Risk of recurrent gastric cancer after endoscopic resection with a positive lateral margin

Background and study aims: After noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for differentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC), close observation is often preferred when a cancer-positive lateral margin is the only noncurative factor. However, sometimes recurrence is found during the observation period. This study aimed to examine risk factors for recurrent cancer based on the long-term clinical outcomes after noncurative ESD in which the only noncurative factor was a cancer-positive lateral margin.

Patients and methods: Among 3784 EGCs (3316 patients) treated by ESD between 1997 and 2010, 77 noncurative differentiated-type EGCs (75 patients) were retrospectively analyzed after meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) the only noncurative factor was a cancer-positive lateral margin; 2) close observation was selected after the ESD; and 3) > 1 year follow-up after ESD.

Results: Locally recurrent cancer was found in 10 lesions within a median follow-up period of 59.8 months; no metastasis or gastric cancer-related death occurred. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence 5 years after ESD was 11.9 %. All locally recurrent cancers were mucosal differentiated-type adenocarcinomas. Multivariate analysis indicated that a cancer-positive lateral margin length of ≥ 6 mm was significantly associated with local recurrence (hazard ratio 20.8; 95 % confidence interval 5.2 % – 82.9 %; P < 0.001). The cut-off value of 6 mm was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve; the sensitivity and specificity for 5-year risk of developing local recurrence were 66.7 % and 95.6 %, respectively.

Conclusions: A cancer-positive lateral margin length of ≥ 6 mm was an independent risk factor for local recurrence, and this may be a useful criterion for selecting high-risk cases for stricter management.

• References

• 1 Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 2001; 48: 225-229
• 2 Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: technical feasibility, operation time and complications from a large consecutive series. Dig Endosc 2005; 17: 54-58
• 3 Oda I, Saito D, Tada M et al. A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2006; 9: 262-270
• 4 Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 2009; 58: 331-336
• 5 Gotoda T, Iwasaki M, Kusano C et al. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer treated by guideline and expanded National Cancer Centre criteria. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 868-871
• 6 Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 118-122
• 7 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 113-123
• 8 Korenaga D, Orita H, Maekawa S et al. Pathological appearance of the stomach after endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1563-1566
• 9 Nagano H, Ohyama S, Fukunaga T et al. Indications for gastrectomy after incomplete EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2005; 8: 149-154
• 10 Oda I, Gotoda T, Sasako M et al. Treatment strategy after non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1495-1500
• 11 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 101-112
• 12 Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J et al. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695-706
• 13 Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1988; 16: 1141-1154
• 14 Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Amer Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496-509
• 15 Takenaka R, Kawahara Y, Okada H et al. Risk factors associated with local recurrence of early gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 887-894
• 16 Park JC, Lee SK, Seo JH et al. Predictive factors for local recurrence after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: long-term clinical outcome in a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2842-2849
• 17 Jung H, Bae JM, Choi MG et al. Surgical outcome after incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 73-78
• 18 Yoon H, Kim SG, Choi J et al. Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1561-1568
• 19 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual/local recurrence of early gastric cancer after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 996-1000
• 20 Yokoi C, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection allows curative resection of locally recurrent early gastric cancer after prior endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 212-218
• 21 Fujishiro M, Goto O, Kakushima N et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of stomach neoplasms after unsuccessful endoscopic resection. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 566-571
• 22 Higashimaya M, Oka S, Tanaka S et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 298-302
• 23 Sekiguchi M, Suzuki H, Oda I et al. Favorable long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for locally recurrent early gastric cancer after endoscopic resection. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 708-713
• 24 Bae SY, Jang TH, Min BH et al. Early additional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with positive lateral resection margins after initial endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 432-436
• 25 Kikuchi D, Iizuka T, Hoteya S et al. Safety and efficacy of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric carcinoma after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection. Digestion 2012; 86: 288-293
• 26 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I et al. Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 877-883
• 27 Horiki N, Omata F, Uemura M et al. Risk for local recurrence of early gastric cancer treated with piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection during a 10-year follow-up period. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 72-78