Synthesis 2014; 46(22): 3075-3084
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379004
paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Efficient and Practical Procedure for the Esterification of the Free α-Carboxylic Acid of Amino Acid Residues with β-(Trimethylsilyl)ethoxymethyl Chloride and Triisopropylsilyl Chloride

Jean-Simon Suppo
a   Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253 CNRS-UM2-UM1-ENSCM; Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, 8 Rue de l’Ecole Normale­, 34296 Montpellier Cedex 5, France   Fax: +33(4)67144322   eMail: renata.marcia_de_figueiredo@enscm.fr
,
Danilo Pereira de Sant’Ana
a   Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253 CNRS-UM2-UM1-ENSCM; Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, 8 Rue de l’Ecole Normale­, 34296 Montpellier Cedex 5, France   Fax: +33(4)67144322   eMail: renata.marcia_de_figueiredo@enscm.fr
b   Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, P. O. Box 6154, 13084-971 Campinas-SP, Brazil
,
Luiz Carlos Dias
b   Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, P. O. Box 6154, 13084-971 Campinas-SP, Brazil
,
Renata Marcia de Figueiredo*
a   Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253 CNRS-UM2-UM1-ENSCM; Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, 8 Rue de l’Ecole Normale­, 34296 Montpellier Cedex 5, France   Fax: +33(4)67144322   eMail: renata.marcia_de_figueiredo@enscm.fr
,
Jean-Marc Campagne*
a   Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253 CNRS-UM2-UM1-ENSCM; Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, 8 Rue de l’Ecole Normale­, 34296 Montpellier Cedex 5, France   Fax: +33(4)67144322   eMail: renata.marcia_de_figueiredo@enscm.fr
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 23. Juni 2014

Accepted after revision: 29. Juli 2014

Publikationsdatum:
26. August 2014 (online)


Dedicated to Professor Dr. Dieter Enders

Abstract

An efficient and practical procedure for the free α-carboxylic acid esterification of amino acid residues with β-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxymethyl chloride and triisopropylsilyl chloride is described. The reaction takes place under mild conditions and the expected protected amino acids are obtained in good to excellent yields. Our method provides a useful alternative for the C-terminal carboxylic acid protection of amino acids and peptides. Moreover, the removal of such protection was also achieved under mild conditions, without affecting either the other protecting groups at the α-amino moiety and side chains or the optical integrity at the α-position of the amino acid residues. Examples of their use in peptide synthesis are also illustrated.

Supporting Information

 
  • References

  • 1 Barany G, Merrifield RB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977; 99: 7363
  • 2 Barany G, Albericio F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 4936
  • 3 Isidro-Llobet A, Álvarez M, Albericio F. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 2455 ; and references cited therein
  • 5 Suppo J.-S, Subra G, Bergès M, Marcia de Figueiredo R, Campagne J.-M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 5389
  • 6 For a general review on the use or organosilicon reagents as protecting groups in organic synthesis, see: Lalonde M, Chan TH. Synthesis 1985; 817
  • 7 Greene TW, Wuts PG. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis . 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons; Hoboken: 2007
    • 8a Sieber P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1977; 60: 2711
    • 8b Sieber P, Andreatta RH, Eisler K, Kamber B, Riniker B, Rink H In Peptides, Proceedings of the 5th American Peptide Symposium . Goodman M, Meienhofer J. Wiley; New York: 1977: 543
    • 9a With DCC: Schmidt U, Zäh M, Lieberknecht A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991; 1002
    • 9b With DIC: Fécourt F, Sapi J, Bourguet E. Synlett 2010; 399

    • With EDCI:
    • 9c Boger DL, Yohannes D. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 6000
    • 9d Wang T, Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 13244
    • 9e Banala S, Ensle P, Süssmuth RD. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 9518
  • 10 Wagner M, Kunz H. Synlett 2000; 400
  • 11 Borsuk K, van Delft FL, Eggen IF, ten Kortenaar PB. W, Petersen A, Rutjes PJ. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 3585
  • 12 Li W.-R, Ewing WR, Harris BD, Joullié MM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 7659
  • 13 Jou G, Gonzàlez I, Albericio F, Lloyd-Williams P, Giralt E. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 354
  • 14 Chen W.-C, Vera MD, Joullié MM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997; 38: 4025
  • 15 Soto-Cairoli B, Kock I, de Pomar JJ, Yang G, Guzmán JM, González JR, Antomattei A, Soderquist JA. Heterocycles 2010; 80: 409
  • 16 Bridoux A, Cui H, Dyskin E, Schmitzer A.-R, Yalcin M, Mousa SA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010; 20: 3394
  • 17 Nefkens GH. L, Thuring JW. J. F, Zwanenburg B. Synthesis 1997; 290

    • Selected examples:
    • 18a Schnabel E, Klostermeyer H, Berndt H. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1971; 749: 90
    • 18b Akaji K, Fujii N, Yajima H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985; 33: 173
    • 18c Huffman GW, Gesellchen PD, Turner JR, Rothenberger RB, Osborne HE, Miller FD, Chapman JL, Queener SW. J. Med. Chem. 1992; 35: 1897
    • 18d Bachi MD, Breiman R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980; 11
  • 19 Bodansky M In Principles of Peptide Synthesis . Hafner K, Lehn J.-M, Rees CW, Schleyer PvR, Trost BN, Zahradnik R. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1994
  • 20 It might be mentioned that Fmoc-protected amino acids were robust to the optimized reaction conditions. When only 1.1 equiv of DCA was used as the base to promote our esterification, no Fmoc-cleavage was observed.
  • 21 It should be noted that O-SEM derivatives are less robust than their O-TIPS parents towards long column chromatography purification on silica gel. With O-SEM analogues, short pad column purifications are suggested in order to reach higher yields, but there is no need for pretreatment of the SiO2 with Et3N.
  • 22 Paterson I, Britton R, Delgado O, Gardner NM, Meyer A, Naylor GJ, Poullennec KG. Tetrahedron 2010; 66: 6534
  • 23 For compound 1h (Novabiochem Merck Millipore Corporation): described [α]D 25 +7.7 (c 1.0, EtOH); found after protection and deprotection with TIPSCl [α]D 20 +9.3 (c 1.07, EtOH). For compound 1b (Sigma–Aldrich): described [α]D 20 –18 (c 1.0, DMF); found after protection and deprotection with SEMCl [α]D 20 –19.2 (c 1.0, DMF), and with TIPSCl [α]D 20 –19.8 (c 1.0, DMF). For compound 1j (Sigma–Aldrich): described [α]D 20 –44±1 (c 1.0, HOAc); found after protection and deprotection with SEMCl [α]D 20 –45.3 (c 1.0, HOAc) and with TIPSCl [α]D 20 –44.9 (c 1.0, HOAc).
  • 24 Li H, Jiang X, Ye Y.-h, Fan C, Romoff T, Goodman M. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 91
  • 25 Joullié MM, Lassen KM. ARKIVOC 2010; (viii): 189
  • 26 El-Faham A, Albericio F. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 6557
  • 27 We have tried without success: Boc case: TFA–CH2Cl2 (50:50), HCl (4 M) in dioxane at r.t. or 0 °C. Fmoc case: DMF–piperidine (80:20, 90:10, or 95:5), MeCN–Et2NH (90:10). Cbz case: H2, Pd/C (10 mol%) in EtOAc or methanol.

    • For examples of chemoselective Cbz-urethane deprotection in the presence of O-SEM amino esters, see:
    • 28a Pfizenmayer AJ, Ramanjulu JM, Vera MD, Ding X, Xiao D, Chen W.-C, Joullié MM. Tetrahedron 1999; 55: 313
    • 28b See also ref. 12.
    • 28c For one example of chemoselective OBn ether deprotection, see ref. 13.
    • 29a Coste J, Le-Nguyen D, Castro B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990; 31: 205
    • 29b Frérot E, Coste J, Pantaloni A, Dufour M.-N, Jouin P. Tetrahedron 1991; 47: 259
    • 29c Campagne J.-M, Coste J, Jouin P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993; 34: 6743