Neuroendoscopy and High-Field Intraoperative MRI: First Experience

Abstract

Background To date, information about the use of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in patients undergoing neuroendoscopic procedures is sparse. The benefit may be (re)definition of neuronavigation, confirmation of fenestrations and biopsies, detection of complications, and redefinition of anatomical changes during the operation.

Material and Methods Our setting consists of a fully integrated high-field 1.5-T MRI into the operating room. The operating room can be functionally divided into (1) the MRI scanner and (2) the operating table outside the 5 Gauss line where ferromagnetic surgical instruments can be used. We included a consecutive series of 11 adult patients who underwent 11 endoscopic operations in the iMRI setting between January 2007 and September 2011.

Results The median age of patients was 54 years (range: 40–69 years). The male-to-female ratio was 4.5:1. Diagnoses leading to endoscopic treatment were aqueductal stenosis (n = 8; caused by tumors in three cases), pineal cyst (n = 1), tumor of the third ventricle (n = 1), and brain abscess with ventriculitis (n = 1). Endoscopic procedures were endoscopic third ventriculostomy with or without tumor biopsy (n = 5), aqueductoplasty (n = 4), tumor biopsy and septostomy (n = 1), and tumor resection (n = 1). All patients were scanned at least once, seven patients twice during surgery. The mean scan time per procedure was 19 minutes. The following sequences were regarded as most useful: T2 axial (placement of catheter, ruling out of complications), T2 sagittal (flow void signal), and true fast imaging (TRUFI) (fenestration defect).

Conclusions iMRI enables high-resolution imaging immediately after endoscopic operation. The combined use is technically feasible and of potential value in selected cases with complex hydrocephalus. In most of these cases, scanning can be limited to T2 axial, T2 sagittal, and TRUFI MR images.

Keywords

neuroendoscopy - intraoperative MRI - endoscopic third ventriculostomy - aqueductoplasty - tumor

• References

• 1 Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Wong TZ , et al. Intraoperative MR imaging guidance for intracranial neurosurgery: experience with the first 200 cases. Radiology 1999; 211 (2) 477-488
• 2 Nimsky C. Intraoperative MRI in glioma surgery: proof of benefit?. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12 (11) 982-983
• 3 Nabavi A, Dörner L, Stark AM, Mehdorn HM. Intraoperative MRI with 1.5.  Tesla in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2009; 20 (2) 163-171
• 4 Di Rocco C, Cinalli G, Massimi L, Spennato P, Cianciulli E, Tamburrini G. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2006; 31: 119-219
• 5 Li KW, Nelson C, Suk I, Jallo GI. Neuroendoscopy: past, present, and future. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (6) E1
• 6 Sandberg DI. Endoscopic management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Child Neurol 2008; 23 (5) 550-560
• 7 Zada G, Liu C, Apuzzo ML. “Through the looking glass”: optical physics, issues, and the evolution of neuroendoscopy. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (1) 92-102
• 8 Vanhauwaert D, Hallaert G, Baert E, Van Roost D, Okito JP, Caemaert J. Treatment of cystic craniopharyngioma by endocavitary instillation of yttrium⁹⁰ radioisotope–still a valuable treatment option. J Neurol Surg A Cen Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74: 307-312
• 9 Van Rompaey J, Bush C, McKinnon B, Solares AC. Minimally invasive access to the posterior cranial fossa: an anatomical study comparing a retrosigmoidal endoscopic approach to a microscopic approach. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (1) 1-6
• 10 Lee JY, Barroeta JE, Newman JG, Chiu AG, Venneti S, Grady MS. Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base meningiomas and mucosa: implications for resection, reconstruction, and recurrence. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (1) 12-17
• 11 Inoue D, Yoshimoto K, Uemura M , et al. Three-dimensional high-definition neuroendoscopic surgery: a controlled comparative laboratory study with two-dimensional endoscopy and clinical application. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013; 74 (6) 357-365
• 12 Paraskevopoulos D, Biyani N, Constantini S, Beni-Adani L. Combined intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and navigated neuroendoscopy in children with multicompartmental hydrocephalus and complex cysts: a feasibility study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 8 (3) 279-288
• 13 Tabakow P, Czyz M, Jarmundowicz W, Zub W. Neuroendoscopy combined with intraoperative low-field magnetic imaging for treatment of multiloculated hydrocephalus in a 7-month-old infant: technical case report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011; 54 (3) 138-141
• 14 Bouras T, Sgouros S. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 7 (6) 643-649
• 15 Stark AM, Hugo HH, Nabavi A, Mehdorn HM. Papillary Ependymoma WHO grade II of the aqueduct treated by endoscopic tumor resection. Case Rep Med 2009; 2009: 434905
• 16 Buchfelder M, Schlaffer SM. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during surgery for pituitary adenomas: pros and cons. Endocrine 2012; 42 (3) 483-495
• 17 Lucas JW, Zada G. Endoscopic surgery for pituitary tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2012; 23 (4) 555-569
• 18 Ammirati M, Wei L, Ciric I. Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84 (8) 843-849