Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2015; 36(02): 143-149
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385886
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

What is the Best Method for Assessing Lower Limb Force-Velocity Relationship?

C. Giroux
1   French National Institute of Sport (INSEP), Research Department, Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance
2   CETAPS Laboratory EA3832, Université de Rouen, Mont Saint Aignan, France
,
G. Rabita
1   French National Institute of Sport (INSEP), Research Department, Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance
,
D. Chollet
2   CETAPS Laboratory EA3832, Université de Rouen, Mont Saint Aignan, France
,
G. Guilhem
1   French National Institute of Sport (INSEP), Research Department, Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 05 June 2014

Publication Date:
26 September 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study determined the concurrent validity and reliability of force, velocity and power measurements provided by accelerometry, linear position transducer and Samozino’s methods, during loaded squat jumps. 17 subjects performed squat jumps on 2 separate occasions in 7 loading conditions (0–60% of the maximal concentric load). Force, velocity and power patterns were averaged over the push-off phase using accelerometry, linear position transducer and a method based on key positions measurements during squat jump, and compared to force plate measurements. Concurrent validity analyses indicated very good agreement with the reference method (CV=6.4–14.5%). Force, velocity and power patterns comparison confirmed the agreement with slight differences for high-velocity movements. The validity of measurements was equivalent for all tested methods (r=0.87–0.98). Bland-Altman plots showed a lower agreement for velocity and power compared to force. Mean force, velocity and power were reliable for all methods (ICC=0.84–0.99), especially for Samozino’s method (CV=2.7–8.6%). Our findings showed that present methods are valid and reliable in different loading conditions and permit between-session comparisons and characterization of training-induced effects. While linear position transducer and accelerometer allow for examining the whole time-course of kinetic patterns, Samozino’s method benefits from a better reliability and ease of processing.

Key words

muscle power - linear transducer - accelerometry - force plate - ballistic movements
 

  • References

  • 1 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bobbert MF. Why is the force-velocity relationship in leg press tasks quasi-linear rather than hyperbolic?. J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 1975-1983
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Comstock BA, Solomon-Hill G, Flanagan SD, Earp JE, Luk H-Y, Dobbins KA, Dunn-Lewis C, Fragala MS, Ho J-Y, Hatfield DL, Vingren JL, Denegar CR, Volek JS, Kupchak BR, Maresh CM, Kraemer WJ. Validity of the Myotest® in Measuring force and power production in the squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 2293-2297
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Influence of strength on magnitude and mechanisms of adaptation to power training. Med Sci Sport Exer 2010; 42: 1566-1581
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 1 – Biological basis of maximal power production. Sports Med 2011; 41: 17-38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 2 – Training considerations for improving maximal power production. Sports Med 2011; 41: 125-146
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Crewther BT, Kilduff LP, Cunningham DJ, Cook C, Owen N, Yang GZ. Validating two systems for estimating force and power. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 254-258
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Cronin J, Sleivert G. Challenges in understanding the influence of maximal power training on improving athletic performance. Sports Med 2005; 35: 213-234
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cronin JB, Hansen KT. Strength and power predictors of sports speed. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 349-357
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cronin JB, Hing RD, Mc Nair PJ. Reliability and validity of a linear position transducer for measuring jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 590-593
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 De Haan A. The influence of stimulation frequency on force-velocity characteristics of in situ rat medial gastrocnemius muscle. Exp Physiol 1998; 83: 77-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Dorel S, Guilhem G, Couturier A, Hug F. Adjustment of muscle coordination during an all-out sprint cycling task. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 2154-2164
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Dorel S, Hautier CA, Rambaud O, Rouffet D, Van Praagh E, Lacour JR, Bourdin M. Torque and power-velocity relationships in cycling: relevance to track sprint performance in world-class cyclists. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 739-746
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Dugan EL, La Doyle T, Humphries B, Hasson CJ, Newton RU. Determining the optimal load for jump squats: Areview of methods and calculations. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 668-674
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Eloranta V. Effect of postural and load variation on the coordination of the leg muscles in concentric jumping movement. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 36: 59-64
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Glatthorn JF, Gouge S, Nussbaumer S, Stauffacher S, Impellizzeri FM, Maffiuletti NA. Validity and reliability of optojump photoelectric cells for estimating vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 556-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hibbs AE, Thompson KG, French D, Wrigley A, Spears I. Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strength. Sports Med 2008; 38: 995-1008
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Hill AV. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 1938; 126: 136-195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 2000; 30: 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hori N, Newton RU, Nosaka K, McGuigan MR. Comparison of different methods of determining power output in weightlifting exercises. Strength Cond J 2006; 28: 34-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Jidovtseff B, Crielaard J, Cauchy S, Croisier J. Validity and reliability of an inertial dynamometer using accelerometry. Sci Sport 2008; 23: 94-97
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Jidovtseff B, Harris NK, Crielaard JM, Cronin JB. Using the load-velocity relationship for 1RM prediction. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 267-270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Knudson DV. Correcting the use of the term “power” in the strength and conditioning literature. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1902-1908
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Kraemer WJ, Newton RU. Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2000; 11: 341-368
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Newton RU, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Effects of ballistic training on preseason preparation of elite volleyball players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 323-330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Nuzzo JL, McBride JM. The effect of loading and unloading on muscle activity during the jump squat. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 1758-1764
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rahmani A, Viale F, Dalleau G, Lacour JR. Force/velocity and power/velocity relationships in squat exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001; 84: 227-232
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Samozino P, Morin JB, Hintzy F, Belli A. A simple method for measuring force, velocity and power output during squat jump. J Biomech 2008; 41: 2940-2945
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Sargeant AJ, Hoinville E, Young A. Maximum leg force and power output during short-term dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51: 1175-1182
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Sleivert G, Taingahue M. The relationship between maximal jump-squat power and sprint acceleration in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 46-52
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Suzovic D, Markovic G, Pasic M, Jaric S. Optimum load in various vertical jumps support the maximum dynamic output hypothesis. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1007-1014
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Taylor K-L, Cronin J, Gill N, Chapman D, Sheppard J. Sources of variability in iso-inertial jump assessments. Int J Sport Physiol Perform 2010; 5: 546-558
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Trappe S, Williamson D, Godard M, Porter D, Rowden G, Costill D. Effect of resistance training on single muscle fiber contractile function in older men. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 143-152
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H. Force-velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 650-656
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar