AG Ultraschall – Kontrastmittelsonografie (CEUS) in der Radiologie: Eine erste Analyse und kritische Betrachtung der AGUS

• Literatur

• 1 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2013; 39: 187-210
• 2 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver—update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2013; 34: 11-29
• 3 Clevert DA, D‘Anastasi M, Jung EM. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microcirculation: efficiency through dynamics—current developments. Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation 2013; 53: 171-186
• 4 Fischer T, Sack I, Thomas A. Characterization of focal breast lesions by means of elastografy. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2013; 185: 816-823
• 5 Jung EM, Wiggermann P, Stroszczynski C et al. [Ultrasound diagnostics of diffuse liver diseases]. Der Radiologe 2012; 52: 706-716
• 6 Clevert DA, Jung EM. [Interventional sonografy of the liver and kidneys]. Der Radiologe 2013; 53: 962-973
• 7 Gurtler VM, Sommer WH, Meimarakis G et al. A comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and multislice computed tomografy in detecting and classifying endoleaks in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair. Journal of vascular surgery 2013; 58: 340-345
• 8 Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of small (</= 20 mm) and subcentimetric (</= 10 mm) focal liver lesions in comparison with histology. Results of the DEGUM multicenter trial. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2011; 32: 593-597
• 9 Greis C. [Summary of technical principles of contrast sonografy and future perspectives]. Der Radiologe 2011; 51: 456-461