Can We Quantify Functional Improvement Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Clinical Setting?

Nancy L. Parks; Catherine E. Whitney; Gerard A. Engh

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1390330

The Journal of Knee Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Knee Surg 2015; 28(06): 475-482
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390330

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Can We Quantify Functional Improvement Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Clinical Setting?

Authors

Nancy L. Parks

¹Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, Virginia
Catherine E. Whitney

²Anderson Orthopaedic Physical Therapy, Alexandria, Virginia
Gerard A. Engh

¹Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, Virginia

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if improvements in knee function after arthroplasty could be practicably measured in the clinical setting using available, validated technology. The tools we assessed included a timed test of common activities, a platform posturography analysis, and a portable gait laboratory device to quantify body segment motion. We measured the function of 25 total knee arthroplasty patients before surgery and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Assessment of sit-to-stand, walking, stair climbing, lunging, Knee Society Scores, and Oxford Survey Scores were collected at each interval. Patients showed significant improvement in step length, gait speed, symmetry of weight distribution, symmetry of lunging, and speed of stair climbing. Changes in function with long-term follow-up can be precisely measured, making this technology promising for clinical or research applications.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - functional testing - gait - clinical outcome

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Leskinen J, Eskelinen A, Huhtala H, Paavolainen P, Remes V. The incidence of knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis grows rapidly among baby boomers: a population-based study in Finland. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64 (2) 423-428
2 Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (3) 201-207
3 Berry DJ, Bozic KJ. Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (6, Suppl): 2-4
4 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (4) 780-785
5 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 13-14
6 Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM , et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305 (6846) 160-164
7 Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol 2002; 29 (12) 2473-2476
8 Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K , et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (8) 1010-1014
9 Collins NJ, Roos EM. Patient-reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: commonly used instruments and attributes of a “good” measure. Clin Geriatr Med 2012; 28 (3) 367-394
10 Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (1) 63-69
11 Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis KB. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (431) 157-165
12 Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 64
13 Giesinger JM, Kuster MS, Behrend H, Giesinger K. Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 64
14 Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl. 11) S208-S228
15 Talbot S, Hooper G, Stokes A, Zordan R. Use of a new high-activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (2) 268-273
16 Jacobs CA, Christensen CP. Correlations between knee society function scores and functional force measures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (9) 2414-2419
17 Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (8) 890-895
18 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39 (2) 142-148
19 Ko V, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Crosbie J, Yeo AE. The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14 (1) 145
20 Engh GA, Sheridan MJ, Ammeen DJ. A New Method for Measuring Function with Knee Arthroplasty. Las Vegas, NV: AAOS; 2009
21 Engh GA, Sheridan MJ, Ammeen DJ. The functional assessment test: a method of evaluating improvement in function after knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (4) 712-718
22 El-Kashlan HK, Shepard NT, Asher AM, Smith-Wheelock M, Telian SA. Evaluation of clinical measures of equilibrium. Laryngoscope 1998; 108 (3) 311-319
23 Yardley L, Burgneay J, Nazareth I, Luxon L. Neuro-otological and psychiatric abnormalities in a community sample of people with dizziness: a blind, controlled investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65 (5) 679-684
24 Black FO, Paloski WH, Reschke MF, Igarashi M, Guedry F, Anderson DJ. Disruption of postural readaptation by inertial stimuli following space flight. J Vestib Res 1999; 9 (5) 369-378
25 Lentell G, Katzman LL, Walters MR. The Relationship between Muscle Function and Ankle Stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990; 11 (12) 605-611
26 Mattacola CG, Jacobs CA, Rund MA, Johnson DL. Functional assessment using the step-up-and-over test and forward lunge following ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2004; 27 (6) 602-608
27 Nashner LM, Peters JF. Dynamic posturography in the diagnosis and management of dizziness and balance disorders. Neurol Clin 1990; 8 (2) 331-349
28 Bascuas I, Tejero M, Monleón S, Boza R, Muniesa JM, Belmonte R. Balance 1 year after TKA: correlation with clinical variables. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (1) e6-e12
29 Liston RA, Brouwer BJ. Reliability and validity of measures obtained from stroke patients using the Balance Master. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77 (5) 425-430
30 Topp R, Mikesky A, Thompson K. Determinants of four functional tasks among older adults: an exploratory regression analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27 (2) 144-153
31 Saremi K, Marehbian J, Yan X , et al. Reliability and validity of bilateral thigh and foot accelerometry measures of walking in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20 (2) 297-305
32 Zhang K, Werner P, Sun M, Pi-Sunyer FX, Boozer CN. Measurement of human daily physical activity. Obes Res 2003; 11 (1) 33-40
33 Andriacchi TP, Hurwitz DE. Gait biomechanics and total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 1997; 10 (4) 255-260
34 Andriacchi TP, Ogle JA, Galante JO. Walking speed as a basis for normal and abnormal gait measurements. J Biomech 1977; 10 (4) 261-268
35 Huddleston J, Alaiti A, Goldvasser D , et al. Ambulatory measurement of knee motion and physical activity: preliminary evaluation of a smart activity monitor. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006; 3: 21
36 Chong RK. Factor analysis of the functional limitations test in healthy individuals. Gait Posture 2008; 28 (1) 144-149
37 McKay C, Prapavessis H, McNair P. Comparing the Lower Limb Tasks Questionnaire to the WOMAC: agreement, responsiveness, and convergence with physical performance for knee osteoarthritis patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 (3) 474-479
38 Kleijn LL, van Hemert WL, Meijers WG , et al. Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (10) 1187-1193
39 Witvrouw E, Victor J, Bellemans J , et al. A correlation study of objective functionality and WOMAC in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002; 10 (6) 347-351
40 van den Dikkenberg N, Meijer OG, van der Slikke RM , et al. Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002; 10 (4) 204-212
41 Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, van der Slikke RM , et al. Reproducibility and validity of the DynaPort KneeTest. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53 (3) 357-363
42 Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture 2010; 31 (3) 307-310