Download PDF
Zahnmedizin up2date 2015; 9(06): 537-560
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358207
Kieferorthopädie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Digitale Kieferorthopädie

Karl-Friedrich Krey
,
Frank Orlob
,
Susanne Gorynia
,
Rolf Kühnert
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 December 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

In der gesamten Zahnmedizin sind in den letzten Jahren Veränderungen durch die immer stärkere Durchdringung digitaler Verfahren zu spüren. Neben etablierten Methoden wie der CAD/CAM-gestützten Herstellung (CAD: Computer Aided Design; CAM: Computer Aided Manufacturing) von Zahnersatz in Form von Kronen und Brücken, Chairside oder im Labor, oder der instrumentellen Funktionsanalyse rückt nun die Verbindung dieser Elemente im Sinne einer „Smart Dentistry“ in den Vordergrund. Mit den neuen Verfahren halten auch neue Materialien Einzug in die Praxis. Ebenso wird das Berufsbild des Zahntechnikers in absehbarer Zukunft einem dramatischen Wandel unterliegen.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Harradine N, Suominen R, Stephens C et al. Holograms as substitutes for orthodontic study casts: a pilot clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 98: 110-116
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Salmi M. Medical applications of additive manufacturing in surgery and dental care [Doctoral Thesis]. Finnland: Aalto University, Department of Engineering Desing and Production; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Kwon SY, Kim Y, Ahn HW et al. Computer-aided designing and manufacturing of lingual fixed orthodontic appliances using 2D/3D registration software and rapid prototyping. Int J Dent 2014; 2014: 164164
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2011; 140: 433-443
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dewhorst R. Assessment of computer customized brackets and positioning jigs. Int J Orthod 2012; 23: 53-58
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Buschang PH, Ross M, Shaw SG et al. Predicted and actual end-of-treatment occlusion produced with aligner therapy. Angle Orthod 2015; 85 (5) 723-727
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM et al. Linear measurements using virtual study models. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 1098-1106
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ghislanzoni LTH, Lineberger M, Cevidanes LHS et al. Evaluation of tip and torque on virtual study models: a validation study. Progress Orthod 2013; 14: 19
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Wriedt S, Schmidtmann I, Niemann M et al. Digital 3D image of bimaxillary casts connected by a vestibular scan. J Orofac Orthop 2013; 74: 309-318
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cuperus AMR, Harms MC, Rangel FA et al. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: A validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012; 142: 308-313
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kattadiyil MT, Mursic Z, Al Rumaih H et al. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication. J Prosth Dent 2014; 112: 444-448
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grünheid T, McCarty SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2014; 146: 673-682
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC et al. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Kor J Orthod 2014; 44: 69-76
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S et al. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing – generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 1133-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Nolthenius HET et al. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2013; 143: 140-147
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hirschfelder U. Stellungnahme der DGKFO zur Radiologischen 3D-Diagnostik in der Kieferorthopädie (CT/DVT). DGKFO; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Toma AM, Zhurow A, Payle E et al. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009; 12: 33-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A et al. Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 124: 593-599
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kühnert R. Virtuelle Behandlungsplanung in der KFO-Therapie. COO 2013; 3–4: 52-64
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Im J, Cha JY, Lee KJ et al. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2014; 145: 434-442
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Martorelli M, Gerbuno S, Giudice M et al. A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mat 2013; 20: e1-e10
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Hurt AJ. Digital technology in the orthodontic laboratory. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012; 141: 245-247
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Conner BP, Manogharan GP, Martof AN et al. Making sense of 3D printing: Creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services. Add Manufact 2014; 1: 64-76
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Groth C, Kravitz ND, Jones PE et al. Three-dimensional printing technology. J Clin Orthod 2014; 163: 475-485
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Adolphs N, Liu W, Keeve E et al. RapidSplint: virtual splint generation for orthognathic surgery – results of a pilot series. Comput Aided Surg 2014; 19: 20-28
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kaduk WMH, Podmelle F, Louis PJ. Surgical navigation in reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 2013; 25: 313-333
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ahamed SF, Kanna ASA. A 3D-printed miniscrew insertion stent. JCO 2014; 163: 650-652
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Salmi M, Tuomi J, Sirkkanen R et al. Rapid tooling method for soft customized removable oral appliances. Open Dent J 2012; 6: 85-89
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mortadi NA, Eggbeer D, Lewis J et al. CAD/CAM/AM applications in the manufacture of dental appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012; 142: 727-733
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wolf M, Schumacher P, Jäger F et al. Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology. J Orofac Orthop 2015; 76: 164-174
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yu Q, Xin G, Guo-Min W et al. A novel technique for presurgical nasoalveolar molding using computer-aided reverse engineering and rapid prototyping. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22: 142-146
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 van Noordt G. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 3-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Patzelt SBM, Lamprinos C, Stampf S et al. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners. An in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 542-551
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Liu YF, Zhang PY, Zhang QF et al. Digital design and fabrication of simulation model for measuring orthodontic force. Bio Med Mat Engin 2014; 24: 2265-2271
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Wu K, Chen L, Zhou Y. Tooth segmentation on dental meshes using morphologic skeleton. Com & Graphics 2014; 38: 199-211
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Plooij JM, Maal TJJ, Haers P et al. Digital three-dimensional image fusion process for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. In J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40: 341-352
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Shqaidef A, Ayoub AF, Khambay BS. How accurate are rapid prototyped (RP) final orthodontic surgical wafers? A pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 52: 609-614
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Soares PV, de Almeida Milito G, Pereira FA et al. Rapid prototyping and 3D-virtual models for operative dentistry education in Brazil. J Dent Edu 2013; 77: 358-363
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Vassura G, Vassura M, Bazzacchi A et al. A shift of the force vector from arm to brain: 3D computer technology in orthodontic treatment. Int Orthod 2010; 8: 46-63
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mat 2009; 28: 44-56
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar