PDF herunterladen
J Knee Surg 2015; 28(03): 223-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378193
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reliability of Intra-articular Rotational Axes at Standard Tibial Resection Level and Effect of Resecting Distally

Yoshvin Sunnassee
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Henghui Zhang
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Edward P. Southern
3   Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
4   Institute for Western Surgery, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Yi Wang
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Yuhui Shen
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

14. September 2013

13. April 2014

Publikationsdatum:
16. Juli 2014 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

We determine the most reliable tibial intra-articular axis for rotational alignment of the tibial component at the standard resection level and at a distal resection level. The angles between the surgical transepicondylar axis and posterior condylar line, perpendicular to Akagi line, tibial anterior condylar line (ACL), and tibial maximum mediolateral line were measured at the standard resection level and 5 mm distal to the standard resection level. All axes exhibited relatively large standard deviations and ranges at the standard and distal resection level. t-test showed that there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for all the axes between the two resection levels, while only ACL showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.047) with the equality of variance F-test. Akagi line exhibited good interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities but must be used with caution. Intra-articular axes are not reliable for tibial component alignment.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - tibial component - rotational alignment
 

  • References

  • 1 Incavo SJ, Coughlin KM, Pappas C, Beynnon BD. Anatomic rotational relationships of the proximal tibia, distal femur, and patella: implications for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (5) 643-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (226) 49-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Victor J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95 (5) 365-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Howell S, Chen J, Hull M. Variability of the location of the tibial tubercle affects the rotational alignment of the tibial component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2288-2295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fukagawa S, Matsuda S, Mitsuyasu H , et al. Anterior border of the tibia as a landmark for extramedullary alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty for varus knees. J Orthop Res 2011; 29 (6) 919-924
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C. Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 172-176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, Tang T, Rubash HE, Li G. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (1) 124-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kamath AF, Horneff JG, Gaffney V, Israelite CL, Nelson CL. Ethnic and gender differences in the functional disparities after primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (12) 3355-3361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286) 40-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Ohashi H, Yamano Y. Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (402) 196-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420) 213-219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Siston RA, Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452 (452) 65-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Eckhoff DG, Metzger RG, Vandewalle MV. Malrotation associated with implant alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 28-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Huddleston JI, Scott RD, Wimberley DW. Determination of neutral tibial rotational alignment in rotating platform TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440 (440) 101-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ikeuchi M, Yamanaka N, Okanoue Y, Ueta E, Tani T. Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacement: a comparison of two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (1) 45-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rossi R, Bruzzone M, Bonasia DE, Marmotti A, Castoldi F. Evaluation of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (7) 889-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM, Bellemans J. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?. Knee 2009; 16 (5) 358-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bell SW, Young P, Drury C , et al. Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014; 21 (1) 272-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Şahin N, Atıcı T, Öztürk A, Özkaya G, Özkan Y, Avcu B. Accuracy of anatomical references used for rotational alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (3) 565-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Şahin N, Atıcı T, Kurtoğlu Ü, Turgut A, Özkaya G, Özkan Y. Centre of the posterior cruciate ligament and the sulcus between tubercle spines are reliable landmarks for tibial component placement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2384-2391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kawahara S, Matsuda S, Okazaki K , et al. Relationship between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the surgical epicondylar axis in varus and valgus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (10) 2077-2081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Graw BP, Harris AH, Tripuraneni KR, Giori NJ. Rotational references for total knee arthroplasty tibial components change with level of resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (10) 2734-2738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar