Download PDF
Evid Based Spine Care J 2013; 04(02): 143-148
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357357
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Alternative Surgical Strategy for AxiaLIF Pseudarthrosis: A Series of Three Case Reports

Jan K. G. Louwerens
1   Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
,
Diederik Groot
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Woerden, The Netherlands
,
Dennis C. van Duijvenbode
1   Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
,
Maarten Spruit
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 March 2013

18 July 2013

Publication Date:
21 November 2013 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Study Design Retrospective case series.

Objective The objective of this study is to describe an alternative technique to attain interbody lumbar fusion in the event of pseudarthrosis after axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) and to assess its safety.

Methods Three patients who suffered from pseudarthrosis after AxiaLIF underwent revision surgery with a DEVEX cage (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, United States) through an anterior approach. We report technical details as well as clinical and radiological results at 12 months follow-up.

Results Preoperative symptoms resolved in all cases. There were no perioperative complications. One patient had a deep venous thrombosis at postoperative day 9. A decrease in visual analog scale score for pain was observed, from 8.67 preoperatively to 2 postoperatively at final follow-up. Radiographic workup after 12 months showed no sign of implant failure or loosening, and fusion was obtained in all cases.

Conclusion Anterior fusion with a DEVEX cage in front of a TranS1 screw (TranS1 screw, Inc., Wilmington, North Carolina, United States) for AxiaLIF pseudarthrosis is safe and effective.

Keywords

lumbar spine - interbody fusion - axial - presacral - pseudarthrosis - revision surgery - AxiaLIF
 

  • References

  • 1 Carl A, Ledet E, Oliveira C , et al. Percutaneous axial lumbar spine surgery. In: Perez-Cruet MJ, Khoo LT, Fessler RG, , eds. An Anatomic Approach to Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2006: 654-670
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Cragg A, Carl A, Casteneda F , et al. New percutaneous access method for minimally invasive anterior lumbosacral surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17: 21-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Marotta N, Cosar M, Pimenta L , et al. A novel minimally invasive presacral approach and instrumentation technique for anterior L5–S1 intervertebral discectomy and fusion: technical description and case presentations. Neurosurg Focus 2006; 20 (1) E9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP , et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18 (Suppl): S1-S6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Lindley EM, McCullough MA, Burger EL , et al. Complications of axial lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15 (3) 273-279
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Tobler WD, Gerszten PC, Bradley WD , et al. Minimally Invasive Axial Presacral L5–S1 Interbody Fusion: two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine 2011; 36: 1296-1301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA , et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002; 15: 337-349
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Freeman BJ, Licina P, Mehdian SH. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion: 5-year results in 60 patients. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 42-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 2001; 48 (3) 569-574
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tobler WD, Ferrara LA. The presacral retroperitoneal approach for axial lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study of clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates at a follow-up of two years in 26 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (7) 955-960
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hofstetter CP, James AR, Hartl R. Revision strategies for AxiaLIF. Neurosurg Focus 2011; 31 (4) E17
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 DeVine JG, Gloystein D, Singh N. A novel alternative for removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) in the setting of pseudarthrosis of L5–S1. Spine J 2009; 9 (11) 910-915
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Cohen A, Miller LE, Block JE. Minimally invasive presacral approach for revision of an Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion rod due to fall related lumbosacral instability: a case report. J Med Case Reports 2011; 5: 488
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Goldstein C, Drew B. When is a spine fused? Injury. Int. J. Care Injured 2011; 42: 306-313
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ledet E, Tymeson M, Salerno S , et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device. J Biomech Eng 2005; 127: 929-933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ , et al. Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5–S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008; 51 (4) 225-230
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

    • Commentary References

    • 1 DeVine JG, Gloystein D, Singh N. A novel alternative for removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) in the setting of pseudarthrosis of L5-S1. Spine J 2009; 9 (11) 910-915
      CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
    • 2 Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ, Acosta Jr FL, Coover C, Ames CP. Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008; 51 (4) 225-230
      Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar