Geburtshilfe. Vaginale Entbindung nach ein- oder mehrmaliger Sectio – ist das möglich und erlaubt?

Mittlerweile erfolgt fast ein Drittel aller Krankenhausentbindungen per Kaiserschnitt. Nach Angaben des Statistischen Bundesamts ist die Sectiorate in den Jahren von 1991–2012 auf einen Wert von 31,9 % angestiegen. Dies stellt eine Steigerung von 207,7 % im Vergleich zum Jahr 1991 dar. Auffällig ist die regional sehr unterschiedliche Kaiserschnittrate, wobei die Rate in den östlichen Bundesländern deutlich niedriger als in den westlichen ist. Die höchste Kaiserschnittrate weist mit 37,2 % das Saarland auf, die niedrigste Sachsen mit 23,7 % (Stand 2012, [1]).

• Literatur

• 1 Statistisches Bundesamt. 2014 Online: https://www.destatis.de/ Stand: 30.08.2014
• 2 Scott JR. Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience. BJOG 2014; 121: 157-162
• 3 Foureur M, Ryan CL, Nicholl M et al. Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Birth 2010; 37: 3-10
• 4 Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) Online: http://awmf.org Stand: 30.08.2014
• 5 Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226-1232
• 6 Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Allsworth JE et al. Frequent epidural dosing as a marker for impending uterine rupture in patients who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 355.e1-355.e5
• 7 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 450-463
• 8 Graseck AS, Odibo AO, Tuuli M et al. Normal first stage of labor in women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 732-736
• 9 Bonanno C, Clausing M, Berkowitz R. VBAC: a medicolegal perspective. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 217-225
• 10 Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 12-20
• 11 Holmgren C, Scott JR, Porter TF et al. Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 725-731
• 12 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 3-8
• 13 Scott JR. Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: an alternative viewpoint. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 811-814
• 14 Burgos J, Cobos P, Rodriguez L et al. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121: 230-235
• 15 Ford AA, Bateman BT, Simpson LL. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1138-1142
• 16 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. Green-top Guideline No. 45. 2007
• 17 Doret M, Touzet S, Bourdy S et al. Vaginal birth after two previous c-sections: obstetricians-gynaecologists opinions and practice patterns. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1487-1492
• 18 Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1223-1228
• 19 Cahill AG, Tuuli M, Odibo AO et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean for women with three or more prior caesareans: assessing safety and success. BJOG 2010; 117: 422-427
• 20 Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E et al. Validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 571-578
• 21 Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S et al. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 321-327