Semin Thromb Hemost 2014; 40(01): 099-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363473
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Antithrombotic Treatment of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: Results of an International Registry

Walter Ageno
1   Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
Nicoletta Riva
1   Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
Sam Schulman
2   Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Soo Mee Bang
3   Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
,
Maria Teresa Sartori
4   Clinical Medicine II, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
,
Elvira Grandone
5   IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, S. Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
,
Jan Beyer-Westendorf
6   Division of Angiology, Center for Vascular Medicine and Department of Medicine III, University Hospital “Carl Gustav Carus”, Dresden, Germany
,
Giovanni Barillari
7   Center for Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases, University Hospital, Udine, Italy
,
Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno
8   Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
,
Francesco Dentali
1   Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
on behalf of the IRSVT study group › Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2013 (online)

Zoom Image

Abstract

Treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a clinical challenge due to heterogeneity of clinical presentations, increased bleeding risk, and lack of evidences from clinical trials. We performed an international registry to describe current treatment strategies and factors associated with therapeutic decisions in a large prospective cohort of unselected SVT patients. A total of 613 patients were enrolled (mean age 53.1 years, standard deviation ± 14.8); 62.6% males; the majority (468 patients) had portal vein thrombosis. Most common risk factors included cirrhosis (27.8%), solid cancer (22.3%), and intra-abdominal inflammation/infection (11.7%); in 27.4% of patients, SVT was idiopathic. During the acute phase, 470 (76.7%) patients received anticoagulant drugs, 136 patients (22.2%) remained untreated. Incidental diagnosis, single vein thrombosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, cancer, and cirrhosis were significantly associated with no anticoagulant treatment. Decision to start patients on vitamin K antagonists after an initial course of parenteral anticoagulation was significantly associated with younger age, symptomatic onset, multiple veins involvement, and unprovoked thrombosis. Although a nonnegligible proportion of SVT patients did not receive anticoagulant treatment, the majority received the same therapies recommended for patients with usual sites thrombosis, with some differences driven by the site of thrombosis and the pathogenesis of the disease.

Crossref Cited-by logo
Zitierungen