In-class didactic versus self-directed teaching of the probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) criteria for Barrett’s esophagus

Background and aims: Optimal teaching methods for disease recognition using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) have not been developed. Our aim was to compare in-class didactic teaching vs. self-directed teaching of Barrett’s neoplasia diagnosis using pCLE.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary academic center. Study participants with no prior pCLE experience were randomized to in-class didactic (group 1) or self-directed teaching groups (group 2). For group 1, an expert conducted a classroom teaching session using standardized educational material. Participants in group 2 were provided with the same material on an audio PowerPoint. After initial training, all participants graded an initial set of 20 pCLE videos and reviewed correct responses with the expert (group 1) or on audio PowerPoint (group 2). Finally, all participants completed interpretations of a further 40 videos.

Results: Eighteen trainees (8 medical students, 10 gastroenterology trainees) participated in the study. Overall diagnostic accuracy for neoplasia prediction by pCLE was 77 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 74.0 % – 79.2 %); of predictions made with high confidence (53 %), the accuracy was 85 % (95 %CI 81.8 % – 87.8 %). The overall accuracy and interobserver agreement was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 for all predictions (80.4 % vs. 73 %; P = 0.005) and for high confidence predictions (90 % vs. 80 %; P < 0.001). Following feedback (after the initial 20 videos), the overall accuracy improved from 73 % to 79 % (P = 0.04), mainly driven by a significant improvement in group 1 (74 % to 84 %; P < 0.01). Accuracy of prediction significantly improved with time in endoscopy training (72 % students, 77 % FY1, 82 % FY2, and 85 % FY3; P = 0.003).

Conclusion: For novice trainees, in-class didactic teaching enables significantly better recognition of the pCLE features of Barrett’s esophagus than self-directed teaching. The in-class didactic group had a shorter learning curve and were able to achieve 90 % accuracy for their high confidence predictions.

• References

• 1 Wu J, Pan YM, Wang TT et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for detection of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: a meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2014; 27: 248-254
• 2 Konda VJ, Chennat JS, Hart J et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy: potential in the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2010; 23: E21-E31
• 3 Gupta A, Attar BM, Koduru P et al. Utility of confocal laser endomicroscopy in identifying high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 369-377
• 4 Gaddam S, Mathur SC, Singh M et al. Novel probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy criteria and interobserver agreement for the detection of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1961-1969
• 5 Sharma P, Meining AR, Coron E et al. Real-time increased detection of neoplastic tissue in Barrett’s esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: final results of an international multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 465-472
• 6 Tofteland N, Singh M, Gaddam S et al. Evaluation of the updated confocal laser endomicroscopy criteria for Barrett’s esophagus among gastrointestinal pathologists. Dis Esophagus 2014; 27: 623-629
• 7 Wallace MB, Sharma P, Lightdale C et al. Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 19-24
• 8 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
• 9 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D et al. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Open Med 2010; 4: e60-e68
• 10 Canto MI, Anandasabapathy S, Brugge W et al. In vivo endomicroscopy improves detection of Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasia: a multicenter international randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 211-221
• 11 Qumseya BJ, Wang H, Badie N et al. Dysplasia and neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1562-1570; e1-e2
• 12 Wang KK, Okoro N, Prasad G et al. Endoscopic evaluation and advanced imaging of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2011; 21: 39-51