Endoscopy 2015; 47(04): 349-351
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390909
Case series
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal tumors: a unique procedure that helps ensure the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection

Tomoyuki Irino
1   Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Souya Nunobe
1   Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Naoki Hiki
1   Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yorimasa Yamamoto
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Toshiaki Hirasawa
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Manabu Ohashi
1   Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Junko Fujisaki
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takeshi Sano
1   Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Toshiharu Yamaguchi
1   Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted09 August 2014

accepted after revision30 September 2014

Publication Date:
05 December 2014 (online)

A new rendezvous-style surgical technique has been developed to ensure the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for duodenal tumors. The new technique, called “laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS),” combines ESD with laparoscopic, reinforcing, seromuscular suturing. This case series report describes how three patients with a duodenal tumor were safely treated by LECS. ESD was performed by endoscopy, followed by closure of the mucosal defect using seromuscular suturing by laparoscopy. ESD was successfully completed in all patients. Endoscopic findings after suturing revealed that the mucosal defect was closed appropriately and tightly. None of the three patients experienced delayed perforation or stricture after LECS. LECS for extraction of duodenal tumors seems to be feasible and helps to ensure the safety of ESD in the duodenum.

 
  • References

  • 1 Jung JH, Choi KD, Ahn JY et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile, nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 133-135
  • 2 Yamamoto Y, Yoshizawa N, Tomida H et al. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumor. Dig Endosc 2014; 26 (Suppl. 02) 50-56
  • 3 Inoue T, Uedo N, Yamashina T et al. Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 220-227
  • 4 Hiki N, Yamamoto Y, Fukunaga T et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1729-1735
  • 5 Nunobe S, Hiki N, Gotoda T et al. Successful application of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for a lateral-spreading mucosal gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15: 338-342
  • 6 Inoue H, Ikeda H, Hosoya T et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and beyond: full-layer resection for gastric cancer with nonexposure technique (CLEAN-NET). Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2012; 21: 129-140
  • 7 Mitsui T, Goto O, Shimizu N et al. Novel technique for full-thickness resection of gastric malignancy: feasibility of nonexposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS) in porcine models. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2013; 23: e217-221
  • 8 Azevedo JL, Hypolito O, Azevedo OC et al. Comparative study of hand sewn single layer anastomosis of dog’s bowel. Arq Gastroenterol 2008; 45: 319-322
  • 9 Hanaoka N, Uedo N, Ishihara R et al. Clinical features and outcomes of delayed perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1112-1115
  • 10 Shen MY, Huang IP, Chen WS et al. Influence of pneumoperitoneum on tumor growth and pattern of intra-abdominal tumor spreading: in vivo study of a murine model. Hepatogastroenterology 2008; 55: 947-951