Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357367
Success in Academic Spine Surgery: The Role of Mentoring
Publication History
13 June 2013
19 July 2013
Publication Date:
21 November 2013 (online)
Introduction
Since the 1980s, multiple sources have suggested that the number of clinician scientists in academic medicine has declined substantially.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] More recently, Corrice et al identified that 2.9 to 10% of American, full-time clinical MD faculty planned to leave academia and 13 to 27.8% were unsure of staying or leaving.[6] Although no data regarding the size or productivity of the academic spine surgeon workforce has ever been published, there is reason to believe that a similar phenomenon is occurring within our specialty. Furthermore, as the demand for spine surgery continues to grow[7] [8] [9] [10] in the face of intensifying competition for health-care resources, the call for high-quality studies to guide spine surgeons, payers, and policy-makers is stronger than ever. With the resulting scenario, in which fewer academic spine surgeons are being asked to produce more evidence upon which decision making in spine surgery can be based, the need for recruitment and retention of academic spine surgeons has never been greater.
A career in academic medicine provides young spine surgeons with the opportunity to practice in an environment where they can educate the next generation of surgeons, contribute meaningfully to the spine literature and provide outstanding clinical care. Unfortunately, multiple barriers to the pursuit of an academic surgical career exist.[11] In particular, a lack of motivated and experienced mentors has been consistently identified as a barrier to successful completion of research and a reason for not choosing a career in academic medicine.[5] [12] [13] [14] Because early and sustained mentorship significantly predicts future dedication of time to research efforts,[15] it is imperative that practicing spine surgeons understand the role of mentoring in the development of future spine clinician scientists.
The purpose of this article is to review the definition of a mentor as well as to outline the specific functions of a mentor in the context of establishment of career in academic medicine. The essential characteristics of outstanding mentors will then be discussed, as will the qualities and actions of successful mentees. Finally, the proposed benefits of participating in a mentoring relationship for both the senior and junior academic spine surgeon will be outlined.
-
References
- 1 Brunette MG, Monast MA. The vanishing clinician—scientist. Can Med Assoc J 1982; 127 (8) 675-676
- 2 Hurwitz SR, Buckwalter JA. The orthopaedic surgeon scientist: an endangered species?. J Orthop Res 1999; 17 (2) 155-156
- 3 Rosenberg L. Physician-scientists—endangered and essential. Science 1999; 283 (5400) 331-332
- 4 Badaró R, Jones TC. Preventive health care for an endangered species—the physician scientist. Braz J Infect Dis 2001; 5 (2) 101-103
- 5 Brand RA, Hannafin JA. The environment of the successful clinician-scientist. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449: 67-71
- 6 Corrice AM, Fox S, Bunton SA. Retention of full-time clinical MD faculty at US medical schools. Analysis in Brief 2011; 11 (2) 1-2
- 7 Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 443: 139-146
- 8 Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W , et al. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31 (17) 1957-1963 , discussion 1964
- 9 Wang MC, Kreuter W, Wolfla CE, Maiman DJ, Deyo RA. Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: Medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (9) 955-961 , discussion 962–963
- 10 Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (14) 1226-1232
- 11 Kubiak NT, Guidot DM, Trimm RF, Kamen DL, Roman J. Recruitment and retention in academic medicine—what junior faculty and trainees want department chairs to know. Am J Med Sci 2012; 344 (1) 24-27
- 12 Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296 (9) 1103-1115
- 13 Cohen JG, Sherman AE, Kiet TK , et al. Characteristics of success in mentoring and research productivity - a case-control study of academic centers. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125 (1) 8-13
- 14 Entezami P, Franzblau LE, Chung KC. Mentorship in surgical training: a systematic review. Hand (NY) 2012; 7 (1) 30-36
- 15 Steiner JF, Curtis P, Lanphear BP, Vu KO, Main DS. Assessing the role of influential mentors in the research development of primary care fellows. Acad Med 2004; 79 (9) 865-872
- 16 Gough I. Mentoring: historical origins and contemporary value. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78 (10) 831
- 17 Healy CC, Welchert AJ. Mentoring relations: a definition to advance research and practice. Educ Res 1990; 19 (9) 17-21
- 18 Jochemsen-van der Leeuw HG, van Dijk N, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Wieringa-de Waard M. The attributes of the clinical trainer as a role model: a systematic review. Acad Med 2013; 88 (1) 26-34
- 19 Kram KE. Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Glenview, IL: Pearson Scott Foresman; 1985: 1-268
- 20 Straus SE, Johnson MO, Marquez C, Feldman MD. Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers. Acad Med 2013; 88 (1) 82-89
- 21 Cho CS, Ramanan RA, Feldman MD. Defining the ideal qualities of mentorship: a qualitative analysis of the characteristics of outstanding mentors. Am J Med 2011; 124 (5) 453-458
- 22 Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25 (1) 72-78
- 23 Zerzan JT, Hess R, Schur E, Phillips RS, Rigotti N. Making the most of mentors: a guide for mentees. Acad Med 2009; 84 (1) 140-144
- 24 Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. The impact of mentoring during postgraduate training on doctors' career success. Med Educ 2011; 45 (5) 488-496
- 25 Morzinski JA, Diehr S, Bower DJ, Simpson DE. A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty. Fam Med 1996; 28 (6) 434-438
- 26 Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC , et al. Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 1998; 73 (3) 318-323
- 27 Tracy EE, Jagsi R, Starr R, Tarbell NJ. Outcomes of a pilot faculty mentoring program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (6) 1846-1850
- 28 Wingard DL, Garman KA, Reznik V. Facilitating faculty success: outcomes and cost benefit of the UCSD National Center of Leadership in Academic Medicine. Acad Med 2004; 79 (10, Suppl): S9-S11
- 29 Zeind CS, Zdanowicz M, MacDonald K, Parkhurst C, King C, Wizwer P. Developing a sustainable faculty mentoring program. Am J Pharm Educ 2005; 69 (5) 1-13
- 30 Thorndyke LE, Gusic ME, George JH, Quillen DA, Milner RJ. Empowering junior faculty: Penn State's faculty development and mentoring program. Acad Med 2006; 81 (7) 668-673
- 31 Feldman MD, Arean PA, Marshall SJ, Lovett M, O'Sullivan PO. Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Med Educ Online 2010; ; doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063
- 32 Ramanan RA, Taylor WC, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Mentoring matters. Mentoring and career preparation in internal medicine residency training. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (4) 340-345
- 33 Chew LD, Watanabe JM, Buchwald D, Lessler DS. Junior faculty's perspectives on mentoring. Acad Med 2003; 78 (6) 652
- 34 Rabatin JS, Lipkin Jr M, Rubin AS, Schachter A, Nathan M, Kalet A. A year of mentoring in academic medicine: case report and qualitative analysis of fifteen hours of meetings between a junior and senior faculty member. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19 (5, Pt 2) 569-573
- 35 Barker ER. Mentoring—a complex relationship. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2006; 18 (2) 56-61
- 36 Steiner JF, Lanphear BP, Curtis P, Vu KO. Indicators of early research productivity among primary care fellows. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17 (11) 845-851
- 37 Wise MR, Shapiro H, Bodley J , et al. Factors affecting academic promotion in obstetrics and gynaecology in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004; 26 (2) 127-136
- 38 Beasley BW, Simon SD, Wright SM. The Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia (Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia). A time to be promoted. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (2) 123-129
- 39 Kosoko-Lasaki O, Sonnino RE, Voytko ML. Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: experience at two institutions of higher education. J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98 (9) 1449-1459
- 40 Emans SJ, Goldberg CT, Milstein ME, Dobriner J. Creating a faculty development office in an academic pediatric hospital: challenges and successes. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (2) 390-401
- 41 Assael LA. Every surgeon needs mentors: a Halsteadian/Socratic model in the modern age. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (6) 1217-1218