Neuropediatrics 2014; 45(06): 370-377
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387816
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Factors Determining Success of Awake and Asleep Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans in Nonsedated Children

Jennifer Vannest
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Akila Rajagopal
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Nicole D. Cicchino
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Julie Franks-Henry
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Sarah M. Simpson
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Gregory Lee
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Mekibib Altaye
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Claire Sroka
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Scott K. Holland
1   Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
; the CMIND Authorship Consortium › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

05 February 2014

15 June 2014

Publication Date:
21 August 2014 (online)

Abstract

Effective techniques that allow children to complete magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans without sedation are high priority for the imaging community. We used behavioral approaches to scan 64 sleeping infants and toddlers younger than 4 years, and 156 awake children aged 2.5 to 18 years, for a neuroimaging research protocol. Infants and their families participated in a desensitization protocol for several days, then scanning was performed at the child's bedtime during natural sleep. For awake young children, a behavioral protocol was used that included tangible reinforcers, exploration of the scanner environment and a brief practice session. Two scan sessions were targeted for awake children. Success rates by participant were quantified in terms of the proportion of requisite scans in each session that were successfully acquired. The average success rate in sleeping infants and toddlers was 0.461. For awake children aged 2.5 to 6 years, success rates for each session were 0.739 and 0.847. For children aged 7 years and older, success rates were over 0.900 for both the sessions. Overall, though success was lower later in a scan session for both sleeping infants and awake young children, our results demonstrate that it is feasible to collect high-quality imaging data using standard imaging sequences in infants and children without sedation.

* The CMIND (Cincinnati MR Imaging of NeuroDevelopment) Authorship Consortium: Scott K. Holland, PhD,2,7,10,11 Jennifer Vannest, PhD,2,6 Vincent J. Schmithorst, PhD,2,3 Mekibib Altaye, PhD,2,8 Gregory Lee, PhD,2,7 Luis Hernandez-Garcia, PhD,4 Michael Wagner, PhD,2,9 Arthur Toga, PhD,13,14 Jennifer Levitt, MD,15 Anna W. Byars, PhD,2,6 Andrew Dimitrijevic, PhD,10,11 Nicolas Felicelli,9 Darren Kadis, PhD,2,6 James Leach, MD,2,7 Katrina Peariso, MD, PhD,6 Elena Plante, PhD,5 Akila Rajagopal, MS,2 Andrew Rupert, MS,9 Mark Schapiro, MD,2,6 Ronald Ly,15 Petros Petrosyan,13 J. J. Wang, PhD,12 Lisa Freund, PhD16


 
  • References

  • 1 Almli CR, Rivkin MJ, McKinstry RC ; Brain Development Cooperative Group. The NIH MRI study of normal brain development (Objective-2): newborns, infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Neuroimage 2007; 35 (1) 308-325
  • 2 Dean III DC, Dirks H, O'Muircheartaigh J , et al. Pediatric neuroimaging using magnetic resonance imaging during non-sedated sleep. Pediatr Radiol 2014; 44 (1) 64-72
  • 3 Byars AW, Holland SK, Strawsburg RH , et al. Practical aspects of conducting large-scale functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in children. J Child Neurol 2002; 17 (12) 885-890
  • 4 de Bie HM, Boersma M, Wattjes MP , et al. Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169 (9) 1079-1085
  • 5 Hallowell LM, Stewart SE, de Amorim E Silva CT, Ditchfield MR. Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38 (3) 271-279
  • 6 Raschle NM, Lee M, Buechler R , et al. Making MR imaging child's play - pediatric neuroimaging protocol, guidelines and procedure. J Vis Exp 2009; (29)
  • 7 Yuan W, Altaye M, Ret J , et al. Quantification of head motion in children during various fMRI language tasks. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30 (5) 1481-1489
  • 8 Liu Z, Wang Y, Gerig G , et al. Quality control of diffusion weighted images. Proc Soc Photo Opt Instrum Eng 2010; 7628: 7628
  • 9 Jones DK. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51 (4) 807-815
  • 10 Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. How many diffusion gradient directions are required for HARDI?. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 2009; 17: 358
  • 11 DiMaggio C, Sun LS, Ing C, Li G. Pediatric anesthesia and neurodevelopmental impairments: a Bayesian meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2012; 24 (4) 376-381
  • 12 Loepke AW, Soriano SG. An assessment of the effects of general anesthetics on developing brain structure and neurocognitive function. Anesth Analg 2008; 106 (6) 1681-1707