Utility of clinical suspicion and endoscopic re-examination for detection of esophagogastric perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia

Background and study aims: Esophagrams are often obtained routinely after pneumatic balloon dilation for achalasia, even in asymptomatic patients, as there is a risk of postprocedure esophagogastric perforation, which is a potentially life-threatening complication. The aim of this study was to determine whether the combination of a clinical suspicion of perforation and endoscopic re-examination after pneumatic dilation for achalasia can detect esophagogastric perforation, and thereby preclude the need for routine esophagrams in all patients.

Patients and methods: All patients who underwent pneumatic dilation between January 2002 and June 2012 at our single tertiary referral center were identified retrospectively. Procedures were categorized into two groups: Group 1 underwent routine esophagograms after pneumatic dilation, and Group 2 underwent esophagograms only if there was a clinical suspicion of perforation. The detection rate of esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation was compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 119 achalasia dilation procedures were performed in 70 patients. Group 1 included 49/119 procedures (41.2 %), all of which were followed by routine esophagograms. Group 2 included 70/119 procedures (58.8 %), 12 of which were followed by esophagograms based on a clinical suspicion of perforation. No esophageal perforations were found in Group 1, whereas three were found in Group 2. No perforations occurred in the 58 procedures that were not followed by esophagograms. The overall rate of perforation was 3/119 (2.5 %).

Conclusions: Esophagrams obtained routinely after pneumatic dilation for achalasia did not reveal unsuspected esophagogastric perforations. No esophageal perforations were missed after procedures that were not followed by esophagograms. Obtaining an esophagram only in cases of clinical suspicion of perforation and endoscopic evaluation may be an alternative to routine esophagograms in patients undergoing pneumatic dilation for achalasia.

• References

• 1 Park W, Vaezi MF. Etiology and pathogenesis of achalasia: the current understanding. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1404-1414
• 2 Podas T, Eaden J, Mayberry M et al. Achalasia: a critical review of epidemiological studies. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 2345-2347
• 3 Sadowski DC, Ackah F, Jiang B et al. Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: e256-e261
• 4 Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1807-1816
• 5 Lynch KL, Pandolfino JE, Howden CW et al. Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1817-1825
• 6 Talukdar R, Inoue H, Reddy DN. Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2014; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4040-6.
• 7 Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1238-1249
• 8 Riley SA, Attwood SE. Guidelines on the use of oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 2004; 53: i1-i6
• 9 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 10 Eckardt VF. Clinical presentations and complications of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2001; 11: 281-292
• 11 Eckardt VF, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation. Gastroenterology 1992; 103: 1732-1738
• 12 Shaker H, Elsayed H, Whittle I et al. The influence of the “golden 24-h rule” on the prognosis of oesophageal perforation in the modern era. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 38: 216-222
• 13 Ott DJ, Wu WC, Gelfand DW et al. Radiographic evaluation of the achalasic esophagus immediately following pneumatic dilatation. Gastrointest Radiol 1984; 9: 185-191
• 14 Lin MT, Tai WC, Chiu KW et al. Delayed presentation of intrathoracic esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 4461-4463
• 15 Nirula R. Esophageal perforation. Surg Clin North Am 2014; 94: 35-41
• 16 Coda S, Antonellis F, Tsagkaropulos S et al. Complete endoscopic closure (clipping) of a large esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation in a patient with achalasia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22: 815-818
• 17 Wewalka FW, Clodi PH, Haidinger D. Endoscopic clipping of esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 608-611
• 18 Kirschniak A, Subotova N, Zieker D et al. The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, and fistulas. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2901-2905
• 19 Kurian AA, Bhayani NH, Reavis K et al. Endoscopic suture repair of full-thickness esophagotomy during per-oral esophageal myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3910
• 20 Qadeer MA, Dumot JA, Vargo JJ et al. Endoscopic clips for closing esophageal perforations: case report and pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 605-611