PDF herunterladen
Endoscopy 2014; 46(09): 817
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367670
Correction
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Jeong-Seon Ji
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
,
Seung-Woo Lee
2   Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
,
Tae Ho Kim
3   Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea
,
Young-Seok Cho
4   Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
,
Hyung-Keun Kim
4   Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
,
Kang-Moon Lee
5   Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
,
Sang-Woo Kim
6   Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
,
Hwang Choi
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
29. August 2014 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Originalartikel zu diesem Erratum:

Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter studyEndoscopy 2014; 46(07): 598-604
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365515

Jeong-Seon Ji, Seung-Woo Lee, Tae Ho Kim et al. Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Endoscopy 2014: 46: 598–604.

The stalk diameter in Table 4 was incorrect. The correct table is inserted below.

Table 4

Bleeding risk according to stalk diameter.

Bleeding polyps
(n = 11)

Nonbleeding polyps
(n = 192)

Odds ratio

95 %CI

Stalk diameter ≤ 10 mm, n (%)

6 (54.5)

175 (91.1)

1.00

Stalk diameter > 10 mm, n (%)

5 (45.5)

17 (8.9)

8.57

2.36 – 31.07

CI, confidence interval.