S, Hameed A. Versatility of the sural fasciocutaneous flap in the coverage of lower third leg and hind foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (8) 839-845
• 10 Follmar KE, Baccarani A, Baumeister SP, Levin LS, Erdmann D. The distally based sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (6) 138e-148e
• 11 Wong CH, Tan BK. Maximizing the reliability and safety of the distally based sural artery flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24 (8) 589-594
• 12 Wei JW, Ni JD, Dong ZG , et al. Distally based perforator-plus sural fasciocutaneous flap for reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects caused by motorcycle spoke injury in children. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73 (4) 1024-1027
• 13 Koladi J, Gang RK, Hamza AA, George A, Bang RL, Rajacic N. Versatility of the distally based superficial sural flap for reconstruction of lower leg and foot in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2003; 23 (2) 194-198
• 14 Vergara-Amador E. Distally-based superficial sural neurocutaneous flap for reconstruction of the ankle and foot in children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (8) 1087-1093
• 15 Liu L, Liu Y, Zou L, Li Z, Cao X, Cai J. The distally based superficial sural flap for reconstruction of the foot and ankle in pediatric patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (3) 199-204
• 16 Mehrotra S. Perforator-plus flaps: a new concept in traditional flap design. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (2) 590-598
• 17 Wei JW, Dong ZG, Ni JD , et al. Influence of flap factors on partial necrosis of reverse sural artery flap: a study of 179 consecutive flaps. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72 (3) 744-750
• 18 Boyden EM, Kitaoka HB, Cahalan TD, An KN. Late versus early repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Clinical and biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 317 (317) 150-158
• 19 Kao HK, Chang KP, Wei FC, Cheng MH. Comparison of the medial sural artery perforator flap with the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (4) 1125-1132
• 20 Parrett BM, Pribaz JJ, Matros E, Przylecki W, Sampson CE, Orgill DP. Risk analysis for the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap in distal leg reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (5) 1499-1504
• 21 Tajsiç N, Winkel R, Hoffmann R, Husum H. Sural perforator flap for reconstructive surgery in the lower leg and the foot: a clinical study of 86 patients with post-traumatic osteomyelitis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (12) 1701-1708
• 22 Baumeister SP, Spierer R, Erdmann D, Sweis R, Levin LS, Germann GK. A realistic complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps in a multimorbid patient group. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (1) 129-140 , discussion 141–142
• 23 Dai J, Chai Y, Wang C, Wen G, Liu S, Zhang W. Comparative study of two types of distally based sural neurocutaneous flap for reconstruction of lower leg, ankle, and heel. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (2) 125-130
• 24 Economides JM, Patel KM, Evans KK, Marshall E, Attinger CE. Systematic review of patient-centered outcomes following lower extremity flap reconstruction in comorbid patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (5) 307-316