Oscillometric and Intra-arterial Blood Pressure in Preterm and Term Infants: Extent of Discrepancy and Factors Associated with Inaccuracy

Abstract

Objective Securing an arterial line to monitor continuous blood pressure (BP) is difficult in infants. We aimed to reveal the extent of discrepancies between oscillometric and direct BP.

Study Design Infants who required continuous BP monitoring were prospectively enrolled. Direct and indirect BP were simultaneously recorded. Disposable BP cuffs matching one-half to two-thirds of the upper arm circumference were used.

Results A total of 74 infants were studied (gestational age [GA], 24–42 weeks). The correlation coefficients of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP of indirect and direct measurements were 0.87, 0.82, and 0.84, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean differences in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP (indirect minus direct BP) were 2.2 ± 5.7, − 6.0 ± 5.8, and − 1.3 ± 5.7 mm Hg, respectively. Oscillometric measurements significantly underestimated systolic BP in light-for-gestational-age infants and diastolic BP in infants without fentanyl administration. There were no significant correlations between discrepant BP measurements and edema, vasopressor administration, arterial line location, GA, postnatal age, body weight, pulse rate, or hemoglobin level. In 4.1% of infants, systolic BP increased by 10 to 15 mm Hg at the time of cuff expansion.

Conclusion We recommend intra-arterial BP measurement when the BP values seriously influence the therapeutic protocol.

Keywords

noninvasive blood pressure - arterial line - discomfort - sedation - light-for-gestational-age

• References

• 1 Schindler E, Kowald B, Suess H, Niehaus-Borquez B, Tausch B, Brecher A. Catheterization of the radial or brachial artery in neonates and infants. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15 (8) 677-682
• 2 Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Crit Care 2002; 6 (3) 199-204
• 3 O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA , et al; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39 (4) (Suppl. 01) S1-S34
• 4 Versmold HT, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Gregory GA, Tooley WH. Aortic blood pressure during the first 12 hours of life in infants with birth weight 610 to 4,220 grams. Pediatrics 1981; 67 (5) 607-613
• 5 Gould BA, Hornung RS, Kieso HA, Altman DG, Raftery EB. Is the blood pressure the same in both arms?. Clin Cardiol 1985; 8 (8) 423-426
• 6 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476) 307-310
• 7 Meyer S, Sander J, Gräber S, Gottschling S, Gortner L. Agreement of invasive versus non-invasive blood pressure in preterm neonates is not dependent on birth weight or gestational age. J Paediatr Child Health 2010; 46 (5) 249-254
• 8 Park MK, Menard SM. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Dinamap monitor in infants and children. Pediatrics 1987; 79 (6) 907-914
• 9 Kimble KJ, Darnall Jr RA, Yelderman M, Ariagno RL, Ream AK. An automated oscillometric technique for estimating mean arterial pressure in critically ill newborns. Anesthesiology 1981; 54 (5) 423-425
• 10 Cua CL, Thomas K, Zurakowski D, Laussen PC. A comparison of the Vasotrac with invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in children after pediatric cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2005; 100 (5) 1289-1294
• 11 Takci S, Yigit S, Korkmaz A, Yurdakök M. Comparison between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements in critically ill premature infants. Acta Paediatr 2012; 101 (2) 132-135
• 12 Chia F, Ang AT, Wong TW , et al. Reliability of the Dinamap non-invasive monitor in the measurement of blood pressure of ill Asian newborns. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1990; 29 (5) 262-267
• 13 Troy R, Doron M, Laughon M, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Price W. Comparison of noninvasive and central arterial blood pressure measurements in ELBW infants. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (11) 744-749
• 14 Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ , et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2005; 111 (5) 697-716
• 15 Clark JA, Lieh-Lai MW, Sarnaik A, Mattoo TK. Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (5) 920-923
• 16 Diprose GK, Evans DH, Archer LN, Levene MI. Dinamap fails to detect hypotension in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child 1986; 61 (8) 771-773
• 17 Friesen RH, Lichtor JL. Indirect measurement of blood pressure in neonates and infants utilizing an automatic noninvasive oscillometric monitor. Anesth Analg 1981; 60 (10) 742-745
• 18 Pauca AL, O'Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension 2001; 38 (4) 932-937
• 19 Pauca AL, Wallenhaupt SL, Kon ND, Tucker WY. Does radial artery pressure accurately reflect aortic pressure?. Chest 1992; 102 (4) 1193-1198
• 20 Araghi A, Bander JJ, Guzman JA. Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?. Crit Care 2006; 10 (2) R64
• 21 Gevers M, van Genderingen HR, Lafeber HN, Hack WW. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill neonates with reference to the arterial pressure wave shape. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22 (3) 242-248
• 22 Dannevig I, Dale HC, Liestøl K, Lindemann R. Blood pressure in the neonate: three non-invasive oscillometric pressure monitors compared with invasively measured blood pressure. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94 (2) 191-196
• 23 Lund C, Kuller J, Lane A, Lott JW, Raines DA. Neonatal skin care: the scientific basis for practice. Neonatal Netw 1999; 18 (4) 15-27
• 24 Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med 2004; 66 (3) 411-421
• 25 Fitzgerald M, McIntosh N. Pain and analgesia in the newborn. Arch Dis Child 1989; 64 (4 Spec No) 441-443