RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1359719
Reconsidering the Switch from Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin to Unfractionated Heparin during Pregnancy
Publikationsverlauf
15. August 2013
18. September 2013
Publikationsdatum:
11. Dezember 2013 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ajp/201408/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0033-1359719-1.jpg)
Abstract
Venous thromboembolic disease accounts for 9% of all maternal deaths in the United States. In patients at risk for thrombosis, common practice is to start prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin and transition to unfractionated heparin during the third trimester, with the perception that administration of neuraxial anesthesia will be safer while on unfractionated heparin, as spinal/epidural hematomas have been associated with recent use of low-molecular-weight heparin. In patients receiving prophylactic doses of unfractionated heparin, neuraxial anesthesia may be placed, provided the dose used is 5,000 units twice a day. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine guidelines recognize that the safety of neuraxial anesthesia in patients receiving more than 10,000 units per day or more than 2 doses per day is unknown, limiting the theoretical benefit of unfractionated heparin at doses higher than 5,000 units twice a day.
-
References
- 1 Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (1) e1-e5 ; discussion 91–92, e7–e11
- 2 Bates SM, Greer IA, Middeldorp S, Veenstra DL, Prabulos AM, Vandvik PO ; American College of Chest Physicians. VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (2, Suppl): e691S-e736S
- 3 Lockwood C, Wendel G ; Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 124: inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (3) 730-740
- 4 Hynson JM, Katz JA, Bueff HU. Epidural hematoma associated with enoxaparin. Anesth Analg 1996; 82 (5) 1072-1075
- 5 James A ; Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 123: thromboembolism in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (3) 718-729
- 6 Lumpkin MM. FDA public health advisory: low molecular-weight heparin and spinal/epidural anesthesia or spinal puncture. Int J Trauma Nurs 1998; 4 (2) 56-57
- 7 Garcia DA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI, Samama MM ; American College of Chest Physicians. Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: e24S-e43S
- 8 Hirsh J, van Aken WG, Gallus AS, Dollery CT, Cade JF, Yung WL. Heparin kinetics in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1976; 53 (4) 691-695
- 9 Dawes J, Papper DS. Catabolism of low-dose heparin in man. Thromb Res 1979; 14 (6) 845-860
- 10 Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Spencer FA , et al. Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: e326S-e350S
- 11 Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC , et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010; 35 (1) 64-101
- 12 Nutescu EA, Spinler SA, Wittkowsky A, Dager WE. Low-molecular-weight heparins in renal impairment and obesity: available evidence and clinical practice recommendations across medical and surgical settings. Ann Pharmacother 2009; 43 (6) 1064-1083
- 13 Firozvi K, Deveras RA, Kessler CM. Reversal of low-molecular-weight heparin-induced bleeding in patients with pre-existing hypercoagulable states with human recombinant activated factor VII concentrate. Am J Hematol 2006; 81 (8) 582-589