PDF herunterladen
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2014; 46(03): 141-151
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387783
Originalarbeit

Die digitale Volumentomografie in der kieferorthopädischen Praxis

CBCT in Orthodontic Practice
G. Nelson
1   Orthodontic Division, UCSF Dental School, University of California, San Francisco, USA
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag werden die Einsatzmöglichkeiten der Volumentomografie in der kieferorthopädischen Praxis erläutert und auf die diagnostischen Möglichkeiten, die Strahlenbelastung für Patienten und auf Fragen der Haftung wird eingegangen. Des Weiteren wird ein Überblick über wichtige Forschungsergebnisse gegeben, von denen etliche in der Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie der Universität von Kalifornien in San Francisco (UCSF) durchgeführt wurden. Schließlich wird ein systematisches Verfahren zur Beurteilung eines Volumentomogramms vorgestellt.

Abstract

In this article the use of CBCT technology in orthodontic practice will be discussed; considering the diagnostic value, patient radiation exposure, and liability. Significant research, much of which has taken place at UCSF will be reviewed and a systematic approach will be presented to review a CBCT.

Schlüsselwörter

Digitale Volumentomografie (DVT)

Key words

cone beam computed tomography


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. Oktober 2014

© 2014. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthodontist 1931; 1: 45-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 106-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cone Beam for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology SEDENTEXCT project. www.sedentexct.eu
    PubMed
  • 4 Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T. et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 940-946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Al-Ekrish AA. Effect of exposure time on the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions in dry skulls. Saudi Dent J 2012; 24: 127-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Park HS, Yen E, Jeoung SH. Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of orthodontic self-drilling and self-tapping microscrew implants. Korean J Orthod 2006; 36: 295-307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ahn HW, Lee DY, Park YG. et al. Accelerated decompensation of mandibular incisors in surgical skeletal class III patients by using augmented corticotomy: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 199-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K. et al. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 80-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 611-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Shanahan K. UCSF Master’s Thesis 2011, Virtual 3D Orthognathic Treatment Simulation Accuracy: Comparison of Prediction and Surgical Outcome
    PubMed
  • 11 Ulrich B. UCSF Master’s Thesis 2012. Three Dimensional analysis of facial asymmetry in humans using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) – a pilot study
    PubMed
  • 12 Solem RC, Marasco R, Gutierrez-Pulido L. et al. Three-dimensional Soft and Hard Tissue Change in the Treatment of Bimaxillary Protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 218-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O. et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 41-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hoang N. UCSF Master’s Thesis 2013. Relationship between Skeletal Patterns and Alveolar Ridge Types
    PubMed
  • 15 Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC. et al. Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 468-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Brunetto M, Andriani J, Ribeiro G. Locks Three-dimensional assessment of buccal alveolar bone after rapid and slow maxillary expansion: A clinical trial study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 633-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Seo YJ, Chung KR, Kim SH. et al. Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with asymmetry using a bone-bone rapid maxillary expander. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 322-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC. et al. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 764.e1-764.e11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kapila S. Hrsg Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Indications, Insights, and Innovations. Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley & Sons; 2014
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lumbreras B, Donat L, Hernández-Aguado I. Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic texts: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 276-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar