Background and study aims: Following the results of a major UK study showing that once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG) screening significantly reduced colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality, an FSIG screening program in England was announced in late 2010. Three “early pilot” sites were selected in 2011 in Derby, South of Tyne, and Tees to assess the practicalities of the delivery of FSIG screening.
Participants and methods: Eligible people aged 55 from selected practices in the three early pilot areas received postal invitations to participate. The South of Tyne and Derby sites employed interactive models of screening invitation, while Tees used a simple invitation. Data were collected to assess uptake, process, and outcome. A self-completion participant satisfaction questionnaire was sent to all participants 1 month after attendance.
Results: A total of 4023 55-year-olds were invited to participate. Uptake was 29 %, with 1151 people screened over a 3-month period. Screening uptake differed by method of invitation: a simple approach was significantly more successful than an interactive one (32 % vs. 27 %, P = 0.0015). Uptake decreased significantly with increasing deprivation. Adenomas were found in 111 (9.8 %) of those screened and cancer in two. The procedure was rated “very” or “fairly” acceptable by 97 % of participants. Over 90 % of respondents said they would participate in future cancer screening and a similar proportion would recommend doing so to others.
Conclusion: Delivery of an FSIG screening program to prevent CRC is feasible and should be implemented using a simple invitation system. The national Bowel Scope program subsequently commenced at pilot sites in May 2013, with full implementation planned by 2016.
4 Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M et al. Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995–99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8: 773-783
7 Atkin WS, Cook CF, Cuzick J et al. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1291-1300
8 Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B et al. The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) Screening Study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50–64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 635-642
9 Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B et al. Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of “Once-Only Sigmoidoscopy” - SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1763-1772
10 Weissfeld JL, Schoen RE, Pinsky PF et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 989-997
12 Tappenden P, Eggington S, Nixon R et al. Colorectal cancer screening options appraisal: cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and resourse impact of alternative screening options for colorectal cancer. Report to the English Bowel Cancer Screening Working Group. 2004 Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/scharr.pdf Accessed: 27 August 2014
14 Tappenden P, Chilcott J, Eggington S et al. Option appraisal of population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in England. Gut 2007; 56: 677-684
15 Logan RFA, Patnick J, Nickerson C et al. Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut 2012; 61: 1439-1446
16 Gavin DR, Valori RM, Anderson JT et al. The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut 2013; 62: 242-249
20 University College London. The ASCEND Study: Strategies to reduce the social gradient in bowel cancer screening. Available at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dahr/research_pages/ascend Accessed: 27 August 2014
23 Ladas SD, Karamanolis G, Ben-Soussan E. Colonic explosion during therapeutic colonoscopy with electrocautery. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 5295-5298
