Endoscopic characterization of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with and without dysplasia

Background and study aims: Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) are precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC), but their endoscopic detection can be difficult. We therefore examined the endoscopic characteristics of SSA/Ps with and without dysplasia in a cross-sectional study.

Patients and methods: We reviewed clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic data from patients undergoing colonoscopy between February 2008 and February 2012. We categorized colorectal polyps according to anatomic site, size, and shape, and classified serrated polyps using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Multiple logistic regression analyses examined potential differences regarding site, size, and shape between SSA/Ps and colorectal adenomas (overall and advanced only).

Results: We examined 7433 patients (mean age 59 years, 45.9 % men) with 5968 colorectal polyps. In total, we found 170 SSA/Ps (170/5968, 2.9 %), including 63 SSA/Ps with dysplasia (1.1 %) and 107 SSA/Ps without dysplasia (1.8 %). Compared with SSA/Ps with dysplasia, SSA/Ps without dysplasia were more often proximally located (odds ratio [OR] 3.3, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.7 – 6.4), but less often < 6 mm in size (OR 0.6, 95 %CI 0.3 – 1.1). No significant differences were found regarding location between SSA/Ps with dysplasia and advanced adenomas (proximal colon, 47.6 % vs. 40.1 %). However, SSA/Ps with dysplasia were more often < 6 mm in size than advanced adenomas (OR 0.3, 95 %CI 0.2 – 0.5). Of the 63 dysplastic SSA/Ps, 6 (9.5 %) contained high grade dysplasia, but none invasive carcinoma.

Conclusions: SSA/Ps with dysplasia are frequently < 6 mm in size, located throughout the colon and 9.5 % of them contain high grade dysplasia. These findings underscore the importance of high quality colonoscopic examination to maximize protection against CRC.

• References

• 1 Jacob BJ, Moineddin R, Sutradhar R et al. Effect of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an instrumental variable analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 355-364
• 2 Sanduleanu S, Masclee AM, Meijer GA. Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 9: 550-554
• 3 le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ et al. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut 2013; Epub 6 June 2013
• 4 Arain MA, Sawhney M, Sheikh S et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1189-1195
• 5 Yang S, Farraye FA, Mack C et al. BRAF and KRAS Mutations in hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas of the colorectum: relationship to histology and CpG island methylation status. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28: 1452-1459
• 6 Ensari A, Bilezikci B, Carneiro F et al. Serrated polyps of the colon: how reproducible is their classification?. Virchows Arch 2012; 461: 495-504
• 7 Snover DC, Ahnen DJ, Burt RW, Odze RD. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise N, eds. WHO classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics. Tumours of the digestive system. 4th edn Lyon: IARC; 2010: 160-165
• 8 Gurudu SR, Heigh RI, De Petris G et al. Sessile serrated adenomas: demographic, endoscopic and pathological characteristics. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3402-3405
• 9 Buda A, De Bona M, Dotti I et al. Prevalence of different subtypes of serrated polyps and risk of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk population undergoing first-time colonoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2012; 3 e6. Epub 2012 January 5
• 10 Tadepalli US, Feihel D, Miller KM et al. A morphologic analysis of sessile serrated polyps observed during routine colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1360-1368
• 11 Hazewinkel Y, Lopez-Ceron M, East JE et al. Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas: validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 916-924
• 12 Oono Y, Fu K, Nakamura H et al. Progression of a sessile serrated adenoma to an early invasive cancer within 8 months. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 906-909
• 13 Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1315-1329
• 14 Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857
• 15 Sanduleanu S, Rondagh EJ, Masclee AA. Development of expertise in the detection and classification of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasia: Experience-based data at an academic GI unit. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010; 20: 449-460
• 16 Rondagh EJ, Bouwens MW, Riedl RG et al. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1218-1225
• 17 Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990; 65: 63-67
• 18 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803
• 19 Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. Jama 2008; 299: 1027-1035
• 20 Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Slezak P et al. Flat neoplastic lesions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 114-122
• 21 Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000; 355: 1211-1214
• 22 Rondagh EJ, Masclee AA, van der Valk ME et al. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms: gender differences in prevalence and malignant potential. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 80-88
• 23 Bouwens MW, Winkens B, Rondagh EJ et al. Simple clinical risk score identifies patients with serrated polyps in routine practice. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013; 6: 855-863
• 24 Lu FI, van Niekerk deW, Owen D et al. Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34: 927-934
• 25 Spring KJ, Zhao ZZ, Karamatic R et al. High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1400-1407
• 26 Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise N eds. WHO classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics. Tumours of the digestive system. 4th edn. Lyon: IARC; 2010
• 27 Hetzel JT, Huang CS, Coukos JA et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2656-2664
• 28 Lash RH, Genta RM, Schuler CM. Sessile serrated adenomas: prevalence of dysplasia and carcinoma in 2139 patients. J Clin Pathol 2010; 63: 681-686
• 29 Messick CA, Church J, Bennett A et al. Serrated polyps: new classifications highlight clinical importance. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1328-1337
• 30 Hazewinkel Y, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM et al. Mo1190 Prevalence and characteristics of serrated lesions in individuals undergoing primary screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2013; 144-602
• 31 Kahi CJ, Li X, Eckert GJ et al. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 515-520
• 32 Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL et al. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 42-46
• 33 Singh H, Bay D, Ip S et al. Pathological reassessment of hyperplastic colon polyps in a city-wide pathology practice: implications for polyp surveillance recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1003-1008
• 34 Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Rubio C et al. Small colorectal serrated adenomas: endoscopic findings. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 1-3
• 35 Patel K, Hoffman NE. The anatomical distribution of colorectal polyps at colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 33: 222-225
• 36 Bufill JA. Colorectal cancer: evidence for distinct genetic categories based on proximal or distal tumor location. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 779-788
• 37 Wallace K, Grau MV, Ahnen D et al. The association of lifestyle and dietary factors with the risk for serrated polyps of the colorectum. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18: 2310-2317
• 38 Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 419-422
• 39 Boparai KS, van den Broek FJ, van Eeden S et al. Hyperplastic polyposis syndrome: a pilot study for the differentiation of polyps by using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 947-955
• 40 Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JI et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 3-47
• 41 Kimura T, Yamamoto E, Yamano HO et al. A novel pit pattern identifies the precursor of colorectal cancer derived from sessile serrated adenoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 460-469