Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014; 74(3): 284-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1360329
Case Report
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Cervical Carcinoma in Early Pregnancy – Successful Birth by Caesarean Section Followed by Radical Hysterectomy

Zervixkarzinom in der Frühschwangerschaft – Erfolgreiche Geburt per Sectio mit anschließender radikaler Hysterektomie
K. Schreiber
Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
,
S. Rothe
Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
,
M. Untch
Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 06 November 2013
revised 03 January 2014

accepted 09 January 2014

Publication Date:
09 April 2014 (online)

Abstract

A cervical carcinoma was diagnosed in a 32-year-old patient in the 17th week of her pregnancy. The histological confirmation revealed a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. It was a clinical stage Ib1 tumour, without enlarged lymph nodes according to the image. After a staging MRI, intensive education of the patient and case discussion at the interdisciplinary tumour board as well as consultation with the neonatologist, it was agreed to prolong the pregnancy under close monitoring. The carcinoma was confined to the cervix in the further course of the pregnancy. The elective delivery was planned after 32 weeks of gestation. The primary Caesarean section followed by radical hysterectomy Piver II were carried out without complications. After regular postoperative progression of the mother, brachytherapy was performed at the appropriate time. The premature newborn was under neonatal care and exhibited good postnatal adaptation. Mother and child were discharged in good health.

Zusammenfassung

Bei einer 32-jährigen Patientin wurde in der 17. Schwangerschaftswoche ein Zervixkarzinom diagnostiziert. Die histologische Sicherung ergab ein gut differenziertes Plattenepithelkarzinom. Es handelt sich um ein klinisches Tumorstadium Ib1, bildgebend ohne vergrößerte Lymphknoten. Nach Staging-MRT, intensiver Aufklärung der Patientin und Falldiskussion im interdisziplinären Tumorboard sowie Absprache mit den Neonatologen wurde die Prolongation der Schwangerschaft unter engmaschiger Kontrolle vereinbart. Das Karzinom blieb im weiteren Schwangerschaftsverlauf auf die Zervix beschränkt. Die elektive Entbindung wurde nach 32 SSW geplant. Die primäre Sectio caesarea mit anschließender radikaler Hysterektomie nach Piver II verlief ohne Komplikationen. Bei regelrechtem postoperativem Verlauf der Mutter wurde zeitgerecht die Brachytherapie durchgeführt. Das prämature Neugeborene wurde bei guter postnataler Adaptation neonatologisch betreut. Mutter und Kind konnten gesund nach Hause entlassen werden.

 
  • References

  • 1 Sadler L, Sykes P. How little is known about cervical cancer in pregnancy?. Ann Oncol 2005; 16: 341-343
  • 2 Partridge EE, Abu-Rustum N, Campos S et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008; 6: 58-82
  • 3 Weisz B, Schiff E, Lishner M. Cancer in pregnancy: maternal and fetal implications. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 384-393
  • 4 Jones WB, Shingleton HM, Russell A et al. Cervical carcinoma and pregnancy. A national patterns of care study of the American College of Surgeons. Cancer 1996; 77: 1479-1488
  • 5 Amant F, Van Calsteren K, Halaska MJ et al. Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines of an international consensus meeting. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19 (Suppl. 01) S1-S12
  • 6 Strauss A, Strauss C, Hilpert F et al. Gynäkologische Krebserkrankungen während der Schwangerschaft. Gynäkologe 2011; 44: 725-734
  • 7 Strauss A. Guter Hoffnung und vom Tode bedroht – krebskrank und schwanger. Speculum 2010; 28: 8-19
  • 8 Sood AK, Sorosky JI. Invasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy. How to manage the dilemma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 343-352
  • 9 Lee JM, Lee KB, Kim YT et al. Cervical cancer associated with pregnancy: results of a multicenter retrospective Korean study (KGOG-1006). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 92.e1-92.e6
  • 10 Amant F, Brepoels L, Halaska MJ et al. Gynaecologic cancer complicating pregnancy: an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 61-79
  • 11 Zemlickis D, Lishner M, Degendorfer P et al. Maternal and fetal outcome after invasive cervical cancer in pregnancy. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1956-1961
  • 12 Goncalves CV et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer during pregnancy. Sao Paulo Med J 2009; 127: 359-365
  • 13 Benhaim Y, Pautier P, Bensaid C et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage cervical cancer in a pregnant patient: report of one case with rapid tumor progression. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 267-268
  • 14 Morice P et al. French recommendations on the management of invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 1638-1641
  • 15 Hoellen F, Dietrich K, Beyer DA et al. Zervixkarzinom in der Schwangerschaft. Der Gynäkologe 2012; 12: 939-944
  • 16 Caluwaerts S, van Calsteren K, Mertens L et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: report of a case and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16: 905-908
  • 17 Bader AA, Petru E, Winter R. Long-term follow-up after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk cervical cancer during pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 269-272
  • 18 Karam A, Feldman N, Holschneider CH. Neoadjuvant cisplatin and radical cesarean hysterectomy for cervical cancer in pregnancy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007; 4: 375-380
  • 19 Watanabe Y, Tsuritani M, Kataoka T et al. Radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of a single institution experience. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2009; 30: 79-81
  • 20 Van Calsteren K et al. Cancer during pregnancy: an analysis of 215 patients emphasizing the obstetrical and the neonatal outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 683-689
  • 21 Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF et al. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 164-175