Download PDF
Aktuelle Dermatologie 2014; 40(12): 504-509
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378079
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endovenöse Therapieverfahren

Endovenous Minimal Invasive Therapy Options
K. Hartmann
Venenzentrum Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2014 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die endovenösen Verfahren gibt es inzwischen seit mehr als 10 Jahren und zusammen mit der Stripping-Operation geben sie dem Phlebologen die Möglichkeit, besser als jemals zuvor den Patienten zu beraten und ein individuell abgestimmtes Therapieschema aufzustellen. Varizen können heutzutage mittels Thermik durch Radiofrequenz, Laser oder Heißdampf verschlossen werden. Weiterhin können insuffiziente Venen auch ohne Hitze mittels spezieller Verödungskatheter oder durch „Sekundenkleber“ verschlossen werden.

Abstract

Endovenous techniques to treat varicose veins are getting more and more popular and together with the stripping operation they offer a wide variety in treatment options to the phlebologist. Varicose veins can now be treated with radiofrequency, laser and steam and also with special sclerotherapy catheters and glue.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Noppeney T. Ergebnisse nach Radiofrequenzobliteration. Review. Phlebologie 2010; 39: 72-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alm J, Böhme J, Kensy M. VNUS Closure radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins. Phlebologie 2010; 39: 61-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boné C. Tratamiento endoluminal de las varices con laser de Diodo. Estudio preliminary. Rev Patol Vasc 1999; 5: 35-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Navarro L, Min RJ, Boné C. Endovenous laser: a new minimally invasive method of treatment for varicose veins – preliminary observations using an 810 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 117-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sroka R, Weick K, Sadeghi-Azandaryani M et al. Endovenous laser therapy – application studies and latest investigations. J Biophotonics 2010; 3: 269-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 van den Bos RR, Arends L, Kockaert M et al. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: a metaanalysis. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49: 230-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B et al. EVOLVeS Study. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 207-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Pera J et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: A randomized controlled trial with comparison of costs. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 958-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Proebstle TM. Endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation (Closure FAST) of great saphenous veins. Phlebologie 2010; 39: 69-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pannier F, Rabe E, Rits J et al. Endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous veins using a 1470 nm diode laser and the radial fibre – follow-up after six months. Phlebology 2011; 26: 35-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Markovic JN, Shortell CK. Update on Radiofrequency Ablation. Pers Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2009; 21: 82-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Proebstle TM et al. for the European Closure Fast Clinical Study Group. Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 146-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hartmann K. ClariVein® – Neues Kathetersystem zur Behandlung der Stammvarikosis. Phlebologie 2011; 40: 279-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hartmann K. Interventionelle Therapie der Varikosis mit hocherhitztem Dampf. Phlebologie 2011; 40: 31-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hartman K. Tipps und Tricks bei der VNUS-Closure-Fast-Therapie der Varikosis. Phlebologie 2011; 40: 221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Camci M, Harnoss B, Akkersdijk G. Effectivness and tolerability of bipolar radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebologie 2009; 38: 5-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Boon R, Akkersdijk GJ, Nio D. Percutaneus treatment of varicose veins with bipolar radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 43-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Corcos L, Dini S, De Anna D et al. The immediate effects of endovenous diode 808-nm laser in greater saphenous vein: morphologic study and clinical implications. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 1018-1024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 van den Bos RR, Kockaert MA, Neumann HA et al. Technical review of endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 35: 88-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Timperman PE, Sichlau M, Ryu RK. Greater energy delivery improves treatment success of endovenous laser treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15: 1061-1063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Proebstle TM, Sandhofer M, Kargl A et al. Thermal damage of the inner vein wall during endovenous treatment: key role of energy absorption by intravascular blood. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 596-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Proebstle TM, Lehr HA, Kargl A et al. Endovenous treatment of the greater saphenous vein with a 940 nm diode laser: thrombotic occlusion after endoluminal thermal damage by laser generated steam bubbles. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 729-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Almeida J, Mackay E, Javier J et al. Saphenous laser ablation at 1470 nm targets the vein wall, not blood. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2009; 43: 467-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Proebstle TM, Moehler T, Gul D et al. Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1320-nm Nd:YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940-nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 1678-1684
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kabnick LS. Outcome of different endovenous laser wavelengths for great saphenous vein ablation. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 88-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Doganci S, Demirkilic U. Comparison of 980 nm laser and bare-tip fibre with 1470 nm laser and radial fibre in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 254-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Elias S, Raines JK. Mechanochemical tumescentless endovenous ablation: final results of the initial clinical trial. Phlebology 2011; 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 van Eekeren RR, Boersma D, Elias S et al. Endovenous mechanochemical ablation of great saphenous vein incompetence using the ClariVein device: a safety study. J Endovasc Ther 2011; 18: 328-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Welch HJ. Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006; 44: 601-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with and without ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction: 2-year results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36: 713-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Theivacumar NS, Dellagrammaticas D, Beale RJ et al. Fate and clinical significance of saphenofemoral junction tributaries following endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 722-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Creton D, Pichot O, Sessa C et al. Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24: 360-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Spreafico G, Kabnick L, Berland TL et al. Laser saphenous ablations in more than 1,000 limbs with long-term duplex examination follow-up. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25: 71-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mozes G, Kalra M, Carmo M et al. Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 130-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Marsh P, Price BA, Holdstock J et al. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous thermoablation techniques: rates of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and classical DVT after radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation in a single centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 521-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar