Screening of esophageal varices by esophageal capsule endoscopy: results of a French multicenter prospective study

Background and study aim: Esophageal video capsule endoscopy (ECE) is a new technique that allows examination of the esophagus using a noninvasive approach. The aim of this study was to compare ECE with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for the diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

Patients and methods: A total of 330 patients with cirrhosis and with no known esophageal varices were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent ECE first, followed by EGD (gold standard). The endoscopists who performed EGD were blind to the ECE result. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale (maximum score 100).

Results: A total of 30 patients were excluded from the analysis because they did not undergo any endoscopic examinations. Patients (mean age 56 years; 216 male) had mainly alcoholic (45 %) or viral (27 %) cirrhosis. The diagnostic indices of ECE to diagnose and correctly stage esophageal varices were: sensitivity 76 % and 64 %, specificity 91 % and 93 %, positive predictive value 88 % and 88 %, and negative predictive value 81 % and 78 %, respectively. ECE patient satisfaction scored significantly higher than EGD (87 ± 22 vs. 58 ± 35; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: ECE was well tolerated and safe in patients with liver cirrhosis and suspicion of portal hypertension. The sensitivity of ECE is not currently sufficient to replace EGD as a first exploration in these patients. However, due to its excellent specificity and positive predictive value, ECE may have a role in cases of refusal or contraindication to EGD. ECE might also improve compliance to endoscopic follow-up and aid important therapeutic decision making in the prophylaxis of bleeding.

Trial registration: EudraCT (ID RCB 2009-A00532-55) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00941421).

• References

• 1 De Franchis R, Prignani M. Natural history of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2001; 5: 645-663
• 2 Pascal JP, Cales P. Propranolol in the prevention of first upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 856-861
• 3 Kishimoto H, Sakai M, Kajiyama T et al. Clinical trial of prophylactic endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices. J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 6-11
• 4 Lapalus MG, Saurin JC. Complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy: gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2003; 27: 909-921
• 5 Ciriza de los Ríos C, Fernández Eroles AL, García Menéndez L et al. Sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Analysis of tolerance, complications and cost-effectiveness. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 28: 2-9
• 6 Abraham NS, Fallone CA, Mayrand S et al. Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1692-1699
• 7 Boursier J, Dib N, Oberti F et al. Role of fibrosis degree in the clinical course of chronic liver diseases. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: A804
• 8 Thabut D, Trabut JB, Massard J et al. Non invasive diagnosis of large oesophageal varices by fibrotest in patients with cirrhosis: a preliminary retrospective study. Liver Int 2006; 26: 271-278
• 9 Nguyen-Khac E, Chatelain D, Tramier B et al. Assessment of asymptomatic liver fibrosis in alcoholic patients using fibroscan: prospective comparison with 7 non-invasive laboratory tests. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008 Aug 14
• 10 Giannini EG, Zaman A, Kreil A et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for the non-invasive diagnosis of oesophageal varices: results of a multicenter, prospective, validation study. Am J Gastroenterology 2006; 101: 2511-2519
• 11 Eliakim R, Carter D. Endoscopic assessment of the small bowel. Dig Dis 2013; 31: 194-198
• 12 Lapalus MG, Dumortier J, Fumex F et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating portal hypertension: a prospective comparative study of performance and tolerance. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 36-41
• 13 Eisen GM, Eliakim R, Zaman A et al. The accuracy of PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective three-center pilot study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 31-35
• 14 Pena LR, Cox T, Koch AG et al. Study comparing oesophageal capsule endoscopy versus EGD in the detection of varices. Dig Liver Dis 2008; 40: 216-223
• 15 Frenette CT, Kuldau JG, Hillebrand DJ et al. Comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy for diagnosis of esophageal varices. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4480-4485
• 16 Lapalus MG, Ben Soussan E, Gaudric M et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy vs. EGD for the evaluation of portal hypertension: a French prospective multicenter comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1112-1118
• 17 Lu Y, Gao R, Liao Z et al. Meta-analysis of capsule endoscopy in patients diagnosed or suspected with esophageal varices. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1254-1258
• 18 De Franchis R, Eisen GM, Eliakim A et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy for screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension. Hepatology 2008; 47: 1595-1603
• 19 Haute Autorité de Santé. Diagnosis of uncomplicated cirrhosis. Available from: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/diagnosis_uncomplicated_cirrhosis_english_version.pdf. Accessed: December 2008
• 20 Gralnek IM, Rabinovitz R, Afik D et al. A simplified ingestion procedure for esophageal capsule endoscopy: initial evaluation in healthy volunteers. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 913-918
• 21 De Franchis R. Updating consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno III consensus workshop on definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2000; 33: 846-856
• 22 Knottnerus JA, Muris JW. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1118-1128
• 23 Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-412
• 24 Ghosh AK. Refusal of endoscopy in cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh class a without prior variceal bleeding: an internist dilemma. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 947-948
• 25 Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 581-589
• 26 Winkfield B, Aube C, Burtin P et al. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability in hepatology. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 15: 959-966
• 27 Bedossa P, Carrat F. Liver biopsy: the best, not the gold standard. J Hepatol 2009; 50: 1-3
• 28 Mehta SH, Lau B, Afdhal NH et al. Exceeding the limits of liver histology markers. J Hepatol 2009; 50: 36-41
• 29 Schreibman I, Meitz K, Kunselman AR et al. Defining the threshold: new data on the ability of capsule endoscopy to discriminate the size of esophageal varices. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 220-226