Download PDF
Klinische Neurophysiologie 2014; 45(03): 144-150
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1382071
Alois-Kornmüller-Preis 2014
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Zerebello-temporale Konnektivität während visueller Wahrnehmung von Körperbewegungen

Cerebello-temporal Connectivity during Visual Perception of Body Motion
A. A. Sokolov
1   Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Schweiz
,
M. Erb
2   Abteilung für Biomedizinische Magnetresonanz, Universitätsklinik Tübingen
,
M. S. Tatagiba
3   Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinik Tübingen
,
W. Grodd
4   Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum Aachen
,
R. S. J. Frackowiak
1   Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Schweiz
,
M. A. Pavlova
2   Abteilung für Biomedizinische Magnetresonanz, Universitätsklinik Tübingen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 September 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die visuelle Wahrnehmung von Bewegungen unserer Mitmenschen ist in unserem Alltag von großer Bedeutung, sei es beim Autofahren oder bei non-verbaler Kommunikation. Während sich zahlreiche Studien mit dem kortikalen System für visuelle Wahrnehmung von Körperbewegungen beschäftigt haben, blieb der Beitrag subkortikaler Strukturen weitgehend ungeklärt. Ausgehend von ersten Läsionsbefunden bei neurochirurgischen Patienten, die auf die Eloquenz des linken lateralen Kleinhirns hinwiesen, konnten wir mittels funktioneller Magnetresonanztomografie (fMRT) eine Beteiligung der links lateralen zerebellären Läppchen Crus I und VIIB an der visuellen Wahrnehmung von Körperbewegungen zeigen. Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) weist auf reziproke effektive Konnektivität zwischen dem linken lateralen Kleinhirn und dem rechten superioren temporalen Sulcus (STS), dem Eckpfeiler des Netzwerks für biologische Bewegungswahrnehmung, hin. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) liefert erste Hinweise auf eine direkte reziproke Faserbahnverbindung zwischen Kleinhirn und STS. Die Befunde eröffnen neue Perspektiven in der neurologischen und psychiatrischen Forschung.

Abstract

Visual perception of others’ movements is of great value for daily life activities, e. g., for safe car driving or non-verbal communication. While the cortical system for visual perception of body motion has been addressed in a number of studies, the contribution of subcortical structures remains largely unclear. Based on le­sion findings in neurosurgical patients indicating eloquence of the left lateral cerebellum, by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we could demonstrate that the left lateral cerebellar lobules Crus I and VIIB are involved in visual processing of body motion. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) suggests a reciprocal effective connectivity between the left lateral cerebellum and the right superior temporal sulcus (STS), the cornerstone of the network for biological motion perception. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides the first evidence for a direct bi­directional fibre pathway between the cerebe­llum and STS. These findings open a new window for future neurological and psychiatric research.

Schlüsselwörter

Kleinhirn - biologische Bewegung - Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) - Konnektivität - Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

Key words

cerebellum - biological motion - magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - connectivity - diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Pavlova MA. Biological motion processing as a hallmark of social cognition. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 981-995
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Koldewyn K, Whitney D, Rivera SM. The psychophysics of visual mo­tion and global form processing in autism. Brain 2010; 133: 599-610
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Puce A, Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2003; 358: 435-445
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Blake R, Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Annu Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 47-73
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bonda E, Petrides M, Ostry D et al. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 3737-3744
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Grossman E, Donnelly M, Price R et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci 2000; 12: 711-720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Vaina LM, Solomon J, Chowdhury S et al. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 11656-11661
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Petersen SE, Fox PT, Posner MI et al. Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of single words. J Cogn Neurosci 1989; 1: 153-170
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Allen G, Buxton RB, Wong EC et al. Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science 1997; 275: 1940-1943
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Gruber O. Effects of domain-specific interference on brain activation associated with verbal working memory task performance. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11: 1047-1055
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Nawrot M, Rizzo M. Motion perception deficits from midline cerebellar lesions in human. Vision Res 1995; 35: 723-731
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kaas JH, Collins CE. The organization of sensory cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 498-504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Strick PL, Dum RP, Fiez JA. Cerebellum and nonmotor function. Annu Rev Neurosci 2009; 32: 413-434
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Brodal A. Proceedings: What does the anatomical organization of the cerebrocerebellar connections tell us about their function and clinical importance?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1975; 31: 265
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pavlova M, Lutzenberger W, Sokolov A et al. Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14: 181-188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Sokolov AA, Gharabaghi A, Tatagiba MS et al. Cerebellar engagement in an action observation network. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 486-491
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Knecht S, Drager B, Deppe M et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000; 123 (Pt 12) 2512-2518
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pavlova M, Guerreschi M, Lutzenberger W et al. Cortical response to social interaction is affected by gender. Neuroimage 2010; 50: 1327-1332
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sokolov AA, Erb M, Gharabaghi A et al. Biological motion processing: The left cerebellum communicates with the right superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2824-2830
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ramnani N, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H et al. The evolution of prefrontal inputs to the cortico-pontine system: diffusion imaging evidence from Macaque monkeys and humans. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16: 811-818
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kleinschmidt A, Merboldt KD, Hanicke W et al. Correlational imaging of thalamocortical coupling in the primary visual pathway of the human brain. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1994; 14: 952-957
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Glickstein M, Gerrits N, Kralj-Hans I et al. Visual pontocerebellar projections in the macaque. J Comp Neurol 1994; 349: 51-72
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. Projections to the basis pontis from the superior temporal sulcus and superior temporal region in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 1991; 308: 224-248
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 O’Reilly JX, Beckmann CF, Tomassini V et al. Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 953-965
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1273-1302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J et al. Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage 2009; 46: 1004-1017
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Sokolov AA, Erb M, Grodd W et al. Structural loop between the cerebellum and the superior temporal sulcus: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Cereb Cortex 2014; 24: 626-632
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ciccarelli O, Parker GJ, Toosy AT et al. From diffusion tractography to quantitative white matter tract measures: a reproducibility study. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 348-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Barnea-Goraly N, Kwon H, Menon V et al. White matter structure in autism: preliminary evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 55: 323-326
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kanaan RA, Borgwardt S, McGuire PK et al. Microstructural organization of cerebellar tracts in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66: 1067-1069
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Blake R, Turner LM, Smoski MJ et al. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychol Sci 2003; 14: 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kim J, Doop ML, Blake R et al. Impaired visual recognition of biological motion in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2005; 77: 299-307
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Catani M, Jones DK, Daly E et al. Altered cerebellar feedback projections in Asperger syndrome. Neuroimage 2008; 41: 1184-1191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kaiser MD, Hudac CM, Shultz S et al. Neural signatures of autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 21223-21228
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Baumann O, Greenlee MW. Neural correlates of coherent audiovisual motion perception. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 1433-1443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Gobbini MI, Koralek AC, Bryan RE et al. Two takes on the social brain: a comparison of theory of mind tasks. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 1803-1814
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Jack A, Englander ZA, Morris JP. Subcortical contributions to effective connectivity in brain networks supporting imitation. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49: 3689-3698
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ackermann H, Mathiak K, Riecker A. The contribution of the cerebellum to speech production and speech perception: clinical and functional imaging data. Cerebellum 2007; 6: 202-213
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Helmchen C, Klinkenstein J, Machner B et al. Structural changes in the human brain following vestibular neuritis indicate central vestibular compensation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1164: 104-115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Boop S, Wheless J, Van Poppel K et al. Cerebellar seizures. Journal of neurosurgery Pediatrics 2013; 12: 288-292
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Oyegbile TO, Bayless K, Dabbs K et al. The nature and extent of cerebellar atrophy in chronic temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2011; 52: 698-706
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Pavlova M, Krageloh-Mann I, Sokolov A et al. Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception 2001; 30: 925-933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Baumann O, Borra RJ, Bower JM et al. Consensus paper: Roles of the cerebellum in perception. Cerebellum. in prep.
    PubMed