One versus Two Venous Anastomoses in Microsurgical Free Flaps: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background Various reports suggest the augmentation of venous drainage through performing two venous anastomoses as a means of reducing the rate of thrombosis in free flap surgery. However, some suggest dual venous drainage may actually reduce venous blood flow velocity causing a potential risk for thrombosis.

Methods  On the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematics Reviews and Meta-analysis statement, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases. A total of 12,190 articles relating to “free flaps” and “one versus two venous anastomoses” were found between January 1992 and November 2012. Of the 12,190 articles, 23 studies were included in a meta-analysis performed using STATA 11.2 (StrataCorp, College Station, TX). Studies with case control groups for both single and double venous anastomoses and clearly defined results for flap failure and venous thrombosis were included. 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each study and pooled in both fixed and random-effects models for both flap failure and venous thrombosis events.

Results The analysis shows a significant reduction in flap failure (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41–0.99; p = 0.03) and venous thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46–0.97; p = 0.047) when performing two venous anastomoses compared with one in free flap surgery.

Conclusion The results show that performing two venous anastomoses is associated with a reduction in the incidence of flap failure by 36% and venous thrombosis by 34% compared with one venous anastomoses. Given that the performing of an additional venous anastomoses confers a lower risk of complication and is technically feasible, where possible two venous anastomoses should be performed in free flap procedures, however, this should be decided on a flap by flap basis.

Keywords

venous anastomoses - one - two - single - dual

Note

This paper was presented at the WSRM 2013 in Chicago as a scientific paper.

• References

• 1 Hallock GG. Both superficial and deep extremity veins can be used successfully as the recipient site for free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 44 (6) 633-636
• 2 Yang G, Chen B, Gao W , et al. Forearm free skin flap transplantation. Natl Med J China 1981; 61 (1) 139-141
• 3 Alan Turner MJ, Smith WP. Double venous anastomosis for the radial artery forearm flap. Improving success and minimising morbidity. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009; 37 (5) 253-257
• 4 Mühlbauer W, Herndl E, Stock W. The forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 70 (3) 336-344
• 5 Demirkan F, Wei F-C, Lutz BS, Cher TS, Chen IH. Reliability of the venae comitantes in venous drainage of the free radial forearm flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (5) 1544-1548
• 6 Khashaba AA, McGregor IA. Haemodynamics of the radial forearm flap. Br J Plast Surg 1986; 39 (4) 441-450
• 7 Futran ND, Stack Jr BCJ. Single versus dual venous drainage of the radial forearm free flap. Am J Otolaryngol 1996; 17 (2) 112-117
• 8 Hanasono MM, Kocak E, Ogunleye O, Hartley CJ, Miller MJ. One versus two venous anastomoses in microvascular free flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (5) 1548-1557
• 9 Ichinose A, Terashi H, Nakahara M , et al. Do multiple venous anastomoses reduce risk of thrombosis in free-flap transfer? Efficacy of dual anastomoses of separate venous systems. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (1) 61-63
• 10 Enajat M, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Smit JM, Acosta R. A single center comparison of one versus two venous anastomoses in 564 consecutive DIEP flaps: investigating the effect on venous congestion and flap survival. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (3) 185-191
• 11 Rohleder NH, Wolff KD, Hölzle F , et al. Secondary maxillofacial reconstruction with the radial forearm free flap: a standard operating procedure for the venous microanastomoses. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (7) 1980-1987
• 12 Ross GL, Ang ESW, Golger A , et al. Which venous system to choose for anastomosis in head and neck reconstructions?. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (4) 396-398
• 13 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 (4) 264-269 , W64
• 14 Tang Z, Zhou Z, Wang D , et al. Free radial forearm flaps: An overview of our clinical experience and exploration of relevant issues. IEEE 2012; 1: 524-528
• 15 Selber JC, Sanders E, Lin H, Yu P. Venous drainage of the radial forearm flap: comparison of the deep and superficial systems. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (4) 347-350
• 16 Eom JS, Sun S-H, Lee TJ. Selection of the recipient veins for additional anastomosis of the superficial inferior epigastric vein in breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67 (5) 505-509
• 17 Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (3) 792-798
• 18 Lin P-Y, Kuo Y-R, Chien C-Y, Jeng S-F. Reconstruction of head and neck cancer with double flaps: comparison of single and double recipient vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (3) 191-195
• 19 Liu Y, Jiang X, Huang J , et al. Reliability of the superficial venous drainage of the radial forearm free flaps in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (4) 243-247
• 20 Liu Y, Zhao YF, Huang JT , et al. Analysis of 13 cases of venous compromise in 178 radial forearm free flaps for intraoral reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41 (4) 448-452
• 21 Lorenzo AR, Lin C-H, Lin C-H , et al. Selection of the recipient vein in microvascular flap reconstruction of the lower extremity: analysis of 362 free-tissue transfers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (5) 649-655
• 22 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H , et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (6) 363-368 discussion 369
• 23 Smit JM, Whitaker IS, Liss AG, Audolfsson T, Kildal M, Acosta R. Post operative monitoring of microvascular breast reconstructions using the implantable Cook-Swartz doppler system: a study of 145 probes & technical discussion. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (10) 1286-1292
• 24 Spector JA, Levine S, Levine JP. Free tissue transfer to the lower extremity distal to the zone of injury: indications and outcomes over a 25-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (4) 952-959
• 25 Tsai Y-T, Lin T-S. The suitability of end-to-side microvascular anastomosis in free flap transfer for limb reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (2) 171-174
• 26 Yamashiro M, Hasegawa K, Uzawa N , et al. Complications and Outcome of Free Flap Transfers for Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction: Analysis of 213 Cases. Int J Oral Sci 2009; 6 (1) 46-54
• 27 Zhang T, Lubek J, Salama A , et al. Venous anastomoses using microvascular coupler in free flap head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (4) 992-996
• 28 Joo Y-H, Sun D-I, Park J-O, Cho K-J, Kim M-S. Risk factors of free flap compromise in 247 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (10) 1629-1633
• 29 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR , et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (3) 711-721
• 30 Sun G, Lu M, Hu Q, Tang E, Yang X, Wang Z. Clinical application of thin anterolateral thigh flap in the reconstruction of intraoral defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115 (2) 185-191
• 31 Xin Q, Luan J, Mu H, Mu L. Augmentation of venous drainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: efficacy and advancement. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (5) 313-318