Download PDF
Semin Thromb Hemost 2014; 40(02): 239-253
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365844
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

External Quality Assessment/Proficiency Testing and Internal Quality Control for the PFA-100 and PFA-200: An Update

Emmanuel J. Favaloro
1   Department of Haematology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), Pathology West, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
,
Roslyn Bonar
2   Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program Haematology, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 February 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Platelet function testing is an essential component of comprehensive hemostasis evaluation within the framework of bleeding and/or bruising investigations, and it may also be performed to evaluate antiplatelet medication effects. Globally, the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 (Siemens Healthcare, Marburg, Germany) is the most used primary hemostasis-screening instrument and has also been recently remodeled/upgraded to the PFA-200. The PFA-100 is sensitive to a wide range of associated disorders, including platelet function defects and von Willebrand disease (VWD), as well as to various antiplatelet medications. The PFA-100 is also useful in therapy monitoring, especially in VWD. External quality assessment (EQA) (or proficiency testing) and internal quality control (IQC) are critical to ensuring quality of test practice, inclusive of all hemostasis tests. However, both EQA and IQC for platelet function testing, including the PFA-100, is logistically challenging, given theoretical requirements for production, storage, and shipment of large volumes of “stabilized” normal and pathological blood/platelets covering both normal function plus a wide variety of potential defects. We accordingly describe the development and testing of novel feasible approaches to both EQA and IQC of PFA-100/PFA-200 instruments, whereby a range of formulated “platelet function antagonist” materials are utilized. For EQA purposes, these are distributed to participants, and citrated normal whole blood collected on site is then added locally, thereby creating test material that can be locally evaluated. Several exercises have been conducted by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) over the past 6 years. A total of 26 challenges, with most designed to mimic moderate to severe primary hemostasis defects, have been tested in 26 to 50 laboratories depending on the year of dispatch. Numerical results for PFA-100/PFA-200 closure times (CTs) and interpretive comments supplied by participants are analyzed by the RCPAQAP. During this period, reported CTs for each challenge were within limits of expectation and good reproducibility was evidenced by repeated challenges. Coefficients of variation (CVs) generated for challenges using the two major PFA-100/PFA-200 cartridge types (collagen/adenosine diphosphate and collagen/epinephrine) are always similar to those obtained using native whole blood, and in general range from 15 to 25%. Interpretations are also in general consistent with expectations and test data provided by laboratories. The EQA created material has also been assessed within the context of possible IQC material. In conclusion, EQA and IQC processes for the PFA-100/PFA-200 have been developed that include highly reproducible test challenge processes, not only supporting the concept that EQA/IQC is possible for platelet function testing but also providing a valuable mechanism for monitoring and improving laboratory performance in this area.

Keywords

PFA-100 - PFA-200 - platelet function analyzer - external quality assessment - proficiency testing - quality control - IQC - EQA
 

  • References

  • 1 Harrison P, Mackie I, Mumford A , et al; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines for the laboratory investigation of heritable disorders of platelet function. Br J Haematol 2011; 155 (1) 30-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Franchini M. Contemporary platelet function testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010; 48 (5) 579-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cattaneo M. Light transmission aggregometry and ATP release for the diagnostic assessment of platelet function. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35 (2) 158-167
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McGlasson DL, Fritsma GA. Whole blood platelet aggregometry and platelet function testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35 (2) 168-180
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Harrison P, Mumford A. Screening tests of platelet function: update on their appropriate uses for diagnostic testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35 (2) 150-157
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Favaloro EJ. Clinical utility of the PFA-100. Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34 (8) 709-733
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Adcock D. Quality in coagulation and haemostasis testing. Biochem Med 2010; 20: 184-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Olson JD, Preston FE, Nichols WL. External quality assurance in thrombosis and hemostasis: an international perspective. Semin Thromb Hemost 2007; 33 (3) 220-225
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Favaloro EJ. Internal quality control and external quality assurance of platelet function tests. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35 (2) 139-149
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hayward CP, Eikelboom J. Platelet function testing: quality assurance. Semin Thromb Hemost 2007; 33 (3) 273-282
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moffat KA, Ledford-Kraemer MR, Nichols WL, Hayward CP ; North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association. Variability in clinical laboratory practice in testing for disorders of platelet function: results of two surveys of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93 (3) 549-553
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jennings I, Woods TA, Kitchen S, Walker ID. Platelet function testing: practice among UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation participants, 2006. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61 (8) 950-954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Duncan EM, Bonar R, Rodgers SE, Favaloro EJ, Marsden K ; RCPA QAP in Haematology, Haemostasis Committee. Methodology and outcomes of platelet aggregation testing in Australia, New Zealand and the Asia-Pacific region: results of a survey from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Haematology Quality Assurance Program. Int J Lab Hematol 2009; 31 (4) 398-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cattaneo M, Hayward CP, Moffat KA, Pugliano MT, Liu Y, Michelson AD. Results of a worldwide survey on the assessment of platelet function by light transmission aggregometry: a report from the platelet physiology subcommittee of the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (6) 1029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Favaloro EJ, Bonar R, Duncan E, Rodgers S, Marsden K ; Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program in Haematology. Utility of the PFA-100 as a screening test of platelet function: an audit of haemostasis laboratories in Australia and New Zealand. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2007; 18 (5) 441-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kundu SK, Heilmann EJ, Sio R, Garcia C, Davidson RM, Ostgaard RA. Description of an in vitro platelet function analyzer—PFA-100. Semin Thromb Hemost 1995; 21 (Suppl. 02) 106-112
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Crescente M, Di Castelnuovo A, Iacoviello L, Vermylen J, Cerletti C, de Gaetano G. Response variability to aspirin as assessed by the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99 (1) 14-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Reny JL, De Moerloose P, Dauzat M, Fontana P. Use of the PFA-100 closure time to predict cardiovascular events in aspirin-treated cardiovascular patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (3) 444-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Crescente M, Di Castelnuovo A, Iacoviello L, de Gaetano G, Cerletti C. PFA-100 closure time to predict cardiovascular events in aspirin-treated cardiovascular patients: a meta-analysis of 19 studies comprising 3,003 patients. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99 (6) 1129-1131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lippi G, Franchini M, Brocco G, Manzato F. Influence of the ABO blood type on the platelet function analyzer PFA-100. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85 (2) 369-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lippi G, Fontana R, Avanzini P , et al. Influence of mechanical trauma of blood and hemolysis on PFA-100 testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2012; 23 (1) 82-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Favaloro EJ, Bonar R, Marsden K. Internal quality control and external quality assurance in testing for antiphospholipid antibodies: Part II—Lupus anticoagulant. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012; 38 (4) 404-411
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Favaloro EJ. Trials and tribulations in lupus anticoagulant testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013; 51 (2) 253-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bonar RA, Favaloro EJ, Marsden K. External quality assessment of factor VIII inhibitor assays. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (3) 320-326
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Favaloro EJ, Meijer P, Jennings I , et al. Problems and solutions in laboratory testing for hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (7) 816-833
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Favaloro EJ, Wheatland L, Jovanovich S, Roberts-Thomson P, Wong RCW. Internal quality control and external quality assurance in testing for antiphospholipid antibodies: Part I—Anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012; 38 (4) 390-403
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Favaloro EJ. Time for a conceptual shift in assessment of internal quality control for whole blood or cell-based testing systems? An evaluation using platelet function and the PFA-100 as a case example. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013; 51 (4) 767-774
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Cunningham MT, Brandt JT, Chandler WL , et al. Quality assurance in hemostasis: the perspective from the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program. Semin Thromb Hemost 2007; 33 (3) 250-258
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Favaloro EJ, Bonar R. External quality assurance for the PFA-100®. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9 (4) 878-880
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Favaloro EJ, Bonar R. Proficiency testing/external quality assurance for the PFA-100(®). Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50 (8) 1393-1401
    PubMedGoogle Scholar