Facelifting: Anatomical Considerations

Abstract

Facelifting techniques continue to evolve as our understanding of facial aging improves. Improved technology to affect changes on skin for tightening and volume restoration with fat grafting or fillers have improved results and safety for our patients. Success with facelifting and facial rejuvenation requires an understanding of the underlying anatomy and allows restoration of the anatomy to the younger more youthful status while avoiding complications.

Keywords

facial anatomy - aging face - rhytidectomy - facial nerve injury - facelift

• References

• 1 Ramirez OM, Robertson KM. Update in endoscopic forehead rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2002; 10 (1) 37-51
• 2 Knize DM. Reassessment of the coronal incision and subgaleal dissection for foreheadplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (2) 478-489 , discussion 490–492
• 3 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (1) 80-88
• 4 Cutting CB, McCarthy JG, Berenstein A. Blood supply of the upper craniofacial skeleton: the search for composite calvarial bone flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74 (5) 603-610
• 5 Casanova R, Cavalcante D, Grotting JC, Vasconez LO, Psillakis JM. Anatomic basis for vascularized outer-table calvarial bone flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (3) 300-308
• 6 Knize DM. Muscles that act on glabellar skin: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (1) 350-361
• 7 Pitanguy I, Ramos AS. The frontal branch of the facial nerve: the importance of its variations in face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 38 (4) 352-356
• 8 Lei T, Xu DC, Gao JH , et al. Using the frontal branch of the superficial temporal artery as a landmark for locating the course of the temporal branch of the facial nerve during rhytidectomy: an anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (2) 623-629 , discussion 630
• 9 Knize DM. A study of the supraorbital nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (3) 564-569
• 10 Wolfe SA, Baird WL. The subcutaneous forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (2) 251-256
• 11 Ramirez OM. Endoscopic subperiosteal browlift and facelift. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (4) 639-660
• 12 Ramirez OM. Classification of facial rejuvenation techniques based on the subperiosteal approach and ancillary procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (1) 45-55
• 13 Vasconez LO, Core GB, Oslin B. Endoscopy in plastic surgery. An overview. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (4) 585-589
• 14 Ramirez OM. Why I prefer the endoscopic forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (4) 1033-1039 , discussion 1043–1046
• 15 De Cordier BC, de la Torre JI, Al-Hakeem MS , et al. Rejuvenation of the midface by elevating the malar fat pad: review of technique, cases, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (6) 1526-1536 , discussion 1537–1540
• 16 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (7) 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
• 17 Yousif NJ, Mendelson BC. Anatomy of the midface. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (2) 227-240
• 18 Gardetto A, Dabernig J, Rainer C, Piegger J, Piza-Katzer H, Fritsch H. Does a superficial musculoaponeurotic system exist in the face and neck? An anatomical study by the tissue plastination technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (2) 664-672 , discussion 673–675
• 19 Gosain AK, Yousif NJ, Madiedo G, Larson DL, Matloub HS, Sanger JR. Surgical anatomy of the SMAS: a reinvestigation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (7) 1254-1263 , discussion 1264–1265
• 20 Thaller SR, Kim S, Patterson H, Wildman M, Daniller A. The submuscular aponeurotic system (SMAS): a histologic and comparative anatomy evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (4) 690-696
• 21 Schaverien MV, Pessa JE, Saint-Cyr M, Rohrich RJ. The arterial and venous anatomies of the lateral face lift flap and the SMAS. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (5) 1581-1587
• 22 Zani R, Fadul Jr R, Da Rocha MA, Santos RA, Alves MC, Ferreira LM. Facial nerve in rhytidoplasty: anatomic study of its trajectory in the overlying skin and the most common sites of injury. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51 (3) 236-242
• 23 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (1) 11-16
• 24 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (5) 1804-1809
• 25 Owsley JQ. Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91 (3) 463-474 , discussion 475–476
• 26 Owsley JQ, Fiala TG. Update: lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (3) 715-722
• 27 Owsley JQ. Elevation of the malar fat pad superficial to the orbicularis oculi muscle for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (2) 279-293
• 28 Hamra ST. Arcus marginalis release and orbital fat preservation in midface rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (2) 354-362
• 29 Rohrich RJ, Rios JL, Smith PD, Gutowski KA. Neck rejuvenation revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (5) 1251-1263
• 30 Barton Jr FE. The “high SMAS” face lift technique. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22 (5) 481-486
• 31 de Castro CC. The anatomy of the platysma muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (5) 680-683
• 32 Padgett EC, Stephenson KL. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springfiled, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1948. ,638
• 33 McKinney P. The management of platysma bands. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (6) 999-1006
• 34 Lefkowitz T, Hazani R, Chowdhry S, Elston J, Yaremchuk MJ, Wilhelmi BJ. Anatomical landmarks to avoid injury to the great auricular nerve during rhytidectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (1) 19-23
• 35 Rohrich RJ, Taylor NS, Ahmad J, Lu A, Pessa JE. Great auricular nerve injury, the “subauricular band” phenomenon, and the periauricular adipose compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (2) 835-843
• 36 Izquierdo R, Parry SW, Boydell CL, Almand J. The great auricular nerve revisited: pertinent anatomy for SMAS-platysma rhytidectomy. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 27 (1) 44-48
• 37 Daane SP, Owsley JQ. Incidence of cervical branch injury with “marginal mandibular nerve pseudo-paralysis” in patients undergoing face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (7) 2414-2418
• 38 Hazani R, Chowdhry S, Mowlavi A, Wilhelmi BJ. Bony anatomic landmarks to avoid injury to the marginal mandibular nerve. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (3) 286-289
• 39 Giampapa VC, Mesa JM. Neck rejuvenation with suture suspension platysmaplasty technique: a minimally invasive neck lift technique that addresses all patients' anatomic needs. Clin Plast Surg 2014; 41 (1) 109-124
• 40 Ellenbogen R, Karlin JV. Visual criteria for success in restoring the youthful neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (6) 826-837
• 41 Labbé D, Franco RG, Nicolas J. Platysma suspension and platysmaplasty during neck lift: anatomical study and analysis of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (6) 2001-2007 , discussion 2008–2010
• 42 Guyuron B, Sadek EY, Ahmadian R. A 26-year experience with vest-over-pants technique platysmarrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (3) 1027-1034
• 43 Weisman PA. Simplified technique in submental lipectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 48 (5) 443-446
• 44 Gentile RD. Purse-string platysmaplasty: the third dimension for neck contouring. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21 (4) 296-303
• 45 Citarella ER, Condé-Green A, Sinder R. Triple suture for neck contouring: 14 years of experience. Aesthet Surg J 2010; 30 (3) 311-319
• 46 Feldman JJ. Corset platysmaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (3) 333-343
• 47 Knize DM. Limited incision submental lipectomy and platysmaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (2) 473-481