Endoscopy 2015; 47(S 01): E232-E233
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391904
Cases and Techniques Library (CTL)
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Removal of a large, 40-mm, submucosal leiomyoma using submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and extraction of specimen using a distal mucosal incision

Jun Jie Ng
1   Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore
,
Philip W. Y. Chiu
2   Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
,
Asim Shabbir
1   Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore
,
Jimmy B. Y. So
1   Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 June 2015 (online)

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) combines the techniques of peroral endoscopic myotomy [1] and endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of upper gastrointestinal tract submucosal tumors (SMTs). STER has been used for removal of small SMTs below 20 mm with low complication rates [2] [3] [4]. This report describes the removal of a large 40-mm esophageal SMT using STER, and describes a novel technique to aid the en bloc extraction of large SMTs during STER.

A 57-year-old man presented with dysphagia. Upper endoscopy ([Video 1]) and endoscopic ultrasound ([Fig. 1]) confirmed a 40-mm SMT in the mid esophagus. The novel technique used for the removal of the SMT is shown in [Fig. 2]. A single-channel endoscope with a transparent distal cap attachment was used. Following injection of diluted indigo carmine, a mucosal incision was made using a triangle tip knife, 4 cm proximal to the tumor. A submucosal tunnel was created towards the tumor ([Video 2]), and peri-tumoral dissection was accomplished by division of submucosal fibers and attachments ([Video 3]). After completion of peri-tumoral dissection, removal of the SMT by various endoscopic retrieval devices, including snares and nets, was unsuccessful because of the size of the SMT and the limited working space available within the submucosal tunnel ([Video 4]).


Quality:
Identification of the submucosal tumor.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Endoscopic ultrasound demonstrated a homogeneous hypoechoic mass originating from the muscularis propria.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Case illustration of the submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection technique and distal mucosal incision technique. a The submucosal tumor (SMT), located at 29 – 33 cm from the incisors. b A mucosal incision was made 4 cm proximal to the SMT. c – e A submucosal tunnel was created toward the SMT. f – h Peri-tumoral dissection was performed to free the SMT. i A mucosal incision was made distal to the tumor from within the submucosal tunnel. j The tumor was pushed through the distal mucosal incision into the true lumen of the distal esophagus and proximal stomach using the endoscope. k Retrieval of the tumor from the proximal stomach using a Roth net. l Closure of the distal and proximal mucosal defects with endoscopic clips.


Quality:
Development of a submucosal tunnel toward the submucosal tumor.


Quality:
Peri-tumoral dissection within the submucosal tunnel.

A novel second distal mucosal incision technique was performed for en bloc removal of the resected specimen, as illustrated in [Fig. 3]. A submucosal tunnel was created 4 cm distal to the tumor, and a mucosal incision was made from within the submucosal tunnel ([Video 4]). The SMT was then pushed using the endoscope from the submucosal tunnel into the true lumen of the distal esophagus and into the stomach through the distal mucosal incision. With adequate working space in the stomach, a net could be deployed easily over the SMT, and the SMT was retrieved. The mucosal defects were closed using endoscopic clips and endoloops ([Video 5]).


Quality:
Distal mucosal incision and tumor retrieval.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Schematic of the distal mucosal incision technique. a Submucosal tumor (SMT) arising from the submucosal layer of the esophagus. b A proximal mucosal incision was made as part of the standard submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection technique. c The submucosal tunnel was further developed distal to the SMT after peri-tumoral dissection, and a second mucosal incision was made from within. d The SMT was pushed using the endoscope through the distal mucosal incision into the true esophageal lumen. e The SMT was retrieved using an endoscopic retrieval device from the true lumen of the esophagus or stomach.


Quality:
Closure of the mucosal incisions.

The entire procedure took 245 minutes. The final resected specimen ([Fig. 4]) measured 40 mm, and histopathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of a leiomyoma.

Zoom Image
Fig. 4 The resected submucosal tumor was retrieved en bloc, and measured 40 mm in maximal diameter.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG

 
  • References

  • 1 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
  • 2 Ye LP, Zhang Y, Mao XL et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for small upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 524-530
  • 3 Liu BR, Song JT, Kong LJ et al. Tunneling endoscopic muscularis dissection for subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4354-4359
  • 4 Xu MD, Cai MY, Zhou PH et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: a new technique for treating upper GI submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 195-199