Indikationen zur dreidimensionalen Röntgendiagnostik in der oralen Implantologie

• Literatur

• 1 Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-1564
• 2 Heurich T, Ziegler C, Steveling H et al. [Digital volume tomography–an extension to the diagnostic procedures available for application before surgical removal of third molars]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2002; 6: 427-432
• 3 Bremke M, Leppek R, Werner JA. Die DVT in der HNO-Heilkunde. wissenkompakt 2011; 2: 39-46
• 4 Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K et al. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 114-119
• 5 Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F et al. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 507-515
• 6 Bornstein MM, Wölner-Hanssen AB, Sendi P et al. Comparison of intraoral radiography and limited cone beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-fractured permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 571-577
• 7 Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L et al. Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: “low-dose cone-beam” CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003; 29: 773-775
• 8 Low KMT, Dula K, Bürgin W et al. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 2008; 34: 557-562
• 9 Bornstein MM, Wasmer J, Sendi P et al. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane and apical bone in maxillary molars referred for apical surgery: a comparative radiographic analysis using limited cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2012; 38: 51-57
• 10 Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1261-1266
• 11 Kasaj A, Willershausen B. Digital volume tomography for diagnostics in periodontology. Int J Comput Dent 2007; 10: 155-168
• 12 Walter C, Kaner D, Berndt DC et al. 3D imaging as a preoperative tool in decision making for furcation surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 250-257
• 13 Guerrero M. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clinical Oral Investig 2006; 1: 1-7
• 14 Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U et al. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 125-131
• 15 SEDENTEXCT project. Radiation Protection: Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Evidence Based Guidelines (v2.0 Final). 2011 Im Internet: http://www.sedentexct.eu Stand: 04.05.2014
• 16 Farman AG. ALARA still applies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 395-397
• 17 Horner K, Rushton V, Tsiklakis K et al. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology; the safe use of radiographs in dental practice. European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport: Radiation Protection. 2004
• 18 Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 6: 106-114
• 19 Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-271
• 20 Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 461-468
• 21 Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y et al. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-378
• 22 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie (DGMKG). Konsensuspapier: Indikationen zur Schnittbilddiagnostik in der Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie (CT/DVT). MKG-Chirurg 2008; 1: 148-151
• 23 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zahn-, Mund-, Kieferheilkunde (DGZMK). Leitlinie: Dentale Volumentomografie. 2009 Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/083-005_S1_Dentale_Volumentomografie_04-2009_12-2012.pdf Stand: 04.05.2014
• 24 Bundesverband der implantologisch tätigen Zahnärzte in Europa/European Association of Dental Implantologists (BDIZ EDI). Leitfaden Dreidimensionale Bildgebung in der Implantologie. 2009 Im Internet: http://www.bdiz.de/service/oav10/Grafik/jh09042927-1.pdf Stand: 04.05.2014
• 25 Konsensusgestützte Leitlinie (S2 k) der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) Indikationen zur implantologischen 3D-Röntgendiagnostik und navigationsgestützte Implantologie, Registernummer 083-011. 2011 Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/083-011.html Stand: 04.05.2014
• 26 Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery – a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 305-313
• 27 Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S et al. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 651-656
• 28 Meyer U, Wiesmann HP, Runte C et al. Evaluation of accuracy of insertion of dental implants and prosthetic treatment by computer-aided navigation in minipigs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41: 102-108
• 29 Zheng G, Gu L, Wu Z et al. The implementation of an integrated computer-aided system for dental implantology. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008: 58-61
• 30 Kramer FJ, Baethge C, Swennen G et al. Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 60-68
• 31 Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H. Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 271-275
• 32 Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1156-1162
• 33 Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M et al. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template- based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (Suppl. 04) 73-86
• 34 Widmann G, Stoffner R, Bale R. Errors and error management in image-guided craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 701-715
• 35 Voitik AJ. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I. J Oral Implantol 2002; 28: 302-303
• 36 Patel N. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141 (Suppl. 02) 20S-24S
• 37 Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M et al. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placementusing an image-guided system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 298-304
• 38 Nkenke E, Eitner S, Radespiel-Troger M et al. Patient-centred outcomes comparing transmucosal implant placement with an open approach in the maxilla: a prospective, non-randomized pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 197-203
• 39 Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G et al. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 609-614
• 40 Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 571-577
• 41 Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Schlegel KA et al. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels during healing period, adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder implants inserted in the posterior zone of the jaws, placed with flapless surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1386-1393
• 42 Schulze RK, Berndt D, dʼHoedt B. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 100-107
• 43 Fleiner J, Weyer N, Stricker A. Dentale Volumentomografie – DVT-Diagnostik. Biberach: Agentur 2einhalb; 2013
• 44 Aparicio C, Rangert B, Sennerby L. Immediate/early loading of dental implants: a report from the Sociedad Española de Implantes World Congress consensus meeting in Barcelona, Spain, 2002. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 57-60
• 45 Toffler M. Treating the atrophic posterior maxilla by combining short implants with minimally invasive osteotome procedures. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2006; 18: 301-308
• 46 ten Bruggenkate CM, van den Bergh JPA. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: a valuable pre-prosthetic procedure. Periodontology 2000 1998; 17: 176-182
• 47 Tiwana PS, Kushner GM, Haug RH. Maxillary sinus augmentation. Dent Clin North Am 2006; 50: 409-424
• 48 Temmerman A, Hertelé S, Teughels W et al. Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 189-194
• 49 Paris M, Chaux-Bodard AG, Gourmet R et al. Guided implant surgery on oral cancer patients: in vitro study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011; 6: 135-142
• 50 Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A et al. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: a radiographic study using cone beam computed tomoraphy (CBCT). Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;
• 51 Oberli K, Bornstein MM, von Arx T. Periapical surgery and the maxillary sinus: radiographic parameters for clinical outcome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2007; 103: 848-853
• 52 Janner SF, Jeger FB, Lussi A et al. Precision of endodontic working length measurements: a pilot investigation comparing cone beam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod 2011; 37: 1046-1051
• 53 Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa: incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997; 25: 261-265
• 54 Velásquez-Plata D, Lutonsky J, Jones R. A close-up look at an implant fracture: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 483-491
• 55 Koymen R, Karacayli U, Gocmen-Mas N et al. Flap and incision design in implant surgery: clinical and anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 2009; 31: 301-306
• 56 Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM et al. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35: 417-422
• 57 Ulm CW, Solar P, Krennmair G et al. Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinus-lift procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 462-465
• 58 van der Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ et al. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Imp Res 2000; 11: 256-265
• 59 Bornstein MM, von Arx T, Altermatt HJ. Loss of pulp sensitivity and pain as the first symptoms of an Ewingʼs sarcoma in the right maxillary sinus and alveolar process: Report of a case. J Endod 2008; 34: 1549-1553
• 60 Pikos MA. Maxillary sinus membrane repair: Report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent 1999; 8: 29-34
• 61 Cagici CA, Yilmazer C, Hurcan C et al. Appropriate interslice gap for screening coronal paranasal sinus tomography for mucosal thickening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 266: 519-525
• 62 ITI Consensus Conference. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; (Suppl. 29)
• 63 Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994; 15: 152-162
• 64 Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 613-616
• 65 Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent 2010; 38: 612-620