RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377524
Accuracy and concordance of endocytoscopic atypia for the diagnosis of gastric cancer
Publikationsverlauf
submitted 20. Januar 2014
accepted after revision 31. Mai 2014
Publikationsdatum:
18. Juli 2014 (online)
Background and aim: High-grade atypia demonstrated by endocytoscopy may be a key criterion for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. We therefore sought to verify whether endocytoscopic atypia can provide satisfactory levels of diagnostic accuracy and concordance among trainee and expert endoscopists.
Method: A total of 100 lesions evaluated by endocytoscopy and histopathology were enrolled to create an endocytoscopic image catalog (44 early cancers, 10 low-grade adenomas, 46 non-neoplastic lesions). Four endoscopists (two trainees and two experts) independently reviewed the catalog images and evaluated each of them for the presence or absence of endocytoscopic atypia. High-grade endocytoscopic atypia, as a criterion for cancer diagnosis, was defined as the consistent observation of any of the following features: lumen absence, lumen fusion, and irregular nuclei showing the three typical features (heterogeneous shape, swelling, and disarrangement).
Results: High-grade endocytoscopic atypia was observed in 78 %, 18 %, and 4 % of cancers, adenomas, and non-neoplastic lesions, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for cancer diagnosis by endocytoscopy were 78.4 %, 93.3 %, 87.3 %, 85.4 %, and 87.3 %, respectively. The concordance rate for the results of high-grade endocytoscopic atypia was good among the four endoscopists (κ value 0.682). No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy or concordance was observed between trainee and expert endoscopists.
Conclusion: Using the defined high-grade atypia as a diagnostic criterion of cancer, endocytoscopy provided a satisfactory level of accuracy and concordance for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer, regardless of endoscopic expertise.
-
References
- 1 Kumagai Y, Monma K, Kawada K. Magnifying chromoendoscopy of the esophagus: in-vivo pathological diagnosis using an endocytoscopy system. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 590-594
- 2 Inoue H, Kudo SE, Shiokawa A. Technology insight: Laser-scanning confocal microscopy and endocytoscopy for cellular observation of the gastrointestinal tract. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 2: 31-37
- 3 Neumann H, Fuchs FS, Vieth M et al. Review article: in vivo imaging by endocytoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1183-1193
- 4 Shimizu Y, Takahashi M, Yoshida T et al. Endoscopic in vivo cellular imaging of superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by using an integrated endocytoscopy system (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 351-358
- 5 Inoue H, Sasajima K, Kaga M et al. Endoscopic in vivo evaluation of tissue atypia in the esophagus using a newly designed integrated endocytoscope: a pilot trial. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 891-895
- 6 Kumagai Y, Kawada K, Yamazaki S et al. Endocytoscopic observation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 10-16
- 7 Pohl H, Rosch T, Tanczos B et al. Endocytoscopy for the detection of microstructural features in adult patients with celiac sprue: a prospective, blinded endocytoscopy-conventional histology correlation study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70; 933-941
- 8 Neumann H, Kudo S, Vieth M et al. Real-time in vivo histologic examination using a probe-based endoscopy system for differentiating duodenal polyps. Endoscopy 2013; 45: E53-E54
- 9 Kudo S, Wakamura K, Ikehara N et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with a novel endocytoscopic classification – a pilot study. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 869-875
- 10 Neumann H, Vieth M, Neurath MF et al. Endocytoscopy allows accurate in vivo differentiation of mucosal inflammatory cells in IBD: a pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 356-362
- 11 Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Rotondano G et al. Endocytoscopy can identify dysplasia in aberrant crypt foci of the colorectum: a prospective in vivo study. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 129-132
- 12 Eberl T, Jechart G, Probst A et al. Can an endocytoscope system (ECS) predict histology in neoplastic lesions?. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 497-501
- 13 Fasoli A, Pugliese V, Furnari M et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: correlation between endocytoscopy and histology. Endoscopy 2009; 41: E65-E66
- 14 Kaise M, Ohkura Y, Iizuka T et al. Endocytoscopy is a promising modality with high diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2014; In press
- 15 Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut 2002; 51: 130-131
- 16 Tamai N, Kaise M, Nakayoshi T et al. Clinical and endoscopic characterization of depressed gastric adenoma. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 391-394
- 17 Endoh Y, Tamura G, Motoyama T et al. Well differentiated adenocarcinoma mimicking complete-type intestinal metaplasia in the stomach. Hum Pathol 1999; 30: 826-832
- 18 Kobayashi M, Hashimoto S, Nishikura K et al. Magnifying narrow-band imaging of surface maturation in early differentiated-type gastric cancers after Helicobacter pylori eradication. J Gastroenterol 2013; 48: 1332-1342
- 19 Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M. Review of histological classifications of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists. J Gastroenterol 2001; 36: 445-456