J Knee Surg 2014; 27(05): 327-330
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1382812
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Disadvantages and Advantages of Transtibial Technique for Creating the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Socket

Brett N. Robin
1   Taos Orthopedic Institute, Taos, New Mexico
,
James H. Lubowitz
1   Taos Orthopedic Institute, Taos, New Mexico
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

23. April 2014

01. Mai 2014

Publikationsdatum:
21. Juni 2014 (online)

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral socket techniques have distinct advantages and disadvantages when considering the following techniques: transtibial, anteromedial portal, outside-in, and outside-in retroconstruction. There is no one perfect technique and we have an incomplete understanding of anatomical, biomechanical, isometry, stability, and clinical outcomes. Our primary focus is transtibial technique for creating the ACL femoral socket. Advantages include less invasive, isometric graft placement, stable Lachman exam, and minimal graft impingement with the tunnel and notch. Disadvantages include nonanatomic vertical graft placement that can cause rotational instability and positive pivot shift, interference screw divergence, graft-tunnel length mismatch, femoral socket constraint, posterior cruciate ligament impingement, and a short, oblique tibial tunnel that may undermine the medial plateau in an attempt to achieve anatomic ACL reconstruction.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rue JP, Ghodadra N, Lewis PB, Bach Jr BR. Femoral and tibial tunnel position using a transtibial drilled anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (3) 246-249
  • 2 Schmieding R. Helping Surgeons Treat Their Patients Better: A History of Arthrex's Contribution to Arthroscopic Surgery. Arthrex; 2006
  • 3 Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM. Definitive landmarks for reproducible tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (3) 275-288
  • 4 Hwang MD, Piefer JW, Lubowitz JH. Anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (5) 728-734
  • 5 Lubowitz JH, Ahmad CS, Anderson K. All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (5) 717-727
  • 6 Lubowitz JH. Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (5) 1190-1195
  • 7 Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Fillingham YA , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA Football Team Physicians. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (6) 731-738
  • 8 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (3) 629-634
  • 9 Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M, Demontis A, Fabbriciani C. Clinical and radiographic results of ACL reconstruction: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study of outside-in versus inside-out reconstruction techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (2) 77-85
  • 10 Gill TJ, Steadman JR. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction the two-incision technique. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33 (4) 727-735 , vii
  • 11 Segawa H, Koga Y, Omori G, Sakamoto M, Hara T. Contact pressure in anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels: comparison of endoscopic and two-incision technique. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (4) 439-444
  • 12 Garofalo R, Mouhsine E, Chambat P, Siegrist O. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the two-incision technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (6) 510-516
  • 13 Heming JF, Rand J, Steiner ME. Anatomical limitations of transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (10) 1708-1715
  • 14 Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (1) 113-115
  • 15 Gavriilidis I, Motsis EK, Pakos EE, Georgoulis AD, Mitsionis G, Xenakis TA. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee 2008; 15 (5) 364-367
  • 16 Lopez-Vidriero E, Hugh Johnson D. Evolving concepts in tunnel placement. Sports Med Arthrosc 2009; 17 (4) 210-216
  • 17 Alentorn-Geli E, Samitier G, Alvarez P, Steinbacher G, Cugat R. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (5) 747-754
  • 18 George MS. Femoral tunnel drilling from the anteromedial portal using the figure-4 position in ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (8) 674-677
  • 19 Mardani-Kivi M, Madadi F, Keyhani S, Karimi-Mobarake M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. Antero-medial portal vs. transtibial techniques for drilling femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring tendon: a cross-sectional study with 1-year follow-up. Med Sci Monit 2012; 18 (11) CR674-CR679
  • 20 Logan JS, Elliot RR, Wilson AJ. TransLateral ACL reconstruction: a technique for anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (7) 1289-1292
  • 21 Zhang Q, Zhang S, Li R, Liu Y, Cao X. Comparison of two methods of femoral tunnel preparation in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Acta Cir Bras 2012; 27 (8) 572-576
  • 22 Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind MC. Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (1) 98-105
  • 23 Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (8) 1330-1337
  • 24 Wang H, Fleischli JE, Zheng NN. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes of knee joint kinematics during walking. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (8) 1847-1856
  • 25 Koutras G, Papadopoulos P, Terzidis IP, Gigis I, Pappas E. Short-term functional and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (8) 1904-1909
  • 26 Brown Jr CH, Spalding T, Robb C. Medial portal technique for single-bundle anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (2) 253-269
  • 27 Seo SS, Kim CW, Kim JG, Jin SY. Clinical results comparing transtibial technique and outside in technique in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res 2013; 25 (3) 133-140
  • 28 Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH. Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (9) 1566-1571
  • 29 Lubowitz JH. Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (1) 95-101
  • 30 Lubowitz JH. No-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the transtibial all-inside technique. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (8) e1-e11